Journals / Türk Nöroloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

A Practical Tool for the Detection of Limbic-type-memory Deficit: 5-Word-Test

Limbik Tipte Bellek Bozukluğunun Saptanması için Pratik Bir Aygıt: 5 Kelime Testi

Pages
198–207
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The 5WT score differences between HPs and the combined patient groups, and among MCI and ATD severity stage groups were significant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The 5-Word-Test (5WT) is a quick and practical verbal memory assessment tool that was developed by Dubois et al.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: One hundred six healthy participants (HP), 22 with MCI and, 39 patients with ATD consented to participate in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The 5WT score differences between HPs and the combined patient groups, and among MCI and ATD severity stage groups were significant (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The 5-Word-Test (5WT) is a quick and practical verbal memory assessment tool that was developed by Dubois et al. The objective of this study was to establish the validity and reliability of its Turkish version with the purpose of acquiring a practical memory testing instrument that would discriminate the stages of the normal aging - mild cognitive impairment (MCI) - early Alzheimer-type dementia (ATD) continuum with high sensitivity and specificity. Materials and Methods: One hundred six healthy participants (HP), 22 with MCI and, 39 patients with ATD consented to participate in the study. Participants were evaluated using the 5WT, Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination, verbal fluency and 3 Words-3 Shapes tests. The simultaneous validity tests of the 5WT with other cognitive tests and test-retest validity of the test were investigated using Spearman’s rho correlation analysis. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used for group comparisons. For the discriminant ability of the 5WT, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) area under curve was measured. Results: In 5WT cued recall score (CRS), all HPs, and in free recall score (FRS) 95.3% of them received 10 points. The 5WT score differences between HPs and the combined patient groups, and among MCI and ATD severity stage groups were significant (p

Özet

Amaç: Dubois ve arkadaşları tarafından geliştirilen, hızlı ve pratik bir sözel bellek ölçeği olan 5 Kelime Testi’nin (5KT) Türkçe versiyonunun geçerlilik vegüvenilirliği oluşturularak normal yaşlanma, hafif kognitif bozukluk (HKB) ve Alzheimer tipi demans (ATD) sürekliliği evrelerini birbirlerinden yüksekduyarlılık ve özgüllükte ayıracak pratik bir enstrümanın elde edilmesi hedeflenmiştir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Yüz altı sağlıklı katılımcı, 22 HKB ve 39 ATD’li birey olmak üzere toplam 167 katılımcı 5KT, Standardize Mini-Mental Durum Testi, SözelAkıcılık [kategori akıcılığı (bir dakikadaki hayvan sayısı), bir dakikada meyve-insan ismi değişimli sayma, leksikal akıcılık (birer dakikada K-A-S ile başlayankelime sayısı)], 3 Kelime 3 Şekil testleri ile değerlendirildi. 5KT’nin diğer kognitif testlerle eş zamanlı geçerlilik testleri ve test-tekrar test geçerliliği, Spearmanrho testi ile testler arasındaki korelasyonlara bakılarak araştırıldı. Gruplar arası fark analizlerinde, veri dağılımına bakılarak parametrik ve non-parametrik testlerkullanıldı. 5KT’nin ayırt ediciliği için “Receiver Operating Characteristic” (ROC) eğri altında kalan alana bakıldı.Bulgular: 5KT ipuçlu hatırlama toplam puanında (İTP) sağlıklıların tümü, serbest hatırlama toplam puanında (STP) %95,3’ü 10 puan almıştır. Sağlıklıbireylerin ve hastaların, HKB ile farklı evrelerdeki ATD’lilerin, 5KT puanları arasındaki fark anlamlı bulunmuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYSERİLİ, G., YILDIRIM, Z., ÇİLENGİROĞLU, Ö. V., YENER, G. G. (2022). A Practical Tool for the Detection of Limbic-type-memory Deficit: 5-Word-Test. Türk Nöroloji Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 198–207. https://ajindex.com/articles/655051

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. World Alzheimer Report 2018. Alzheimer’s Disease International. Erişim Tarihi: 20.01.2019. Available from:
  2. Prince M, Albanese E, Guerchet M, et al. World Alzheimer Report 2014. Dementia and risk reduction. An analysis of protective and modifiable factors. Alzheimer’s Disease International (ADI), London, September 2014
  3. Jack CR, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:119-128
  4. Sahin HA, Gurvit IH, Emre M, et al. The attitude of elderly lay people towards the symptoms of dementia. Int Psychogeriatr 2006;18:251-258
  5. Jack CR, Albert MS, Knopman DS, et al. Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011;7:257-262
  6. Buschke H. Cued recall in amnesia. J Clin Neuropsychol 1984;6:433-440
  7. Grober E, Buschke H. Genuine memory deficits in dementia. Developmental Neuropsychology 1987;3:13-36
  8. Van Harten AC, Smits LL, Teunissen CE, et al. Preclinical AD predicts decline in memory and executive functions in subjective complaints. Neurology 2013;81:1409-1416
  9. Vos SJB, Xiong C, Visser PJ, et al. Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease and its outcome: A longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:957-965
  10. Benzinger TLS, Blazey T, Jack CR, et al. Regional variability of imaging biomarkers in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:E4502-4509
  11. Ikonomovic M, Abrahamson E, Kofler J, et al. Neuropathology and biochemical correlations of [F-18]AV-1451 and [C-11]PiB PET imaging in a subject with Alzheimer’s disease. In: Johnson KA, Jagust WJ, Klunk WE, Mathis CA, eds. 11th Human Amyloid Imaging. Miami, Florida 2017;157
  12. Burnham SC, Bourgeat P, Doré V, et al. Clinical and cognitive trajectories in cognitively healthy elderly individuals with suspected non-Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology (SNAP) or Alzheimer’s disease pathology: a longitudinal study. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:1044-1053
  13. Mormino EC, Papp KV, Rentz DM, et al. Heterogeneity in suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology among clinically normal older individuals. JAMA Neurol 2016;73:1185-1191
  14. Erkal B. Nöropsikolojik testlerin klinik psikolojide -tanı ve tedavidekullanımı. Kriz Dergisi 1995;3:155-158
  15. Can H, İrkeç C, Karakas S. Alzheimer tipi demansın farklı evrelerinin