Journals / Türk Nöroşirürji Dergsi / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Approach to Lumbar Degenerative Scoliosis

Lomber Dejeneratif Skolyoza Yaklaşım

Pages
230–237
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the literature, patients who underwent surgical treatment are more likely to have a higher quality of life than patients who are followed conservatively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Lumbar degenerative scoliosis occurs in the adult period after 50 years of age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It develops on a background of asymmetric disc degeneration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the literature, patients who underwent surgical treatment are more likely to have a higher quality of life than patients who are followed conservatively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Lumbar degenerative scoliosis occurs in the adult period after 50 years of age. It develops on a background of asymmetric disc degeneration. The patients should be explained that adult scoliotic deformity is a de novo development and can be progressive. To be able to decide on the treatment method in these patients, the complaints, clinical findings, radiological measurements and systemic diseases should be evaluated together. We need all this information to predict the level of healing after surgery. The use of the SRS-Schwab Classification will provide a better understanding of post-surgical expectations. The Berjano and Lamartina classifications can be used to predict what curvatures should be involved in fusion, and what the fusion levels should be. According to the literature, patients who underwent surgical treatment are more likely to have a higher quality of life than patients who are followed conservatively.

Özet

Lomber dejeneratif skolyoz 50 yaş sonrası erişkin dönemde görülür. Asimetrik disk dejenerasyonu zemininde gelişmekte olduğu görülmektedir. Erişkin skolyotik deformitenin bir de novo deformite olduğu ve hastalığın ilerleyici olduğu hastalara anlatılmalıdır. Bu hastalarda tedavi yöntemine karar verebilmek için; şikayetleri, klinik bulguları, radyolojik ölçümleri ve sistemik hastalıkları birlikte yorumlanmalıdır. Cerrahi sonrası iyileşme seviyesini öngörebilmek için tüm bunlara ihtiyacımız var. SRS-Schwab Sınıflaması'nın kullanılması cerrahi sonrası beklentilerin daha iyi anlaşılmasını sağlayacaktır. Hangi eğriliklerin füzyona katılması gerektiği ya da füzyon seviyelerinin ne olması gerektiğini öngörebilmek için Berjano ve Lamartina sınıflamasından yararlanılabilinir. Literatürdeki serilere bakıldığında cerrahi tedavi yapılan hastaların yaşam kalitesi, konservatif takip edilen hastalara göre daha yüksek olduğu izlenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MALÇOK, Ü. A., YAMAN, O. (2022). Approach to Lumbar Degenerative Scoliosis. Türk Nöroşirürji Dergsi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 230–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/655108

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Aebi M: The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 14(10): 925-948, 2005 2. Agabegi SS, Kazemi N, Sturm PF, Mehlman CT: Natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in skeletally mature patients: A critical review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 23(2) 714- 723, 2015 3. Bao H, Yan P, Qiı Y, Liu Z, Zhu F: Coronal imbalance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Prevalence and influence on surgical decision-making for spinal osteotomy. Bone Joint J 98-B(9): 1227-1233, 2016 4. Berjano P, Lamartina C: Classification of degenerative segment disease in adults with deformity of the lumbar or thoracolumbar spine. Eur Spine J 23(9): 1815-1824, 2014 5. Carter OD, Haynes SG: Prevalence rates for scoliosis in US adults: Results from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Int J Epidemiol 16(4): 537-544, 1987 6. Cheung KM, Lenke LG, Luk KD: Prediction of scoliosis correction with thoracic segmental pedicle screw constructs using fulcrum bending radiographs. Spine 35(5): 557-561, 2010 7. Cho Kj, Suk SI, Park SR: Arthrodesis to L5 versus S1 in long instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 18: 531-537, 2009 8. Devlin VJ, Asher MA: Biomechanics and surgical principles of long fusions to the sacrum. Spine 10: 515-544, 1996 9. Edwards CC, Bridwell KH, Patel A: Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum. A matched cohort analysis. Spine 29: 1996-2005, 2004 10. Fu KM, Rhagavan P, Shaffrey CI, Chernavvsky DR, Smith JS: Prevalence, severity, and impact of foramina and canal stenosis among adults with degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurgery 69(6):1181-1187, 2011 11. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F: The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spine deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(18): 2024-2029, 2005 12. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K: Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 30: 682-688, 2005 13. Grubb SA, Lipscomb HJ, Coonrad RW: Degenerative adult onset scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13(3): 241-245, 1988 14. Horton WC, Brown CW, Bridwell KH, Glassman SD, Suk SI, Cha CW: Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36'' radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(4): 427-433, 2005 15. Kebaish KM: Sacropelvic fixation: Techniques and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35: 2245-2251, 2010 16. Kostuik JP: Treatment of scoliosis in the adult thoracolumbar spine with special reference to fusion to the