SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Assessment of Salivary Pellicle on the Surface of Dental Alloys, in vivo

Nasser HAGHİGHAT
Fulya BASMACI
Asiye Nehir ÖZDEN
Ibtisam AL-HASHİMİ
Pages
27–32
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ni-Cr pellicle.Conclusion: The result of this study suggest there is selectivity in salivary protein adsorption to Co-Cr and Ni-Cr dental prostheses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The molecular composition of the salivary pellicle adsorbed on the surface of dental alloys is determined by the chemical structure of the alloy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study is to compare the composition of salivary pellicle on two dental alloys, chrome cobalt (Co-Cr) and nickel chromium (Ni-Cr) surfaces.Materials and Methods: Protein profile of 2 hour salivary pellicle on customized Co-Cr and Ni-Cr palatal plates were kept in the mouth of healthy volunteers for two hours.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ni-Cr pellicle.Conclusion: The result of this study suggest there is selectivity in salivary protein adsorption to Co-Cr and Ni-Cr dental prostheses.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The molecular composition of the salivary pellicle adsorbed on the surface of dental alloys is determined by the chemical structure of the alloy. The purpose of this study is to compare the composition of salivary pellicle on two dental alloys, chrome cobalt (Co-Cr) and nickel chromium (Ni-Cr) surfaces.Materials and Methods: Protein profile of 2 hour salivary pellicle on customized Co-Cr and Ni-Cr palatal plates were kept in the mouth of healthy volunteers for two hours. Pellicle was used to compare the parotid and the whole saliva using SDS-PAGE (sodiumdodecylsulphate-poyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) and Western blot analysis.Results: Only a limited number of salivary proteins was observed in both Co-Cr and Ni-Cr pellicle. In addition, there were differences in proteins observed Co-Cr pellicle vs. Ni-Cr pellicle.Conclusion: The result of this study suggest there is selectivity in salivary protein adsorption to Co-Cr and Ni-Cr dental prostheses.

🔖

Cite This Article

HAGHİGHAT, N., BASMACI, F., ÖZDEN, A. N., AL-HASHİMİ, I. (2022). Assessment of Salivary Pellicle on the Surface of Dental Alloys, in vivo. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 27–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/652310

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Glickman I. Clinical Periodontology. Clinical P. Philadelphia-London: W. B. Saunders Co; 1972. 290–311 p
  2. Ericson T MK. Saliva, formation, composition and possible role. In: Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O, editors. Textbook of Cariology. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1986. 28–32 p
  3. Edgerton M, Tabak LA, Levine MJ. Saliva: a significant factor in removable prosthodontic treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:57–66. [CrossRef ] 4. Edgerton M, Levine MJ. Biocompatibility: its future in prosthodontic research. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:406–415. [CrossRef ] 5. Al-Hashimi I, Levine MJ. Characterization of in vivo salivary-derived enamel pellicle. Arch Oral Biol 1989;34:289–295. [CrossRef ] 6. Gibbons RJ. Bacterial adhesion to oral tissues: a model for infectious diseases. J Dent Res 1989;68:750–760. [CrossRef ] 7. Ueda A. Adsorption of salivary proteins and serum proteins to titanium. J Osaka Dent Univ 1998;32:59–65
  4. Ozden AN, Haghighat N, Al-Hashimi I. Preliminary evaluation of salivary pellicle on nickel-chromium alloy in vivo. Quintessence Int 2002;33:731–735
  5. Olsson J, van der Heijde Y, Holmberg K. Plaque formation in vivo and bacterial attachment in vitro on permanently hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. Caries Res 1992;26:428–433. [CrossRef ] 10. Shahal Y, Steinberg D, Hirschfeld Z, Bronshteyn M, Kopolovic K. In vitro bacterial adherence onto pellicle-coated aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:52–58. [CrossRef ] 11. Lee SJ, Kho HS, Lee SW, Yang WS. Experimental salivary pellicles on the surface of orthodontic materials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:59–66. [CrossRef ] 12. Yoo J-H, Kho H-S, Kim Y-K, Lee S-W, Chung S-C. Experimental salivary pellicles formed on the surface of self-curing resin. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:251–259. [CrossRef ] 13. Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, et al. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem 1985;150:76–85. [CrossRef ] 14. Steinberg D, Mor C, Dogan H, Zacks B, Rotstein I. Effect of salivary biofilm on the adherence of oral bacteria to bleached and non-bleached restorative material. Dent Mater 1999;15:14–20. [CrossRef ] 15. Steinberg D, Eyal S. Early formation of Streptococcus sobrinus biofilm on various dental restorative materials. J Dent 2002;30:47–51. [CrossRef ] 16. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17 Suppl 2:68–81. [CrossRef ] 17. Zhang N, Melo M