Journals / Damar Cerrahi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Karotis-Subklaviyan baypas klinik sonuçlarımız

The results of Carotid-Subclavian bypass in a single ınstitute

Pages
285–291
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patients to have thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) procedures with a requirement of intentional left subclavian artery (LSA) coverage were primarily operated for carotico-subclavian graft interposition to provide LSA revascularization, and subsequently TEVAR procedure was performed.Conclusion: Carotico-subclavian bypass is a safe procedure with good surgical results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We present our patients who underwent carotico-subclavian bypass operation either for subclavian steal syndrome or for subclavian artery revascularization prior to thoracic endovascular aneursym repair procedures.Material and Methods: We performed 16 carotico-subclavian bypass operations between August 2009-November 2013 in our department.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Nine patients were operated for subclavian steal syndrome with subclavian artery occlusion and 7 patients were operated before thoracic endovascular stent grafting for type III aortic dissection or the thoracic aneursym necessitating left subclavian artery occlusion.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patients to have thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) procedures with a requirement of intentional left subclavian artery (LSA) coverage were primarily operated for carotico-subclavian graft interposition to provide LSA revascularization, and subsequently TEVAR procedure was performed.Conclusion: Carotico-subclavian bypass is a safe procedure with good surgical results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We present our patients who underwent carotico-subclavian bypass operation either for subclavian steal syndrome or for subclavian artery revascularization prior to thoracic endovascular aneursym repair procedures.Material and Methods: We performed 16 carotico-subclavian bypass operations between August 2009-November 2013 in our department. Nine patients were operated for subclavian steal syndrome with subclavian artery occlusion and 7 patients were operated before thoracic endovascular stent grafting for type III aortic dissection or the thoracic aneursym necessitating left subclavian artery occlusion. Fourteen male (87.5%) and 2 female (12.5%) patients with their ages ranging between 55-74 (mean 66.3) years were operated. All operations were performed under general anesthesia with a supraclavicular incision. In 14 patients, 8-mm Dacron grafts were used and in 2 patients 8 mm polytetrafluoroethylene grafts were used. Anastomoses were done in end-to-side fashion.Results: Radial artery pulses were palpable in all the patients after the operation, and their complaints like left arm pain or dizziness were resolved. Early 30-day morbidity was 6.2 % with one patient experiencing puffiness and pain at the left shoulder two weeks after the operation, due to seroma which was drained percutaneously under ultrasonography guidance after diagnosis. No perioperative stroke or minor cerebrovascular events were observed. One patient who had a native carotid artery tortuosity and cerebral artery aneurysm suffered from carotid-subclavian bypass graft thrombosis 2 days after the operation, with an early graft thrombosis rate of 6.2 %. No carotid-subclavian procedure related mortalities were observed. Patients to have thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) procedures with a requirement of intentional left subclavian artery (LSA) coverage were primarily operated for carotico-subclavian graft interposition to provide LSA revascularization, and subsequently TEVAR procedure was performed.Conclusion: Carotico-subclavian bypass is a safe procedure with good surgical results.

Özet

Amaç: Subklaviyan çalma sendromu nedeniyle veya torasik endovasküler girişimlere ek olarak uyguladığımız karotis-subklaviyan baypas ameliyatı sonuçlarımızı sunmaktayız.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ağustos 2009-Kasım 2013 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde 16 hastada karotis-subklaviyan baypas ameliyatı yapıldı. Dokuz hastada subklaviyan arter stenozu sonucu subklaviyan çalma sendromu olması nedeniyle, 7 hastada da tip III aort diseksiyonu ve anevrizması sebebiyle torasik endovasküler stent greftleme prosedüründe sol subklaviyan arterin kapatılması gereksinimi sebebiyle karotis-subklaviyan baypas ameliyatı yaptık. Hastaların 2si kadın (%12,5) ve 14ü erkek (%87,5) idi ve yaşları 55-74 (ortalama 66,3) yıl arasında değişiyordu. Tüm ameliyatlar genel anestezi altında supraklaviküler insizyonla yapıldı. On dört hastada 8 mm Dacron greft, 2 hastada 8 mm politetrafloroetilen greft kullanıldı. Anastomozlar uç-yan şeklinde yapıldı.Bulgular: Tüm hastalarda radial arter nabızları ameliyat sonrası palpabl oldu ve hastaların sol kolda ağrı ve baş dönmesi gibi şikayetleri, ameliyat sonrasında geçti. Erken 30 günlük morbidite oranı 1 hastada görülen seroma ile %6,2 olarak saptandı; ameliyattan 2 hafta sonrasında sol omzunda ağrı ve şişkinlik şikayeti ile başvuran hastada tespit edilen seroma, ultrasonografi eşliğinde perkutan olarak boşaltıldı. Hiçbir hastada perioperatif stroke veya minor serebrovasküler olay gözlenmedi. Erken greft trombozu oranı %6,2 idi; nativ karotis arterinde tortiyozite ve serebral arter anevrizması olan 1 hastada ameliyattan iki gün sonra greft trombozu gelişti. Karotis-subklaviyan baypas prosedürüne bağlı hiç mortalite gözlenmedi. Torasik endovasküler aorta onarımı (TEVAR) yapılacak ve sol subklaviyan arterin kapatılması gereken hastalarda, öncelikle karotis-subklaviyan baypas ile subklaviyan arter revaskülarizasyonu sağlanarak, sonrasında TEVAR prosedürü uygulandı. Sonuç: Karotis-subklaviyan baypas ameliyatının, iyi cerrahi sonuçlar ve teknik olarak kolay uygulanabilirliği sebebiyle güvenli bir cerrahi yaklaşım olduğunu düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAM, H., SAĞLAM, F., BİLGİÇ, A., ERÇELİK, Ü., ŞENER, E., ÇETİN, L., GÜMÜŞ, T., KUNT, A., CANYİĞİT, M., HIDIROĞLU, M., KÜÇÜKER, A. (2022). Karotis-Subklaviyan baypas klinik sonuçlarımız. Damar Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 285–291. https://ajindex.com/articles/649634

