SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Istanbul Business Research / 2017 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

The Interaction between Supervisor Undermining and Supervisor Support: The Moderating Role of Prevention Focus

İlk Yönetici Baltalaması ile Desteği Arasındaki Etkileşim: Önleme Odağının Biçimlendirici Rolü

Engin Bağış ÖZTÜRK
Gökhan KARAGONLAR
Pages
34–46
Publication Date
2017-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our findings contribute to a greater understanding concerning when support and undermining from the same supervisor leads to negative outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present research examines the moderator effects of chronic prevention focus and supervisor support on the relationship between supervisor undermining and turnover intention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results of analyses on a sample of 163 health employees from two different institutions suggest that supervisor support may increase the harmful effect of supervisor undermining on turnover intention only among employees with a high chronic prevention focus.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our findings contribute to a greater understanding concerning when support and undermining from the same supervisor leads to negative outcomes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İlk Yönetici Baltalaması · İlk Yönetici Desteği · Düzenleyici Odak

Abstract

The present research examines the moderator effects of chronic prevention focus and supervisor support on the relationship between supervisor undermining and turnover intention. It was predicted that the aggravating influence of supervisor support in the relationship between supervisor undermining and turnover intention would depend on employee’s chronic prevention focus. The results of analyses on a sample of 163 health employees from two different institutions suggest that supervisor support may increase the harmful effect of supervisor undermining on turnover intention only among employees with a high chronic prevention focus. Our findings contribute to a greater understanding concerning when support and undermining from the same supervisor leads to negative outcomes.

Özet

Bu çalışma ilk yönetici baltalaması ile işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisinde kronik önleme odağı ile ilk yönetici desteğinin biçimlendirici rollerini incelemektedir. Bu çalışmada ilk yönetici baltalaması ile işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisinde ilk yönetici desteğinin kötüleştirici etkisinin çalışanların kronik önleme odağına bağlı olduğu iddia edilmektedir. İki farklı kurumdan toplanan 163 kişilik sağlık çalışanı örnekleminde yapılan analizlere göre sadece yüksek kronik önleme odağına sahip çalışanlarda, ilk yönetici desteğinin ilk yönetici baltalaması ile işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisi üzerindeki zararlı etkisi artmaktadır. Bu çalışmadaki bulgular aynı yöneticiden hem destek görmenin hem de baltalamaya maruz kalmanın hangi durumda olumsuz sonuçları olabileceğinin anlaşılmasına katkı sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, E. B., KARAGONLAR, G. (2017). The Interaction between Supervisor Undermining and Supervisor Support: The Moderating Role of Prevention Focus. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 34–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/65424

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Allen, D. G., Bryant, P. C., & Vardaman, J. M. (2010). Retaining Talent: Replacing Misconceptions With Evidence-Based Strategies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(2), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2010.51827775
  2. Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for Tat? The Spiraling Effect of Incivility in the Workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.2202131
  3. Beehr, T. A., Farmer, S. J., Glazer, S., Gudanowski, D. M., & Nair, V. N. (2003). The enigma of social support and occupational stress: Source congruence and gender role effects. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8(3), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.8.3.220
  4. Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 998–1012. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.998
  5. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
  6. Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory Focus Theory: Implications for the Study of Emotions at Work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2972
  7. Chappell, D., & Di Martino, V. (1998). Violence at work (Third Edit). Geneva: International Labour Organization. Cobb, S. (1976). Social Support as a Moderator of Life Stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38(5), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003
  8. Cohen, A. (1999). The Relation between Commitment Forms and Work Outcomes in Jewish and Arab Culture. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1998.1669
  9. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied Multiple Regression/correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
  10. Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
  11. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–