SavedAdd your journal

Journals / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

The Effects of Lidocaine, Fentanyl, and Remifentanil on Hemodynamics and Intraocular Eye Pressure After Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Ali Caner SAYAR
Özlem DELİGÖZ
Ferhunde Dilek SUBAŞI
Serhat İMAMOĞLU
Osman EKİNCİ
Pages
77–82
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: From the results of this study, it was concluded that remifentanil and fentanyl were more effective drugs than lidocaine in the prevention of increased IOP and hemodynamic response to intubation, and there was no significant difference between these two drugs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: An increased reflex in sympathetic and sympathoadrenal activity caused by tracheal intubation causes an increase in arterial blood pressure, and increased venous pressure causes an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The patients were separated into 3 groups (lidocaine, fentanyl, and remifentanil).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: From the results of this study, it was concluded that remifentanil and fentanyl were more effective drugs than lidocaine in the prevention of increased IOP and hemodynamic response to intubation, and there was no significant difference between these two drugs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: An increased reflex in sympathetic and sympathoadrenal activity caused by tracheal intubation causes an increase in arterial blood pressure, and increased venous pressure causes an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP). The aim of the current study was to compare the effects of lidocaine, fentanyl, and remifentanil to determine which agent was most effective in the prevention of elevated IOP. Methods: The patients were separated into 3 groups (lidocaine, fentanyl, and remifentanil). Heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured and recorded 2 min after the administration of the drugs and at 1, 5, and 10 min after intubation. IOP was measured and recorded in each eye separately by an ophthalmologist preoperatively, at 2 min after drug administration and at 1, 5, and 10 min after intubation. Results: MAP was found to be high (122.750±17.068) in the lidocaine group at 1 min after intubation. In all 3 groups, the right and left eye IOP values were found to be higher at 1 min after intubation than at 2 min after drug administration. Only the difference in the lidocaine group was statistically significant (p=0.003). In all 3 groups, the right and left eye IOP values at 5 min after intubation were statistically significantly lower than the values at 1 min after intubation (Group 1: p=0.001, Group 2: p=0.000, and Group 3: p=0.000). Conclusion: From the results of this study, it was concluded that remifentanil and fentanyl were more effective drugs than lidocaine in the prevention of increased IOP and hemodynamic response to intubation, and there was no significant difference between these two drugs.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYAR, A. C., DELİGÖZ, Ö., SUBAŞI, F. D., İMAMOĞLU, S., EKİNCİ, O. (2022). The Effects of Lidocaine, Fentanyl, and Remifentanil on Hemodynamics and Intraocular Eye Pressure After Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 77–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/649052

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kaplan JD, Schuster DP. Physigolic consequences of tracheal intubation. Clin Chest Med 1991;12:425–32
  2. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, editors. Clinical Anesthesiology. 4th ed. International Edition, Lange Medical Books; 2006. p. 91–116
  3. Murgatroyd H, Bembridge J. Continuing Education in Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 100–3
  4. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: Baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:714–20
  5. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: A randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:701–13
  6. Lee LA. Postoperative visual loss data gathered and analyzed. ASA Newslett 2000;64:25–7
  7. Vachon CA, Warner DO, Bacon DR. Succinylcholine and the open globe: Tracing the teaching. Anesthesiology 2003;99:220– 3
  8. Kayhan Z. Endotrakeal Entübasyon, Klinik Anestezi Genişletilmiş. 3rd ed. İstanbul: Logos Yayıncılık; 2004. p. 243–306
  9. Donlon JV, Doyle DJ, Feldman MA. Anesthesia for Eye, Ear, Nose and Throatsurgery: Miller’s Anesthesia. 6th ed. Philedelphia, PA: Elsevier Churcill Livingstone; 2005. p. 2527–50
  10. Sator-Katzenschlager SM, Oehmke MJ, Deusch E, Dolezal S, Heinze G, Wedrich A. Effects of remifentanil and fentanyl on intraocular pressure during the maintenance and recovery of anaesthesia in patients undergoing non-ophtalmic surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004;21:95–100
  11. Memiş D, Alpaydın T, Pamukçu Z and Turan N. Laringoskopi ve trakeal entübasyonla gelişen kardiyovasküler yanıtların önlenmesinde esmolol, alfentanil, fentanil ve lidokainin karşılaştırılması. Türk Anest Rean Cem Mecm 1999;27:513–6
  12. Helfman SM, Gold MI, DeLisser EA and Herrington CA. Which drug prevents tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal ıntubation: Lidocaine, fentanyl, or esmolol anesth. Anesth Analg 1991;72:482–659
  13. O’Hare R, McAtamney D, Mirakhur RK, Hughes D, Carabine U. Bolus dose remifentanil for control of haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:283–5
  14. Iannuzzi E, Iannuzzi M, Cirillo V, Viola G, Parisi R, Cerulli A, et al. Periintubation cardiovasculer response d