Journals / Arkeoloji ve Sanat / 2022 / Cilt: - Sayı: 170

TWO TERRACOTTA HORSE FIGURINES FROM PERGE

Perge’den Terrakotta İki At Figürini

Pages
95–112
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Two coroplastic horse figurines from the Roman Imperial Period, can be dated to the 2nd-3rd century AD.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:During the 2015 excavations in Perge, two terracotta horse figurines were found on the west street.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is understood that the coroplastic horse figurine with inventory number 2015/157 was used as a votive statuette since it was located in the Mosaic Building, which was located on the south side of the west street and served as a sanctuary during the Roman Period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Two coroplastic horse figurines from the Roman Imperial Period, can be dated to the 2nd-3rd century AD.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

During the 2015 excavations in Perge, two terracotta horse figurines were found on the west street. In ancient times, these types of figurines were used as votive offerings, grave gifts or toys. It is understood that the coroplastic horse figurine with inventory number 2015/157 was used as a votive statuette since it was located in the Mosaic Building, which was located on the south side of the west street and served as a sanctuary during the Roman Period. The terracotta horse figurine with inventory number 2015/158 was found at the west end of this street. Although it is more likely to be a toy, its function has not been determined exactly. Two coroplastic horse figurines from the Roman Imperial Period, can be dated to the 2nd-3rd century AD.

Özet

Perge 2015 yılı kazılarında batı cadde üzerinde iki adet terrakotta at figürini bulunmuştur. Antik Çağ'da bu tip heykelcikler adak, mezar armağanı ya da oyuncak olarak kullanılmışlardır. Batı cad denin güney tarafında yer alan ve Roma Dönemi’nde kutsal alan işlevli Mozaikli Yapı’da bulunması nedeniyle 2015/157 envanter numaralı koroplastik at figürininin adak heykelciği olarak kullanıldığı anlaşılmaktadır. 2015/158 envanter numaralı pişmiş toprak at figürin ise bu caddenin batı uç kıs mında bulunmuştur. Oyuncak olması daha muhtemel olmakla beraber hangi işlevle kullanıldığı tam tespit edilememiştir. Roma İmparatorluk Dönemi’ne ait koroplastik iki at figürini MS 2-3. yüzyıllara tarihlenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, A., ÇETİNTAŞ, E. (2022). TWO TERRACOTTA HORSE FIGURINES FROM PERGE. Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Cilt: - Sayı: 170, 95–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/648701

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Albenda, P. 2004. “Horses of Different Breeds: Observations in Assyrian Art”. C. Nicolle (yay.) Amurru 3. Nomades et sédentaries dans le Proche-Orient ancien. Compte rendu de la XLVIe recontre Assyriologique internationale (Paris, 10-13 Julliet 2000): 321-334. Éditions Recherche sur le Civilisations, Paris. Almagor, E. 2021. “The Horse and the Lion in Achaemenid Persia: Representations of a Duality”. Arts 10 (41): 1-33.
  2. Alpdoğan Kasar, Ö. 2010. Pedasa Buluntusu Pişmiş Toprak Figürinler. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Muğla Üniversitesi,
  3. Muğla. Akın, Y. 2012. İS. III.-V. Yüzyıllarda Pamphylia Kentlerindeki Toplumsal Değişimler. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi,
  4. Antalya. Akurgal, E. 1997. Anadolu Kültür Tarihi. Türkiye Bilimler ve Teknik Araştırma Kurumu (TÜBİTAK) Yayını, Ankara.
  5. Averett, E. W. 2007. Dedications in Clay: Terracotta Figurines in Early Iron Age Greece (c. 1100-700 BCE). PhD Thesis. University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia. Banou, E. S. ve Bournias, L. K. 2014. Kerameikos. John S. Latis Public Benefit Foundation, Athens. Baskıcı, M. 1998. “Evcilleştirme Tarihine Kısa Bir Bakış”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 53 (1): 73-94.
  6. Bennett, E. A., Weber, J., Bendhafer, W., Champlot, S., Peters, J., Schwartz, G. M., Grange, T. ve Geigl, E. M. 2022. “The Genetic Identitiy of the Earliest Human-Made Hybrid Animals, the Kungas of Syro-Mesopotamia”, Science Advances 8: 1-10. Bernáldez-Sánchez, E. ve García-Viňas, E. 2019. “The Equids Represented in Cave Art and Current Horses: A Proposal to Determine Morphological Differences and Similarities”, Anthropozoologica 54 (1): 1-12. Bradač, M. M. 2003. “Greek Mythological Horses and the World’s Boundary”, Opvsc. archaeol. 27: 379-391.
  7. Busbey, D. ve Rutland, C. 2019. The Horse: A Natural History. Princeton University Press,
  8. Princeton. Canay, A. 2000.Antik Çağ Koroplastik Sanatı ve Bu Sanatın Etkileriyle Ortaya Çıkan Günümüz Seramik Örnekleri. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi,
  9. Eskişehir. Canay, A. 2002. “Antik Tanrılara Mutluluk Veren Terrakotalar/Terrakota Adaklar”, Anadolu Sanat 12: 39-48.
  10. Chondros, T. G., Milidonis, K. F., Rossi, C. ve Zrnic, N. 2016. “The Evolution of the Double-horse Chariots from the Bronze Age to the Hellenistic Times”. FME Transactions 44: 229-236.
  11. Combier, J. ve Jouve, G. 2012. “Chauvet Cave’s Art is not Aurignacian: A New Examination of the Archaeological Evidence and Dating Procedures”. Quartär 59: 131-152.
  12. Conkey, M. W. 2010. “Images witho