SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2

OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE, EXECUTIVE STRUCTURE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

SAHİPLİK YAPISI, YÖNETİM YAPISI VE FİRMA PERFORMANSI: TÜRKİYE’DEN BULGULAR

İhsan YİĞİT
Pages
349–364
Publication Date
2015-03-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The data from businesses listed in Borsa Istanbul was used to understand the relation between corporate governance and organizational performance

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the relationship between corporate governance and company performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:I consider two measures of corporate governance during the period 2005–2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The data from businesses listed in Borsa Istanbul was used to understand the relation between corporate governance and organizational performance
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005–2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sahiplik Yapısı · Yönetim Yapısı · Vekalet Teorisi

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between corporate governance and company performance. I consider two measures of corporate governance during the period 2005–2011. Financial ratio, Return on Sales (ROS) was applied to measure organizational performance. A significant positive relationship between ownership structure and organizational performance and between executive structure and organizational performance was found. The data from businesses listed in Borsa Istanbul was used to understand the relation between corporate governance and organizational performance

Özet

Bu çalışma şirket yönetişimi ve örgütsel performans arasındaki ilişkiyi anlamayı amaçlamaktadır. 2005-2005 yılları arasını kapsayan bu araştırmada şirket yönetişimi için iki ölçü düşünülmüştür. Örgütsel performans ölçütü olarak ROA ve ROS değerleri kullanılmıştır. Sahiplik yapısı ile örgütsel performans arasında istatistiki olarak anlamlı pozitif yönlü korelasyon tespit edilmiştir. Diğer taraftan yönetim yapısı ile örgütsel performans arasında istatistiki olarak anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmiştir. Araştırmada Borsa İstanbul verileri kullanılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YİĞİT, İ. (2015). OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE, EXECUTIVE STRUCTURE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2, 349–364. https://ajindex.com/articles/6489

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. AGRAWAL, A., and KNOEBER C.R., “Firm Performance And Mechanisms To Control Agency Problems Between Managers And Shareholders”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.31, No.3, (1996), pp. 377-397.
  2. AMIHUD, Y., and LEV, B., “Does Corporate Ownershıp Structure Affect Its Strategy Towards Diversificatıon?”, Strategic Management Journal 20, 1999, pp.1063-1069.
  3. ARSLAN, O., KARAN, M.B., and EKSİ, C., “Board structure and corporate performance”, Managing Global Transitions, Vol:8. No.1, 2010, pp.3-22. BARCA F., and BECHT, M., The Control of Corporate Europe, Londra: Oxford Basim, 2001.
  4. BEKTAS, E., and KAYMAK T., “Governance Mechanisms and Ownership in an Emerging Market: The Case of Turkish Banks”, Emerging Markets Finance & Trade Vol. 45, No. 6, 2009, pp. 20–32. BERLE A., and GARDENER M., The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York;Harcourt, Brace, & World, 1932.
  5. BHAGAT, S., and BOLTON, B., “Director ownership, governance, and performance”, Journal Of Financial And Quantitative Analysis, Vol:48, No.1, 2013, pp. 105–135.
  6. BONGJIN, K., PRESCOTT, J.E., and KIM, S.M., “Differentiated Governance Of Foreign Subsidiariesin Transnational Corporations: An Agency Theory Perspective”, Journal Of International Management 11, 2005, pp. 43- 66. COHEN A., and BARUCH Y., “An Agency Theory Perspective Of The Israeli Labor Market Segmentation: Past, Present, And Future”, Human Resource Management Review 20, 2010, pp.186-193.
  7. CONSTANTINOS, M.C. and WILLIAMSON, P.J., “Related Diversification, Core Competences and Corporate Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 1994, pp.149-65.
  8. ÇITAK, L., “The Impact of Ownership Structure on Company Performance; A Panel Data Analysis on Istanbul Stock Exchange Listed (ISE-100) Companies”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Vol.9, 2007, pp. 231-245. DEMSETZ H., and BELEN, V., “Ownership Structure And Corporate Performance”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, 2001, pp.209–233. DEMSETZ H., and KENNETH L., “The Structure Of Corporate Ownership: Causes And Consequences”, Journal Of Political Economy, Vol.93, No. 6, 1985, pp.1155-1177.
  9. DENIS D.J., DENIS D.K., and SARIN, A., “Agency Theory And The Influence Of Equity Ownership Structure On Corporate Diversification Strategies”, Strategic Management Journal 20, 1999, pp.1071-1076.
  10. DICKINS, D., and HOUMES, R., “Revisiting the Relationship Between Insider Ownership and Performance”, Journal of Business & Economic Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2009, pp.32-43. DONA