Journals / Türk Otolarengoloji Arşivi / 2006 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2

Çocuklarda kulak, burun, boğaz ve üst gastrointestinal sistem yabancı cisimleri

Ear, nose and upper gastrointestinal system foreign bodies in children

Pages
77–80
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is also best to remove the foreign bodies from ear and nose under general anesthesia when the child is uncooperative or when unsuccessful attempts have been made.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: It is aimed to show the types of foreign bodies and the ways to prevent the complications seen in pediatric age group.Methods: The results of 162 patients with a history of ear, nose or upper aero digestive tract foreign bodies were analyzed retrospectively.Results: The children were aged from 6 months to 14 years old.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There were 81 (50%) females and 81 (50%) males.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is also best to remove the foreign bodies from ear and nose under general anesthesia when the child is uncooperative or when unsuccessful attempts have been made.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: It is aimed to show the types of foreign bodies and the ways to prevent the complications seen in pediatric age group.Methods: The results of 162 patients with a history of ear, nose or upper aero digestive tract foreign bodies were analyzed retrospectively.Results: The children were aged from 6 months to 14 years old. There were 81 (50%) females and 81 (50%) males. The foreign bodies were, bead (n=80), dry food (n=22), eraser (n=13), cotton (n=9), screw (n=7), toys (n=7), coins (n=7), paper (n=6), insect (n=3), naphthalene (n=2), matchstick (n=2), Q-tips (n=2), scotch tape (n=2). There were 90 cases (55.55%) of nasal foreign bodies, in which bead was the most commonly (67.69%) seen; in 65 cases (40.12%) of ear foreign bodies bead was also the most commonly (40%) seen foreign body, whereas in 7 cases (5.5%) coins were the only (100%) foreign body seen in the first narrowing of the esophagus. Tracheobronchial foreign bodies were not included in the study because they were referred to the pediatric surgery department in our hospital. In 112 cases (69%) the removal of the foreign body was performed within the first 24 hours after the foreign body insertion. Twenty of ear foreign bodies (30.7%) and all of the esophageal foreign bodies removed under general anesthesia. Other foreign bodies were removed in emergency room without the need of general anesthesia. External ear canal lacerations in 18 cases (27.69%) and tympanic membrane perforations were observed in 2 cases (3%). Epistaxis was seen in 10 cases (11.11%) after removing the foreign body from the nose. No complication was observed after removal of foreign body from the esophagus.Conclusion: Complications may occur as a result of attempts of removing the foreign bodies. Thus, the effective way to prevent complications is to perform the removal the foreign bodies from the esophagus under general anesthesia. It is also best to remove the foreign bodies from ear and nose under general anesthesia when the child is uncooperative or when unsuccessful attempts have been made.

Özet

Amaç: Pediatrik yaş grubunda görülen yabancı cisimlerin tipini belirlemek ve komplikasyonları nasıl önleyebileceğimizi ifade etmek.Yöntem: Kulak, burun, üst gastrointestinal yabancı cisim öyküsü olan 162 hasta retrospektif olarak analiz edildi.Bulgular: Çocukların yaş aralığı 6 ay ile 14 yaş arasında idi. Olguların 81’i (%50) erkek, 81’i (%50) bayandı. Yabancı cisimler, boncuk (n=80), kuru bakliyat (n=22), silgi (n=13), pamuk (n=9), vida (n=7), oyuncak (n=7), madeni para (n=7), kağıt (n=6), böcek (n=3) , naftalin (n=2), kibrit çöpü (n=2), kulak çubuğu (n=2), selobant (n=2) idi. Burunda tespit edilen 90 yabancı cisim (%55.55) arasında en sık boncuk (%67.69) görülürken; kulaktaki 65 yabancı cisimde de (%40.12) yine en sık boncuk (%40) görüldü. Özofagus birinci darlıkta yabancı cisim görülen 7 olguda (%5.5) hepsi madeni paraydı. Trakeobronşial yabancı cisimler çocuk cerrahisi tarafından karşılandığından çalışmaya trakeobronşial yabancı cisimler dahil edilmemiştir. Yüzoniki olguda (%69) yabancı cisim çıkarılması ilk 24 saatte gerçekleşti. Kulaktaki 20 yabancı cisim (%30.7) ve özofagustaki tüm yabancı cisimler genel anestezi altında çıkarılmıştır. Diğer yabancı cisimler genel anestezi gerektirmeden acil serviste çıkarılmıştır. Kulaktan yabancı cisim çıkarılmasına bağlı 18 (%27.69) olguda dış kulak yolunda laserasyon, 2 (%3) olguda timpanik membranda perforasyon gelişmiştir. Burundan yabancı cisim çıkarılması sonrası 10 olguda (%11 oranında) kanama görülmüştür. Özofagustan yabancı cisim çıkarılması sonrası herhangi bir komplikasyona rastlanmamıştır.Sonuç: Yabancı cisimlere bağlı komplikasyonlar tekrarlanan denemeler sonrası gelişebilir. Bu nedenle özofagustaki yabancı cisimlerin mutlaka genel anestezi altında çıkarılması gerekmektedir. Kulak ve burundaki yabancı cisimler ise çocuk ile kooperasyon kurulamıyorsa ya da birkaç denemede başarısız olunduysa genel anestezi altında çıkarmalı, böylece komplikasyonlar önlenmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUN, B. U., ÜNSAL, Ö., SÖZEN, E., DADAŞ, B. (2022). Çocuklarda kulak, burun, boğaz ve üst gastrointestinal sistem yabancı cisimleri. Türk Otolarengoloji Arşivi, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 77–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/655181

