SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Dutch disease risk in Central Asian Turkish Republics: An empirical analysis

Orta Asya Türk Cumhuriyetlerinde Hollanda hastalığı riski: Ampirik bir analiz

Mehmet MERCAN
İsmet GÖÇER
Pages
251–274
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found thattrade openness; foreign direct investments and government expenditures havepositive impact on the real exchange rate in these countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, Dutch disease hypothesis tested for the Central Asian TurkishRepublics via panel data analysis methods for 1990-2010 periods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result ofthe analysis, an increase in crude oil price negatively affects the real exchangerate and Dutch Disease hypothesis invalid in these countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found thattrade openness; foreign direct investments and government expenditures havepositive impact on the real exchange rate in these countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, Dutch disease hypothesis tested for the Central Asian TurkishRepublics via panel data analysis methods for 1990-2010 periods. As a result ofthe analysis, an increase in crude oil price negatively affects the real exchangerate and Dutch Disease hypothesis invalid in these countries. It was found thattrade openness; foreign direct investments and government expenditures havepositive impact on the real exchange rate in these countries.

Özet

Bu çalış mada Hollanda hastalığı hipotezi, Orta Asya Türk Cumhuriyetleriiçin, 1990-2011 dönemi verileriyle, panel veri analizi yöntemiyle test edilmiş tir.Analiz sonucunda, bu ülkelerde petrol fiyatlarındaki artış ların, reel döviz kurununegatif yönde etkilediği ve söz konusu hipotezin geçerli olmadığı tespitedilmiş tir. Ticari dış a açıklık, doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve kamuharcamalarının ise reel döviz kurunu pozitif yönde etkilediği bulgusunaula ş ılmış tır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MERCAN, M., GÖÇER, İ. (2022). Dutch disease risk in Central Asian Turkish Republics: An empirical analysis. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 251–274. https://ajindex.com/articles/533088

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adenauer, I., L. Vagassky (1998) “Aid and the Real Exchange Rate: Dutch Effects in Afrian Countries”, Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policiy, 33(4), 177-185.
  2. Arı, A., B. Özcan (2012) “Hollanda Hastalığı: Geliş mekte Olan Ülkeler Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Sosyoekonomi, 2, 153-172.
  3. Atkinson, G., K. Hamilton (2003) “Savings, Growth and The Resource Curse Hypothesis”, World Development, 31(11), 1793-1807.
  4. Baltagi, B.H. (2001) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, (2d ed) New York: John Wiley&Sons. Baltagi, B.H. (2005) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, (3d ed) New York: John Wiley&Sons. Beyaert, A., M. Camacho (2008) “TAR Panel Unit Root Tests and Real Convergence: An Application to the EU Enlargement Process”, Review of Development Economics, 12(3), 668-681.
  5. Breitung, J. (2000) “The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data”, in B. Baltagi (ed.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels”, Advances in Econometrics, 15, Amsterdam: Jai, 161-178.
  6. Choi, I. (2001) “Unit Roots Tests For Panel Data”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 229–272. Collier, P., A. Hoeffler (2004) “Greed and Grievance in Civil War”, Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 563–95. Corden, W.M., J.P. Neary (1982) “Booming Sector and De-Industrialisation in a Small Open Economy”, The Economic Journal, 92(368), 825-848.
  7. De Gregorio, J., H. Wolf (1994) “Terms of Trade, Productivity, and the Real Exchange Rate”, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, No. 4807. Demirtepe, M.T. (2008) Orta Asya ve Kafkasya'da Güç Politikası, No:16, Ankara:
  8. USAK Yayınları.
  9. Elbadawi, I.A. (1999) “External Aid: Help or Hindrance to Export Orientation in Africa”, Journal of African Economies, 8(4), 578-616.
  10. Egert, B. (2005) “Equilibrium Exchange Rates in South Eastern Europe, Russia, Ukraine and Turkey: Healthy or (Dutch) Diseased?” Economic Systems, 29(2), 205–241. Elbadawi, I.E., M. Soto (1997) “Real Exchange Rates and Macroeconomic Adjustments in Sub-Sahran Africa and Other Developing Countries”, Journal of African Economics, 6,1-56.
  11. Emre, A. (2012) “Devrimlerden Sonra Arap Baharı”, DÜBAM (Dünya Bülteni Ara ş tırma Masası) Yayınları.
  12. Gylfason, T. (2004) “Natural Resources and Economic Growth: From Dependence to Diversification”, CEPR Discussion paper, No. 4804. Greene, W.H. (2003) Econometric Analysis, (5th Ed) Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice- Hall. Gujarati, D.N. (1999)
  13. Basic Econometrics, Mc Graw Hill. (3rd Ed.), İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılı