AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightIn this study, we will examine the problems that may arise and our solution suggestions regarding the subject.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
According to the Trade Unions and Collective Bargaining Law No. 6356, besides labours who are members of a party union, labours who pay solidarity dues are also given the opportunity to benefit from the collective labour agreements under certain conditions. However, by making an unnecessary distinction in the legal regulation, a negative situation has been created in terms of benefitting from the collective agreement that have been put into effect retroactively by paying solidarity dues. The Constitutional Court have accepted that the second sentence of Article 39 paragraph 4 of Law No. 6356 is unconstitutional and it is annulled on 30.12.2020. In this case, labours who pay solidarity dues are also given the opportunity to benefit from the collective agreement with retrospective effect. In this study, we will examine the problems that may arise and our solution suggestions regarding the subject.tions. However, by making an unnecessary distinction in the legal regulation, a negative situation has been created in terms of benefitting from the collective agreement that have been put into effect retroactively by paying solidarity dues. The Constitutional Court have accepted that the second sentence of Article 39 paragraph 4 of Law No. 6356 is unconstitutional and it is annulled on 30.12.2020. In this case, labours who pay solidarity dues are also given the opportunity to benefit from the collective agreement with retrospective effect. In this study, we will examine the problems that may arise and our solution suggestions regarding the subject.
Özet
6356 sayılı Sendikalar ve Toplu İş Sözleşmesi Kanunu’nda taraf sendikaya üye işçiler yanında belirli şartlar altında dayanışma aidatı ödeyen işçilere de toplu iş sözleşmesinden yararlanma imkânı tanınmıştır. Ancak yasal düzenlemede yararlanmanın başlangıcına ilişkin gereksiz bir ayrım yapılarak geçmişe etkili yürürlüğe konan sözleşmelerden dayanışma aidatı ödeyerek yararlanmayı engelleyen bir durum yaratılmıştır. Anayasa Mahkemesi, 6356 sayılı Kanun’un konuya ilişkin 39. maddesinin 4. fıkrasının 2. cümlesinin Anayasa’ya aykırı olduğunu kabul ederek 30.12.2020 tarihinde iptal etmiş; bunun sonucunda dayanışma aidatı ödeyen işçiler de geçmişe etkili olarak sözleşmeden yararlanma imkânına kavuşmuştur. Bu çalışmamızda iptal kararının isabetli olup olmadığını ve karar sonrası dayanışma aidatı ödeyerek yararlanma bakımından ortaya çıkabilecek sorunları irdeleyeceğiz.