Journals / Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

Effect of Treatment Modality on Mobility and Quality of Life in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures

İnstabil İntertrokanterik Kırıklarda Tedavi Yönteminin Mobilite ve Yaşam Kalitesine Etkisi

Pages
537–542
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Group 1 had a statistically significantly higher Palmer-Parker mobility and Barthel Index score than Group 2 and Group 3 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate mobility and quality of life in patients who underwent osteosynthesis with proximal femoral nail (PFN), or arthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Treatment outcomes of 117 patients (76 Female/41 Male) who were treated with PFN (Group 1, n=66), hemiarthroplasty (Group 2, n=42), or total hip arthroplasty (Group 3, n=9) between 2008 and 2014 were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Group 1 had a statistically significantly higher Palmer-Parker mobility and Barthel Index score than Group 2 and Group 3 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate mobility and quality of life in patients who underwent osteosynthesis with proximal femoral nail (PFN), or arthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Methods: Treatment outcomes of 117 patients (76 Female/41 Male) who were treated with PFN (Group 1, n=66), hemiarthroplasty (Group 2, n=42), or total hip arthroplasty (Group 3, n=9) between 2008 and 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. The mobility of the patients was evaluated with the Palmer and Parker mobility score, and the quality of life was evaluated with the Barthel quality of life index. Results: The mean ages in the groups were 83.51 (range, 75-97) years, 84.72 (range, 75-109) years, and 83.37 (range, 75-94) years; respectively. The mean follow-up periods were 23.26 (range, 3-43.9) months, 19.24 (range, 3-38) months, and 20.1 (range, 3-40) months; respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the 3 groups in terms of age and follow-up time (p>0.05). Palmer-Parker mobility scores were 6.23 for Group 1, 3.68 for Group 2, and 4.22 for Group 3. Barthel Indexes were 68.73 for Group 1, 37.75 for Group 2, and 52.77 for Group 3. Group 1 had a statistically significantly higher Palmer-Parker mobility and Barthel Index score than Group 2 and Group 3 (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı instabil intertrokanterik kırıklarda proksimal femur çivisi (PFN) ile osteosentez veya artroplasti tedavilerinin mobilite ve yaşam kalitesini üzerine etkilerini araştırmaktı. Yöntem: 2008-2014 yılları arasında PFN (Grup 1, n=66), hemiartroplasti (Grup 2, n=42) veya total kalça artroplastisi (Grup 3, n=9) ile tedavi edilen 117 hastanın (76 Kadın/41 Erkek) tedavi sonuçları restrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Hastaların mobiliteleri Palmer ve Parker mobilite skoru ile, yaşam kaliteleri Barthel yaşam kalitesi indeksi ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Grup 1, Grup 2 ve Grup 3’te ortalama yaşlar sırasıyla 83.51 (aralık, 75-97) yıl, 84.72 (aralık, 75-109) yıl ve 83.37 (aralık, 75-94) yıl idi. Ortalama takip süreleri sırasıyla 23.26 (aralık, 3-43.9) ay, 19.24 (aralık, 3-38) ay ve 20.1 (aralık, 3-40) ay idi. Her 3 grup arasında yaş ve takip süresi açısından istatistiksel anlamlı fark yoktu (p>0.05). Palmer-Parker mobilite skoru Grup 1 için 6.23, Grup 2 için 3.68 ve Grup 3 için 4.22 idi. Barthel indeksi Grup 1 için 68.73, Grup 2 için 37.75 ve Grup 3 için 52.77 idi. Grup 1, Grup 2 ve Grup 3’e kıyasla istatistiksel olarak anlamlı daha yüksek Palmer-Parker skoru ve Barthel indeksi değerine sahip idi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KARADEMİR, G., BİLGİN, Y., DEMİREL, M., POLAT, G., ERŞEN, A., KIZILKURT, T., BÜGET, M. İ., YAZICIOĞLU, Ö. (2022). Effect of Treatment Modality on Mobility and Quality of Life in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 537–542. https://ajindex.com/articles/648086

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. . B. Abrahamsen, T. Van Staa, R. Ariely, M. Olson, C. Cooper, “Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review”, Osteoporos Int, vol. 10, no.50, pp. 1633-1650, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0920-3 [2]. O. Johnell, J.A. Kanis, "An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures", Osteoporos Int, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1726-1733, 2006. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4 [3]. M. Butler, M.L. Forte, S.B. Joglekar, MF Swiontkowski, RL Kane, “Evidence summary: systematic review of surgical treatments for geriatric hip fractures”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, vol. 93, no.12, pp. 1104-1115, 2011. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00296 [4]. V.L. Tang, R. Sudore, I.S. Cenzer, W.J. Boscardin, A. Smith, C. Ritchie, M. Wallhagen, E. Finlayson, L. Petrillo, K. Covinsky, "Rates of recovery to pre-fracture function in older persons with hip fracture: an observational study", J Gen Intern Med, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 153-158, 2017. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3848-2 [5]. G. Karademir, Y. Bilgin, A. Erşen, G. Polat, M.I. Buget, M. Demirel, H.I. Balcı, "Hip fractures in patients older than 75 years old: Retrospective analysis for prognostic factors", Int J Surg, vol. 24, part. A, pp. 101-104, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.009 [6]. A. Karagiannis, E. Papakitsou, K. Dretakis, A. Galanos, P. Megas, E. Lambiris, G.P. Lyritis, "Mortality rates of patients with a hip fracture in a southwestern district of Greece: ten-year follow-up with reference to the type of fracture", Calcif Tissue Int, vol. 78, no.2, pp. 72-77, 2006. doi: 10.1007/s00223-005-0169-6 [7]. N. Fukui, Y. Watanabe, T. Nakano, T. Sawaguchi, T. Matsushita, "Predictors for ambulatory ability and the change in ADL after hip fracture in patients with different levels of mobility before injury: a 1-year prospective cohort study", J Orthop Trauma, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 163-171, 2012. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821e1261 [8]. K.J. Koval, M.L. Skovron, G.B. Aharonoff, S.E. Meadows, J.D. Zuckerman, "Ambulatory ability after hip fracture. A prospective study in geriatric patients", Clin Orthop Relat Res, vol. 310, no. 1, pp. 150-159, 1995. [9]. E.E. Desteli, Y. İmren, M. Erdoğan, Ö. Aydagün, "Quality of life following treatment of trochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly", Clin Invest Med, vol. 38, no.2, pp. 63-72, 2015. [10]. M.J. Parker, C.R. Palmer, “A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture”, J Bone