The difference between the circle hooks and the "J" hooks was found to be statisticaly significant (p
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out between September 1999 and December 2000.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Number 1 circle hooks and "J" hooks used on longlines was compared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The difference between the circle hooks and the "J" hooks was found to be statisticaly significant (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
This study was carried out between September 1999 and December 2000. Number 1 circle hooks and "J" hooks used on longlines was compared. The difference between the circle hooks and the "J" hooks was found to be statisticaly significant (p
Özet
Bu çalışma Eylül 1999 ile Aralık 2000 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Paraketalarda kullanılan l numara çapraz ve l numara "J" iğneler karşılaştınlmıştır Yapılan z-testi sonucunda çapraz iğneler ile "J" iğneler arasındaki farkın istatistiksel olarak önemli olduğu (p
🔖
Cite This Article
AKAR, M., SARIHAN, E., ÖZYURT, C. E. (2022). The possibilities of using longline at pike-perch (Sander lucioperca, Bogustkaya & Naseka,1996) fishing at Seyhan Dam Lake. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1-2, 43–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/654259
Anonim, 1988. D.S.İ. Fisheries Statistics (in Turkish). D.S.İ. Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
Avşar, D., 1988. Fisheries Biology and Population Dynamics (in Turkish). Ç.Ü. Su Ürünleri Fak. Ders Kitabı, No: 5, Baki Kitap Evi, Adana, 303s. Avşar, D., Özyurt, C. E., 1999. Seyhan Dam Lake (Adana) Fisheries (in Turkish). X. Ulusal Su Ürünleri Sempozyumu, 22-24 Eylül 1999
Adana, Cilt: 1,225-235.
Bjordal, A., Lokkeborg, S., 1996.
Longlining. Fishing New Books, A Division of Blackwell Science Ltd, London, 156p. Dokumacı, S., 1999. Researching catch productivity and catch composition of turbot longline using different type of hooks and baits (in Turkish). Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi,
Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 62s. Fernö, A., Olsen, S., 1994. Marine Fish Behavior in Capture and Abundance Estimation. Fishing New Book, A Division of Blackwell Science Ltd, London, 221p. Geldiay, R., Balık, S., 1988. Freshwater Fish of Turkey (in Turkish). Ege Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi, Ders Kitabı, No: 97, E. Ü. Basımevi, İzmir, 519s. Göner, S., Samsun, O., 1996. A comparison on the catch composition of differently desing longlines (in Turkish). E.Ü. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, CiltNo:13, Sayı:l-2,131-148.
Lokkeborg, S., Bjordal, A., 1992. Species and size selectivity in longline fishing: a review. Fisheries Researc, 13, 311-322.
Özdemir, F., 1999 Some Biological Charecteristics in Pike-Perch (Stizostedion lucioperca, Lin., 1758) Populaton in the Lake of Seyhan Dam (in Turkish). Ç.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Su Ürünleri Ana Bilim Dalı, 43s. Özyurt, C, E., 2000. Identification of the Suitable Mesh Size for the Carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758) and Pike-Perch {Sander lucioperca Bogustkaya & Naseka, 1996) inhabiting in Seyhan Dam Lake (in Turkish). Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Su Ürünleri Ana Bilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adana, 68s. Sarıhan, E., Kumova, U., 1984.
A Study on the Metric, Meristic and Weight/Length Relation of Pike-Perch (Lucioperca lucioperca Lin. 1758) Population in Seyhan Dam Lake (in Turkish). Ç.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Doğa ve Bilim Dergisi, A2, 8,2, Adana, 215-221.
Sarıhan, E., Toral, Ö., 1973. The first result that had been gathered after the pike-perch Lucioperca lucioperca L., 1758 placed in Seyhan Dam Lake. IV. Bilim Kongresi, 5-8