Journals / Acta Medica / 2022 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3

Event-free Survival in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Front-line Imatinib Mesylate

Pages
277–283
Publication Date
2022-11-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Higher blast percentage in BM and increased basophil percentage in PB are independent risk factors, adversely related with EFS in patients with CML.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) prognostication at the time of diagnosis is critical to determine the intensity of initial treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Median follow-up time was 84 (IQR: 54-125) and median frontline therapeutic duration was 56 (IQR:23-89) months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Higher blast percentage in BM and increased basophil percentage in PB are independent risk factors, adversely related with EFS in patients with CML.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) prognostication at the time of diagnosis is critical to determine the intensity of initial treatment. Event-free survival (EFS) has become a prominent concept of prognosis in the patients with chronic phase CML (CML-CP). The aim of this study is to assess the prognostic impact of bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) cellular components, in correlation with the clinical parameters. Materials and Methods: One hundred forty-three patients with CMLCP on the front-line imatinib mesylate therapy were recruited into this study. Clinical and laboratory characteristics, therapeutic responses were recorded. Sokal, Euro/Hasford, The EUropean Treatment Outcome Study (EUTOS) and The EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) scores were calculated for the studied patients. Results: Median follow-up time was 84 (IQR: 54-125) and median frontline therapeutic duration was 56 (IQR:23-89) months. Five-year EFS rate was 62.3% (95% CI: 53.9-70.7). The blast percentage in the BM, EUTOS scores, and basophil percentage in PB were related with the poor therapeutic outcomes in frontline therapy (p=0.002, p=0.002 and p=0.042, respectively). Although Sokal risk classification showed that the intermediate class had a higher event risk compared to the lowrisk class (p=0.001), the predictive association disappeared in high-risk classes. Conclusion: EUTOS score system has better predictive capability for front-line imatinib therapy comparing with other indices. Higher blast percentage in BM and increased basophil percentage in PB are independent risk factors, adversely related with EFS in patients with CML.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇINAR, O. E., AKSU, S., BÜYÜKAŞIK, Y., EYÜPOĞLU, N. D., SAYINALP, N., DEMİROĞLU, H., GÖKER, H., ÖZCEBE, O. İ., HAZNEDAROĞLU, İ. C. (2022). Event-free Survival in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Front-line Imatinib Mesylate. Acta Medica, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3, 277–283. https://ajindex.com/articles/653823

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Zackova D, Klamova H, Belohlavkova P, Stejskal L, Necasova T, Semerad L, et al. Dasatinib treatment long-term results among imatinib-resistant/intolerant patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia are favorable in daily clinical practice. Leuk Lymphoma. 2021;62(1):194-202
  2. Hochhaus A, Larson RA, Guilhot F, Radich JP, Branford S, Hughes TP, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Imatinib Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(10):917-27
  3. Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver RT, Schiffer C, Apperley JF, Cervantes F, et al. European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2020;34(4):966-84
  4. Sokal JE, Cox EB, Baccarani M, Tura S, Gomez GA, Robertson JE, et al. Prognostic discrimination in” good-risk” chronic granulocytic leukemia. 1984
  5. Hasford J, Pfirrmann M, Hehlmann R, Allan NC, Baccarani M, Kluin-Nelemans JC, et al. A new prognostic score for survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with interferon alfa Writing Committee for the Collaborative CML Prognostic Factors Project Group. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1998;90(11):850- 9
  6. Uz B, Buyukasik Y, Atay H, Kelkitli E, Turgut M, Bektas O, et al. EUTOS CML prognostic scoring system predicts ELNbased ‘event-free survival’ better than Euro/Hasford and Sokal systems in CML patients receiving front-line imatinib mesylate. Hematology. 2013;18(5):247-52
  7. Pfirrmann M, Baccarani M, Saussele S, Guilhot J, Cervantes F, Ossenkoppele G, et al. Prognosis of long-term survival considering disease-specific death in patients with c hronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2016;30(1):48-56
  8. Hasford J, Baccarani M, Hoffmann V, Guilhot J, Saussele S, Rosti G, et al. Predicting complete cytogenetic response and subsequent progression-free survival in 2060 patients with CML on imatinib treatment: the EUTOS score. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. 2011;118(3):686-92
  9. Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Rosti G, Hochhaus A, Soverini S, Apperley JF, et al. European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013. Blood. 2013;122(6):872-84
  10. Huang J, Zhao X. [Efficacy of three prognostic scoring systems on evaluating the prognosis for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016;41(8):809-14
  11. Sato E, Iriyama N, Tokuhira M, Takaku T, Ishikawa M, Nakazato T, et al. The EUTOS long term survival score predicts disease s