SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

-

TÜRKİYE’DE SANAYİ SEKTÖRÜ EKOMİK BÜYÜME VE VERİMLİLİK İLİŞKİSİNİN KALDOR YASALARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE SINANMASI: EKONOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ

Mehmet Mercan
Oktay Kızılkaya
Pages
137–160
Publication Date
2015-03-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the end of the analysis, a positive relation between growth of manufacturing output and economic growth in accordance with the literature has been obtained and all three laws have been determined to be valid

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The importance of manufacturing sector growth for sustainable economic growth is often emphasized in economic literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although the relation between economic growth and growth of manufacturing has been examined both theoretically and empirically, it is Kaldor who has first suggested the existence of this relation (1966).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end of the analysis, a positive relation between growth of manufacturing output and economic growth in accordance with the literature has been obtained and all three laws have been determined to be valid
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kaldor Yasaları · Sanayi Sektörü · Verimlilik

Abstract

The importance of manufacturing sector growth for sustainable economic growth is often emphasized in economic literature. Although the relation between economic growth and growth of manufacturing has been examined both theoretically and empirically, it is Kaldor who has first suggested the existence of this relation (1966). Kaldor has pointed out manufacturing sector as the engine of economic growth. Besides the relation between economic growth and growth of manufacturing Kaldor, in his study, has searched the effects of manufacturing output’s growth on labour force productivity of manufacturing sector and total productivity. In this study, in addition to Kaldor’s first law, validity of his other two laws that examine the effect of growth of manufacturing output on manufacturing sector labour force productivity and efficiency of economy as a whole has been searched through Johansen co-integration analysis in Turkish Economy case and long and short-term Granger causality test based on error correction model. In the study, quarterly data of 1988Q1 - 2013Q3 period has been used. At the end of the analysis, a positive relation between growth of manufacturing output and economic growth in accordance with the literature has been obtained and all three laws have been determined to be valid

Özet

Sürdürülebilir ekonomik büyüme için sanayi sektörünün gelişmesinin önemiiktisat yazınında sıklıkla vurgulanmaktadır. Ekonomik büyüme-sanayi sektörü ilişkisi birçok çalışmada teorik ve ampirik düzeyde incelenmesine rağmen bu ilişkinin varlığını ilk kez Kaldor (1966) ortaya atmıştır. Kaldor ekonomik büyümenin motoru olarak sanayi sektörüne işaret etmiştir. Kaldor çalışmasında, ekonomik büyüme sanayi sektörü ilişkisinin yanı sıra, sanayi sektörünün büyümesinin, sanayi sektörü işgücü verimliliği ve toplam verimlilik üzerindeki etkilerini de incelemiştir.Bu çalışmada; Kaldor’un birinci yasasının yanı sıra imalat sanayi üretimartışı ile imalat sanayi işgücü verimliliği ve bir bütün olarak ekonominin verimliliğiilişkisini inceleyen diğer iki yasasının da geçerliliği, Türkiye Ekonomisi örneğindeJohansen Eş-bütünleşme analizi ve hata düzeltme modeline dayalı uzun ve kısa dönemGranger Nedensellik testi ile incelenmiştir. Çalışmada; 1988Q1-2013Q3 dönemi üçaylık verileri kullanılmış, analiz sonucunda sanayi sektörü ve ekonomik büyümearasında literatüre paralel olarak pozitif ilişki elde edilmiş ayrıca, her üç yasanın da geçerli olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Mercan, M., Kızılkaya, O. (2015). -. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 137–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/6498

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. ALTUNÇ, Ö. F. (2008), Türkiye’de Finansal ve İktisadi Büyüme Arasındaki Nedenselliğin Ampirik Bir Analizi, EOGÜ, İİBF Dergisi, 3(2), s.113-127.
  2. ARISOY, İ. (2008), Türkiye’de Sanayi Sektörü-İktisadi Büyüme İlişkisinin Kaldor Hipotezi Çerçevesinde Test Edilmesi, Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu, Tartışma Metni, s.2. ATEŞOĞLU, H. S. (1993), Manufacturing and Economic Growth in the United States, Applied Economics, 25, s.67-69.
  3. BAIRAM, E. (1991), Economic Growth and Kaldor’s Law: The case of Turkey: 1925-78,
  4. Applied Economics, Vol.23 No:8, s.1277-1280.
  5. CARRION-I-SILVESTRE, J. L., KIM, D., ve PERRON, P.(2009), GLS-Based Unit Root Tests with Multiple Structural Breaks Under Both the Null and the Alternative Hypotheses, Econometric Theory, 25, s.1754-1792.
  6. CHAREMZA, W.W. ve D. DEADMAN (1997), New Directions in Econometric Practice, 2. Baskı,
  7. Edward Elgar Yayınevi,
  8. İngiltere. CHENERY, H. B. (1960),
  9. Patterns of industrial growth, The American Economic Review, 50(4): s.624-654.
  10. CLARK, C. (1961), Growthmanship. A Study in the Mythology of Investment, London: Barrie and Rockliff for the IEA. CRIPPS, T.F. ve TARLING R. (1973), Growth in Advanced Capitalist Economies 1950–70, Occasional Paper 40, Cambridge University Pres. ÇETİN, M. (2009), Kaldor Büyüme Yasasının Ampirik Analizi: Türkiye ve AB Ülkeleri Örneği (1981-2007),
  11. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi (C.X I,S I, 2009), s.355-373.
  12. DORUK, Ö.T., KARDAŞLAR, A. ve KANDIR, E.D. (2013), Turkish Economy’s Great Transformation: Industry, Agriculture And Economic Growth In The Process After 1980, A Review From The Perspectıve Of Kaldor’s First Growth Law, The Empirical Economics Letters, cilt no.12, sayı 6, s.587-592.
  13. DRAKOPOULOS, S. A. ve THEODOSSIOU, I. (1991), Kaldorian Approach to Greek Economic Growth, Applied Economics, No.23, s.1683-1689.
  14. ENDERS, W. (2010)
  15. Applied Econometric Time Series, John Willey and Song, Inc.,s.375,401. ENER, M. ve ARICA, F. (2011), Is The Kaldor’s Law Valid for High Income Economies: A Panel Study, Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT, 2011:1, s.60-64.
  16. ENGLE, R.F. ve GRANGER, C.W.J. (1987) Co-Integration and Error Correction: Represention, Estimation and Testing, Econometrica, 55(2), s.251-276.
  17. GRANGER, C. W. J. (1969), Investigating Causal Relationships by Econometric Models and Cross Spectral Methods, Econometica:37, 424-438.
  18. GRANGER, C. W. J. (1988), Some Recent Developments in a Concept of Causality, Journal of Econometrics, 39, s.199–211.
  19. GUO, D., DALL’ERBA, S. ve LE GALLO,