Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Developing countries and brain drain: Example of Turkey

Gelişmekte olan ülkeler ve beyin göçü: Türkiye örneği

Pages
961–974
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most important reasons of brain drainin Turkey are; the pressure of unemployment on educated people, the researchers’ not havingenough working condition due to inadequate sources assigned for AR-GE, low life standardcaused by low human development and political and economical instability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study the concept of brain drain is evaluated in the sense of developing countries.The most important advantages supplied to developing countries by international immigrationare; to provide employment opportunity for unemployed citizens, for employee transfers andemployees who come to the country to bring foreign ability and experience back to their home.In spite of this the concept of “brain drain” which is seen as a result of educated and qualifiedpeople sources’ going to foreign countries and not coming back is the most important basiswho are against international immigration.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Developed countries, being USA in the first place, which haveprevented unqualified employee immigration today, are competing with each other in orderto increase the share they get from brain drain.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most important reasons of brain drainin Turkey are; the pressure of unemployment on educated people, the researchers’ not havingenough working condition due to inadequate sources assigned for AR-GE, low life standardcaused by low human development and political and economical instability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study the concept of brain drain is evaluated in the sense of developing countries.The most important advantages supplied to developing countries by international immigrationare; to provide employment opportunity for unemployed citizens, for employee transfers andemployees who come to the country to bring foreign ability and experience back to their home.In spite of this the concept of “brain drain” which is seen as a result of educated and qualifiedpeople sources’ going to foreign countries and not coming back is the most important basiswho are against international immigration. This process which emerged as the free exportationof human, the main dynamics of development, worsen the situation of developing countries such as Turkey more and more. Developed countries, being USA in the first place, which haveprevented unqualified employee immigration today, are competing with each other in orderto increase the share they get from brain drain. The most important reasons of brain drainin Turkey are; the pressure of unemployment on educated people, the researchers’ not havingenough working condition due to inadequate sources assigned for AR-GE, low life standardcaused by low human development and political and economical instability.

Özet

Bu çalışmada beyin göçü olgusu gelişmekte olan ülkeler açısından değerlendirilmiştir.Uluslararası göçün gelişmekte olan ülkelere sağladığı en önemli yararlar; İşsiz vatandaşlarayurtdışı istihdam imkânları yaratması, ülkeye gelen işçi havaleleri ile işçilerin ülkelerine geridöndüklerinde getirdikleri yurt dışı yetenek ve deneyim kazanımlardır. Buna karşın eğitimli vevasıflı insan kaynaklarının yabancı ülkelere gitmesi ve geri dönmemesi şeklinde ortaya çıkan“Beyin göçü” olgusu uluslararası göçe karşı çıkanların en önemli dayanağıdır. Gelişmenintemel dinamiği olan beşeri sermayenin bedava ihraç edilmesi şeklinde ortaya çıkan bu süreç,Türkiye gibi gelişmekte olan ülkelerin durumunu daha da kötüleştirmektedir. Günümüzde baştaABD olmak üzere vasıfsız işçi göçünü engelleyen gelişmiş ülkeler beyin göçünden aldıklarıpayı arttırmak için birbiriyle yarışmaktadırlar. Türkiye’de beyin göçünün en önemli nedenleri;eğitimli insanların üzerindeki işsizlik baskısı, AR-GE’ye ayrılan yetersiz kaynaklar sonucuaraştırmacıların yeterli çalışma şartlarına sahip olmamaları, düşük insani gelişmenin yarattığıdüşük hayat standardı ile siyasal ve ekonomik istikrarsızlıklardır

🔖

Cite This Article

KANDEMİR, O., BAKIRTAŞ, T. (2022). Developing countries and brain drain: Example of Turkey. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 961–974. https://ajindex.com/articles/652871

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Kaya, M. “Beyin Göçü/Erozyonu”, İş Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergi- si, Yıl: 2003/ Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 Sıra: 13 / No: 152
  2. Martin, P. “The Effects Of Mıgratıon On Sendıng Countrıes: A Comparıson of Mexıco and Turkey”, Well-Beıng And Socıal Polıcy, 2006(a), Vol 2, No. 2, s. 89–101, http://well- being.ciss.org.mx/pdf/en/2006/vol_2_num_2_5_06_en.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi:23.02.2009)
  3. Martin, P. L. “The Trade, Migration, and Development Nexus”, Edited by Hollifield, Ja- mes F., Pia M. Orrenius ve Thomas Osang, Migration, Trade, and Development, Pro- ceedings of a Conference Hosted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, October 6, (2006(b), Published December 2007. s.11-34. http://www.dallasfed.org/research/pubs/ migration/migration.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2009)
  4. Taylor, J. E. “İnternational Migration And Economic Development”, İnternational Sympo- sium On İnternational Migration And Development, Population Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs United Nations Secretariat, Turin, Italy, 28-30 June. 2006, http://www.un.org/esa/population/migration/turin/Symposium_Turin_files/P09_ SYMP_Taylor.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi:20.09.2007)
  5. Lucas, R. E. B. “International Labor Migration İn A Globalizing Economy”, Carnegie Pa- pers, Trade, Equity, And Development Program Number 92, July 2008, s.1–27. http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/international_migration_globalizing_econ omy.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2009)
  6. Hollifield, J. F., P.M. Orrenius and T. Osang “Migration, Trade, and Development: An Overview” Edited by Hollifield, James F., Pia M. Orrenius ve Thomas Osang, Migration, Trade, and Development, Proceedings of a Conference Hosted by The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, October 6, 2006, Published December 2007. s.3-8. http://www.dallasfed. org/research/pubs/migration/migration.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2009)
  7. Xenogiani, T. “Migration Policy and İts İnteractions With Aid, Trade And Foreign Direct İnvestment Policies: A Background Paper”, OECD Development Center, Working Paper No. 249, June 2006. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/60/28/37036220.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.09.2007)
  8. Marfouk, A. “İnternational Migration And Brain Drain From Developing Countri- es”, Université Libre De Bruxelles (ULB) Austrian Research Foundation For Interna- tional Development Conference October 15, 2008, Vienna. http://www.oefse.at/Down- loads/veranstaltungen/1510/Marfouk_Presentation_15.10.08_NEU.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2009)
  9. UNESCO, “Towards