Journals / Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

THE IMPACTS OF SOCIAL SUPPORT TYPES AND SOURCES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP

Sosyal Destek Türlerinin ve Kaynaklarinin Psikolojik Sahiplenme Üzerindeki Etkileri

Pages
11–23
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Given the importance of psychological ownership for businesses, the findings of this study have significant contributions and suggestions for further empirical studies, in addition to its practical value on managers and employees.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this paper is to understand the impact of types and sources of social support on psychological ownership and to attempt to extend the empirical evidence on the predictors of psychological ownership of employees.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Drawing on the data of 277 employees, variables’ factorial structures were tested using confirmatory factor analysis and hypotheses were tested with hierarchical regression analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Given the importance of psychological ownership for businesses, the findings of this study have significant contributions and suggestions for further empirical studies, in addition to its practical value on managers and employees.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to understand the impact of types and sources of social support on psychological ownership and to attempt to extend the empirical evidence on the predictors of psychological ownership of employees. This study draws on data from employees working in private sector in Turkey. A quantitative research method was used. Drawing on the data of 277 employees, variables’ factorial structures were tested using confirmatory factor analysis and hypotheses were tested with hierarchical regression analysis. The results reveal that the relationship of psychological ownership and social support varies according to types and sources of social support. Given the importance of psychological ownership for businesses, the findings of this study have significant contributions and suggestions for further empirical studies, in addition to its practical value on managers and employees.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, sosyal destek türlerinin ve kaynaklarının psikolojik sahiplenme üzerindeki etkisini anlamak ve psikolojik sahiplenme öncülleri üzerine yapılmış ampirik araştırmaları geliştirmektir. Çalışma Türkiye’de özel sektörde çalışan bireylerden veri toplanarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Nicel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. 277 çalışandan elde edilen veriler doğrultusunda değişkenlerin faktör yapıları doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, hipotezler ise regresyon analizleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, psikolojik sahiplenme ile sosyal destek arasındaki ilişkinin sosyal desteğin türlerine ve elde edildiği kaynaklara göre değiştiğini göstermiştir. Psikolojik sahiplenmenin işletmeler için önemi göz önüne alındığında, bu çalışma bulguları, yöneticiler ve çalışanlara yönelik pratik değeri yanında, ilerleyen zamanlarda yapılacak ampirik çalışmalar için de önemli katkılara ve önerilere sahiptir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEMERCİ, A. B., ERGENELİ, A. (2022). THE IMPACTS OF SOCIAL SUPPORT TYPES AND SOURCES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 11–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/649466

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ABUALRUB, R. F. (2004). “Job stress, job performance, and social support among hospital nurses”, Journal of nursing scholarship, Vol. 36(1); 73-78.
  2. AKIN, M. (2008). “Örgütsel destek, sosyal destek ve iş/aile çatışmalarının yaşam tatmini üzerindeki etkileri”, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Vol. 25(2), 141-170.
  3. ALDERFER, C. P. (1969). “A new theory of human needs”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol.4, 142-175.
  4. ALP, M. (2007). “Örgütlerde psikolojik sahiplenme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi,
  5. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yükseklisans Tezi. ASATRYAN, V. S., and OH, H. (2008). “Psychological ownership theory: An exploratory application in the restaurant industry”, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, Vol. 32(3), 363-386.
  6. AVEY, J. B., AVOLIO, B. J., CROSSLEY, C. D., and LUTHANS, F. (2009). “Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 30(2), 173-191.
  7. AYCAN, Z., KANUNGO, R., MENDONCA, M., YU, K., DELLER, J., STAHL, G., and KURSHID, A. (2000). “Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10‐country comparison”, Applied Psychology, Vol. 49(1), 192-221.
  8. BEGGAN, J. K. (1992). “On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect”, Journal of Personality and Social psychology, Vol. 62(2), 229-237.
  9. BLAU, PETER M. (1967). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley BRADLEY, J. R., and CARTWRIGHT, S. (2002). “Social support, job stress, health, and job satisfaction among nurses in the United Kingdom”, International Journal of Stress Management, Vol. 9(3), 163-182.
  10. BARUCH-FELDMAN, C., BRONDOLO, E., BEN-DAYAN, D., and SCHWARTZ, J. (2002). “Sources of social support and burnout, job satisfaction, and productivity”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, Vol. 7(1), 84-93.
  11. CAPLAN, R. D. (1979). “Social support, person-environment fit, and coping”, Mental health and the economy, 89-137.
  12. CHEN, X. P., EBERLY, M. B., CHIANG, T. J., FARH, J. L., and CHENG, B. S. (2014). “Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance”, Journal of management, Vol. 40(3), 796-819.
  13. COBB, S. (1976). “Social support as a moderator of life stress”, Psychosomatic medicine, Vol. 38(5), 300-314.
  14. COHEN, S., and WILLS, T. A. (1985). “Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis”. Psychological bulletin, Vol. 98(2), 310. CONNELLY, C. E., ZWEIG, D., WEBSTER, J., and TR