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Cherry KJ Jr. Arteriosclerotic occlusive disea- se of brachiocephalic arteries. In: Rutherford RB, ed. Vascular Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphi- a: W.B. Saunders Co.; 2000. p. 1140-62.
  2. AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Jennings TG. Carotid-subclavian bypass grafting with poly- tetrafluo roethyle ne grafts for symptomatic sub- clavian artery stenosis or occlusion:A 20-year experience. J Vasc Surg 2000;32(3):411-8. Contorni L. [The ver tebra-vertebral collateral circulation in obliteration of the subclavian ar- tery at its origin.] Minerva Chir 1960;15:268-71.
  3. Searls DE, Pazde ra L, Korbel E, Vysa ta O, Caplan LR. Symptoms and signs of posterior circulation ischemia in the new England med- ical center posterior circulation registry. Arch Neurol 2012;69(3):346-51.
  4. Aiello F, Morrisey NJ. Open and endovascular management of subclavian and innominate ar- terial pathology. Semin Vasc Surg 2011;24(1):31-5.
  5. Osiro S, Zu rada A, Gie lecki J, Shoja MM, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. A review of subclavian steal syndrome with ccorrelation. Med Sci Mo- nit 2012;18(5):RA57-63. Palchik E, Bakken AM, Wolford HY, Sa ad WE, Davies MG. Subclavian artery revascularizati- on:an outcome analyis based on mode of the- raphy and pre senting symptoms. Ann Vasc Surg 2008;22(1):70-8.
  6. Brountzos EN, Petersen B, Binkert C, Pana- giotou I, Kaufman JA. Primary stenting of sub- clavian and innominate artery occlusive disease:a single center’s experience. Cardio- vasc Intervent Radiol 2004;27(6):616-23.
  7. Khalil A, Nashef SAM. An alternative surgical approach to subclavian and innomina te ste- nosis: a case series. J Car diothorac Surg 2010;5:73. Labropo ulos N, Nan di vada P, Bekelis K. Prevalan ce and im pact of the subc la vian steal syndro me. Ann Surg 2010;252(1):166- 70. DeBakey ME, Morris GC, Jordon GL, Cooley DA. Segmental thrombo-obliterative disease of branches of aortic arch. J Am Med Assoc 1958;166(9):998-1003.
  8. Dietrich IB, Garrett HE, Ameriso J, Crawford ES, El-Bayar M, DeBakey ME. Occlusive dis- e ase of the common carotid and subclavian arteries treated by carotid-subclavian bypass. Am J Surg 1967;114(5):800-8. Bachman DM,Kim RM.Transluminal dila tation for subclavian steal syndrome. AJR Am J Ro - entgenol 1980;135(5):995-6.
  9. Ziomek S, Qui nones-Bal drich WJ, Busut til RW, Baker JD, Machleder HI, Moore WS. The superiority of synthetic arterial grafts over au- togenous veins in carotid-subclavian bypass. J Vasc Surg 1986;3(1):140-5.
  10. Law MM, Colburn MD, Moore WS, Quiñones- Baldrich WJ, Machleder HI, Gel