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Balbani AP, Sanchez TG, Butugan O, et al. Ear and nose foreign body removal in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1998; 46: 37-42
  2. Darrow DH, Holinger LD. Aerodigestive tract foreign bodies in the older child and adolescent. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105: 267-71
  3. Erpek MG, Yorgancıoğlu A, Çelik P. Yabancı cisimler. In: Çelik O, editor. Kulak burun boğaz hastalıkları ve baş boyun cerrahisi. İstanbul: Turgut Yayıncılık; 2002. p. 996-1006
  4. Eroglu A, Kürkçüoglu IC, Karaoglanoglu N, Yekeler E, Aslan S, Başoğlu A. Tracheobronchial foreign bodies: a 10 year experience. Ulus Travma Derg 2003; 9: 262-6
  5. Başoğlu A, Ceviz M, Karaoglanoglu N, et al. Tracheobronchial foreign bodies: report of 166 cases. Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi 1997; 5: 52-5
  6. Aytaç A, Yurdakul Y, İkizler C, Olga R, Saylam A. Inhalation of foreign bodies in children. Report of 500 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 74: 145-51
  7. Randall DA. The nose and sinuses. In: Lee KJ, editor. Essential otolaryngology head & neck surgery. 7th ed. Conneticut: Appleton & Lange, 1999. p. 776
  8. Tong MC, Van Hasselt CA, Woo JK. The hazards of button batteries in the nose. J Otolaryngol 1992; 21: 458-60
  9. Güney E, Şeşen T, Tanyeri Y, et al. Kulak burun boğaz ile ilgili yabancı cisimler. Türk Otorhinolaringoloji Derneği VII. Milli Kongresi, Adana 1983 kongre kitabı. İstanbul: Hilal Matbaacılık; 1985. p. 449-55
  10. Brady PG. Esophageal foreign bodies. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1991; 20: 691-701
  11. Lim CT, Quah RF, Loh LE. A prospective study of ingested foreign bodies in Singapore. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120: 96-101
  12. Müderris S, Mimaroğlu C. Özefagus trakea ve bronş yabancı cisimleri. Turk Arch Otolaryngol 1990; 29: 148-50
  13. Çelik O, Yalçın Ş, Aşkın Z, et al. Özefagus yabancı cisimleri. KBB ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi 1995; 3: 54-8
  14. Erpek G, Kızılay A, Saydam L. Özefageal ve trakeobronşial yabancı cisimler. KBB ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi 1996; 4: 258-61
  15. Berggreen PJ, Harrison E, Sanowski RA, Ingebo K, Noland B, Zierer S. Tecniques and complications of esophageal foreign body extraction in children and adults. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 626-30
  16. Hon SK, Izam TM, Koay CB, Razi A. A prospective evaluation of foreign bodies presenting to the Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic, Hospital Kuala Lumpur. Med J Malaysia 2001; 56: 463-70.