SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 71 - Sayı: 2

"To ask, or not to ask...": In Search of InterestingTheoretical Contribution in the Fieldof Management and Organization Studies and the Role of Research Question

"SORMAK YA DA SORMAMAK": YÖNETİM VE ORGANİZASYON ALANINDA İLGİNÇ KURUMSAL KATKI ARAYIŞI VE ARAŞTIRMA SORUSUNUN ROLÜ

Ozan AĞLARGÖZ
Pages
511–535
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Embarking from the dilemma caused by gap-spotting -traditional research question development approach- problematization which is said to be more innovative, is offered as an alternative way for developing research questions for providing interesting theoretical contribution

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this paper is to underscore the potential importance of research question for providing interesting theoretical contribution and confer guidance on how research questions having that potential can be developed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Recent studies agreed upon the fact that prevalent methods used for developing research questions are failing to provide interesting theoretical contribution and called for the need on more innovative approaches.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Embarking from the dilemma caused by gap-spotting -traditional research question development approach- problematization which is said to be more innovative, is offered as an alternative way for developing research questions for providing interesting theoretical contribution
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to underscore the potential importance of research question for providing interesting theoretical contribution and confer guidance on how research questions having that potential can be developed. Recent studies agreed upon the fact that prevalent methods used for developing research questions are failing to provide interesting theoretical contribution and called for the need on more innovative approaches. Embarking from the dilemma caused by gap-spotting -traditional research question development approach- problematization which is said to be more innovative, is offered as an alternative way for developing research questions for providing interesting theoretical contribution

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı ilginç kuramsal katkı sağlama potansiyeli açısından araştırma sorusunun önemini vurgulamak ve bu potansiyele sahip araştırma sorularının nasıl geliştirilebileceğine ilişkin kavramsal düzeyde öneriler sunmaktır. Yürütülen araştırmalar alanyazına dayalı olarak araştırma sorusu geliştirme girişimlerinde yaygın olarak kullanılan geleneksel yöntemlerin ilginç kuramsal katkı sağlama konusundaki yetersizliği noktasında birleşmekte ve araştırma sorusu geliştirme konusunda daha yenilikçi yaklaşımlara olan ihtiyaca dikkat çekmektedir. Bu çalışma kapsamında araştırma sorusu geliştirme konusunda geleneksel baskın yaklaşım olarak kabul edilen dolgulama yaklaşımının yol açtığı açmazdan hareketle daha yenilikçi olduğu düşünülen sorunsallaştırma yaklaşımı ilginç kuramsal katkı sağlama konusunda alternatif bir yol olarak önerilmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

AĞLARGÖZ, O. (2022). "To ask, or not to ask...": In Search of InterestingTheoretical Contribution in the Fieldof Management and Organization Studies and the Role of Research Question. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 71 - Sayı: 2, 511–535. https://ajindex.com/articles/648637

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Adler, Nancy. J. ve Hans Hansen (2012), "Daring to Care: Scholarship that Supports the Courage of Our Convictions", Journal of Management Inquiry, 21 (2): 128-139.
  2. Adler, Paul. S. ve Seok-Woo Kwon (2002), "Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept", Academy of Management Review, 27 (1): 17-40.
  3. Alvesson, Mats (2012), "Do We Have Something to Say? From Re-search to Roi-search and Back Again", Organization, 20 (1): 79-90.
  4. Alvesson, Mats ve Yiannis Gabriel (2013), "Beyond Formulaic Research: In Praise of Greater Diversity in Organizational Research and Publications", Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12 (2): 245-263.
  5. Alvesson, Mats ve Jörgen Sandberg (2013), Constructing Research Questions: Doing Interesting Research (London: Sage). Alvesson, Mats ve Jörgen Sandberg (2014), "Habitat and Habitus: Boxed-in versus Box-Breaking Research", Organization Studies, 35 (7): 967-987.
  6. Bacharach, Samuel B. (1989), "Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation", Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 496-515.
  7. Balaban, Utku (2014), "Commentary on Secrets of Economics Editors: An Unintended Ethnography of Economics", The Journal of Philosophical Economics, 8 (1): 1-13.
  8. Barley, Stephen R. (2006), "When I Write My Masterpiece: Thoughts on What Makes a Paper Interesting", Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1): 16-20.
  9. Bartunek, Jean M, Sara L. Rynes ve R. Duane Ireland (2006), "What Makes Management Research Interesting, and Why Does It Matter?", Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1): 9-15.
  10. Bedeian, Arthur G. (1996), "Improving the Journal Review Process: The Question of Ghostwriting", American Psychologist, 51 (11): 1189-1189.
  11. Bedeian, Arthur G. (2003), "The Manuscript Review Process: The Proper Roles of Authors, Referees, and Editors", Journal of Management Inquiry, 12 (4): 331-338.
  12. Bedeian, Arthur G. (2004), "The Gift of Professional Maturity", Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3 (1): 92-98.
  13. Bem, Daryl (1995), "Writing a Review Article for Psychological Bulletin", Psychological Bulletin, 1 (2): 172-177.
  14. Benner, Mary J. ve Michael L. Tushman (2003), "Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited", Academy of Management Review, 28 (2): 238-256.
  15. Berkman, Ümit. (1987), "Amme İdaresi Dergisi"nde Yayınlanan Makaleler ve Türk Yönetim Bilimi", Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 4 (20): 19-42.
  16. Bryman, Alan (2008), Social Research Methods, 3rd Edition, (New York: Oxford University Press). Campanario, Miguel (1993), "Consolation fo