SavedAdd your journal

Journals / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Clinical and Topographic Outcomes of Hybrid and Scleral Lenses in Advanced Keratoconus

Betul Ilkay SEZGİN AKÇAY
Alev KOÇKAR
Utku LİMON
Esra KARDEŞ
Aslihan DOĞAN DURSUN
Pages
59–65
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Mean BCVA (log MAR) improved significantly from 0.65±0.27 to 0.14±0.09 with HCL and 0.58±0.25 to 0.15±0.13 with MSCL (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To evaluate and compare the effects of hybrid contact lenses (HCLs) and mini-scleral contact lenses (MSCLs) on visual acuity, spherical equivalent, topographic astigmatism, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in eyes with advanced keratoconus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 43 eyes of 27 patients diagnosed with advanced keratoconus fit hybrid contact lenses (AirFlex®) and mini-scleral contact lenses (Mini-misa®).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Mean BCVA (log MAR) improved significantly from 0.65±0.27 to 0.14±0.09 with HCL and 0.58±0.25 to 0.15±0.13 with MSCL (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the effects of hybrid contact lenses (HCLs) and mini-scleral contact lenses (MSCLs) on visual acuity, spherical equivalent, topographic astigmatism, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in eyes with advanced keratoconus. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 43 eyes of 27 patients diagnosed with advanced keratoconus fit hybrid contact lenses (AirFlex®) and mini-scleral contact lenses (Mini-misa®). Pre-fitting examinations included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent, topographic findings (topographic astigmatism, maximum keratometry, mean keratometry, central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, and corneal HOAs. Post-fitting examinations included lens corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, topographic astigmatism, corneal HOAs, and contact lens-related discomfort symptoms. Results: Mean BCVA (log MAR) improved significantly from 0.65±0.27 to 0.14±0.09 with HCL and 0.58±0.25 to 0.15±0.13 with MSCL (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇAY, B. I. S., KOÇKAR, A., LİMON, U., KARDEŞ, E., DURSUN, A. D. (2022). Comparison of Clinical and Topographic Outcomes of Hybrid and Scleral Lenses in Advanced Keratoconus. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 59–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/649042

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998;42:297– 319
  2. Kennedy RH, Bourne WM, Dyer JA. A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 1986;101:267–73
  3. McGhee CN, Kim BZ, Wilson PJ. Contemporary treatment paradigms in keratoconus. Cornea 2015;34:16–23
  4. Downie LE, Lindsay RG. Contact lens management of keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom 2015;98:299–311
  5. Gemoules G, Morris KM. Rigid gas-permeable contact lenses and severe higher order aberrations in postsurgical corneas. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:304–7
  6. Barr JT, Wilson BS, Gordon MO, Rah MJ, Riley C, Kollbaum PS, et al., Estimation of the incidence and factors predictive of corneal scarring in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Cornea 2006;25:16–25
  7. Rico-Del-Viejo L, Garcia-Montero M, Hernandez-Verdejo JL, García-Lázaro S, Gómez-Sanz FJ, Lorente-Velázquez A. Nonsurgical procedures for keratoconus management. J Ophthalmol 2017;2017:9707650
  8. Hashemi H, Shaygan N, Asgari S, Rezvan F, Asgari S. ClearKone- Synergeyes or rigid gas-permeable contact lens in keratoconic patients: a clinical decision. Eye Contact Lens 2014;40:95–8
  9. Abdalla YF, Elsahn AF, Hammersmith KM, Cohen EJ. Synergeyes lenses for keratoconus. Cornea 2010;29:5–8
  10. Kim S, Lee JS, Park YK, Lee SU, Park YM, Lee JH, et al. Fitting miniscleral contact lenses in korean patients with keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom 2017;100:375–9
  11. Colak HN, Kantarci FA, Yildirim A, Tatar MG, Goker H, Uslu H, et al. Comparison of corneal topographic measurements and high order aberrations in keratoconus and normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2016;39:380–4
  12. Bilgin LK, Yilmaz S, Araz B, Yüksel SB, Sezen T. 30 years of contact lens prescribing for keratoconic patients in Turkey. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009;32:16–21
  13. Pullum KW, Whiting MA, Buckley RJ. Scleral contact lenses: the expanding role. Cornea 2005;24:269–77
  14. Gomes JAP, Rapuano CJ, Belin MW, Belin MW, Ambrósio R, Guell JL, et al. Global consensus on keratoconus diagnosis. Cornea 2015;34:38–9
  15. Barnett M, Mannis MJ. Contact lenses in the management of keratoconus. Cornea 2011;30:1510–6
  16. Kazanci B, Ozek D, Anayol A, Balikçi A, Ileri D, Yilmazbaş P. Applications of different types of gas-permeable contact lenses in keratoconus and their visual results. Eur J Ophthalmol 2014;24:835–41
  17. Kumar M, Shetty R, Dutta D, Rao HL, Jayadev C, Atchison DA. Effects of a semi-scleral contact lens on refraction and higher