Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 2009 - Sayı: 36

Interpersonal relationship of high schools' teachers and teachers' profile

Lise öğretmenlerinin kişilerarası davranışları ve öğretmen profilleri

Pages
260–270
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that students’ perceptions were associated with their attitudes and several different types of interpersonal profiles could be distinguished in Turkish science classes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study was to examine associations between Turkish high school students' perceptions of their teachers' interpersonal behavior and drawn attention to the relationship between students’ affective outcomes and teachers’ interpersonal behavior.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 674 students from 24 classes in two general high school participated in study with their 13 teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that students’ perceptions were associated with their attitudes and several different types of interpersonal profiles could be distinguished in Turkish science classes.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine associations between Turkish high school students' perceptions of their teachers' interpersonal behavior and drawn attention to the relationship between students’ affective outcomes and teachers’ interpersonal behavior. The Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI), evaluate teachers’ behavior on two main dimensions: Dominance/ Submission (Influence) and Cooperation/Opposition (Proximity). A total of 674 students from 24 classes in two general high school participated in study with their 13 teachers. It was found that students’ perceptions were associated with their attitudes and several different types of interpersonal profiles could be distinguished in Turkish science classes. Three types of teachers could be found in the sample such as Directive, Authoritative and Tolerant/Authoritative teachers. The result of the analysis also indicated that Turkish teachers were perceived by their students as very cooperative and dominant.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı lise öğrencilerinin algılarına dayanarak öğretmen profillerini belirlemek ve bunların öğrencilerin duyuşsal kazanımları ile olan ilişkisini incelemektir. Çalışmada kullanılan Öğretmen Etkileşim Ölçeği (QTI), öğretmen davranışlarını Baskı/Uyum (Etki) ve İşbirliği/Karşıtlık (Yakınlık) olmak üzere iki ana boyutta incelemektedir. Çalışmanın örneklemini iki genel lisenin 24 sınıfında öğrenim gören toplam 674 öğrenci ve bu sınıfların 13 ders öğretmeni oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, lise öğrencileri öğretmenlerini oldukça yardımsever, işbirlikçi ve aynı zamanda kendi üzerlerinde kontrollü olarak algılamaktadır. Örneklemde Emir Verici, Otoriter ve Toleranslı/Otoriter olmak üzere üç farklı öğretmen tipi belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, ölçeğin boyutları ile öğrencilerin derslerine yönelik tutumları arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

TELLİ, S., BROK, P. D., ÇAKIROĞLU, J. (2022). Interpersonal relationship of high schools' teachers and teachers' profile. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2009 - Sayı: 36, 260–270. https://ajindex.com/articles/651304

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Beyazturk, D. ve Kesner, J. E. (2005). Teacher-child relationships in Turkish and United States schools: A cross-cultural study, International Education Journal, 6, 547-554.
  2. Blackburn, R., ve Renwick, S. J. (1996). Rating scales for measuring the interpersonal circle in forensic psychiatric patients. Psychological Assessment, 8, 76-84.
  3. Brekelmans, M., Levy, J., ve Rodriguez, R. ( 1993). A typology of teacher communication style. In T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education. (pp. 46 -55 ). London: The Falmer Press Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T., ve Brok, P. den (2002). Teacher experience and the teacher-student relationship in the classroom environment. In S. C. Goh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective (pp.73-100). Singapore: New World Scientific. den Brok, P. (2001). Teaching and student outcomes. Utrecht, the Netherlands: W. C. C. den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., ve Wubbels, Th. (2004). Interpersonal teacher behaviour and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 407-442. den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., ve Wubbels, Th. (2004). Interpersonal teacher behaviour and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 407-442. den Brok, P. J., den Levy, J., Rodriguez, R., ve Wubbels, T. (2002). Perceptions of Asian-American and Hispanic-American teachers and their students on interpersonal communication style. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 447-467. den Brok, P., Fisher, D., ve Scott, R. (2005). The importance of teacher interpersonal behaviour for student attitudes in Brunei primary Science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 765-779.
  4. Eyibakışlı, B. (1991). A reliability Study of the Teacher Behaviour Observation Scale (TeBOS). Unpublished master thesis Istanbul: Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey. Evans, H., ve Fisher, D. (2000). Cultural differences in students’ perceptions of science teachers’ interpersonal behaviour. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 46, 9-18.
  5. Fisher, D. L., Fraser, B. J., ve Wubbels, Th. (1993). Associations between school learning environment and teacher interpersonal behaviour in the classroom. In T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what you look like? (pp.103-112). London: The Falmer Press.
  6. Gaines, S. O., Panter, A. T., Lyde, M. D., Steers, W. N., Rusbult, C. E., Cox, C. L., ve Wexler, M. O. (1997). Evaluating the circumplexity of interpersonal tra