Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2014 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Comparative assessment of resistance to enamel demineralization after orthodontic banding with three different cements- An in vitro study

Pages
159–165
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall comparison showed a statistically significant difference (F=187.97, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This in vitro study aimed to compare the resistance to enamel demineralization after banding with three orthodontic cements, namely Zinc Phosphate, Zinc Polycarboxylateand Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement [RMGI] (Fuji Ortho Band Pak, GC).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: 80 premolars were selected, cleaned, dried and divided into four groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall comparison showed a statistically significant difference (F=187.97, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This in vitro study aimed to compare the resistance to enamel demineralization after banding with three orthodontic cements, namely Zinc Phosphate, Zinc Polycarboxylateand Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement [RMGI] (Fuji Ortho Band Pak, GC). Materials and Methods: 80 premolars were selected, cleaned, dried and divided into four groups. Group A was a Control group. Group B, C and D were banded with the stainless steel bands using the respective cements. The teeth were then placed in deionized water for one month. They were debanded, cleaned and placed in artificial demineralizing solution for four weeks. Afterwards, they were cleaned and placed in methylene blue for 24 hours to check the amount of demineralization. The teeth were cut buccolingually and observed under the Motic Image Digital microscope. For analysis, the depth of dye penetration was measured in µm, which was considered as the depth of sub superficial demineralization. Results: RMGI cement showed significantly lower amount of demineralization (6.68 ±3.02µm) compared to the Zinc Polycarboxylate cement group (18.08± 5.83µm). The Zinc Phosphate cement group(55.36±8.67µm) and the Control group(76.72±18.83µm) demonstrated the greatest depth of enamel demineralization. Overall comparison showed a statistically significant difference (F=187.97, p

🔖

Cite This Article

HEGDE, A. B., NAYAK, K., PATİL, T., KHANDEKAR, S., GRUPTA, G. (2022). Comparative assessment of resistance to enamel demineralization after orthodontic banding with three different cements- An in vitro study. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 159–165. https://ajindex.com/articles/649399

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Gorton J, Featherstone JD. In vivo inhibition of demineralization around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:10–14
  2. Behnan SM, Arruda AO, González- cabezas C, Sohn W, Peters MC. In- vitro evaluation of various treatments to prevent demineralization next to orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:712– 713
  3. Gorelick A, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. White spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982;81:93-98
  4. Mizrahi E. Surface distribution of enamel opacities following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1983;84:323-331. 5. Øgaard B, Rølla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 94:68-73
  5. Benson PE, Millet DT, Dyer F, Parkin N, Vine RS. -Flourides, Orthodontics and Demineralization; a systematic review. J Orthod 2005;32:102-114
  6. Vorhies AB, Donly KJ, Staley RN, Wefel JS. Enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets bonded with hybrid glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:668-674
  7. Donly KJ, Istre S, Istre T. In vitro enamel remineralization at orthodontic band margins cemented with glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:461-464
  8. Shannon IL. Comparison of orthodontic cements containing sodium fluoride or stannous fluoride. Am J Orthod1980; 78:640-645
  9. Foley T, Aggarwal M, Hatibovic- Kofman S. A comparison of in vitro enamel demineralization potential of 3 orthodontic cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:526– 530
  10. Alexander SA, Ripa LW. Effects of self-applied topical Fluoride preparations in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 2000;70:424–430
  11. Uysal T, Amasyali M, Koyuturk AE, Sagdic D. Efficiency of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite and resin modified glass ionomer on demineralization evaluated by a new laser fluorescence device. Eur J Dent 2009;3:127–134. 13. de Moura MS, de Melo Simplicio AH, Cury JA. In-vivo effects of fluoridated antiplaque dentifrice and bonding material on enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:357– 363
  12. HamulaW, Hamula DW, Brower K. Glass lonomer Update. J Clin Orthod 1993;27:420-425
  13. Norris DS, Mclnnes-Ledoux P, Schwaninger B, Weinberg R. Retention of orthodontic bands with new fluoride-releasing cements. Am J Orthod 1986;89:206-211
  14. Rezk-Lega F, Ogaard B, Arends J. An