Journals / Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OPEN INNOVATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: COMPETITIVE CULTURE AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING AS THE DETERMINANTS OF OPEN INNOVATION

AÇIK İNOVASYON VE FİRMA PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİ: AÇIK İNOVASYONUN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ OLARAK REKABETÇİ KÜLTÜR VE BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMI

Pages
733–751
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research, it was found that competitive culture and open innovation are negatively related, while knowledge sharing and open innovation are positively associated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the effect of competitive culture and knowledge sharing on open innovation and to investigate the relationship between open innovation and firm performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the scope of the research, data were collected from 274 middle and senior level managers working in firms operating in Istanbul and Kocaeli through a questionnaire.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the research, it was found that competitive culture and open innovation are negatively related, while knowledge sharing and open innovation are positively associated.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Rekabetçi Kültür · Bilgi Paylaşımı · Açık İnovasyon

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of competitive culture and knowledge sharing on open innovation and to investigate the relationship between open innovation and firm performance. Within the scope of the research, data were collected from 274 middle and senior level managers working in firms operating in Istanbul and Kocaeli through a questionnaire. According to the results of the research, it was found that competitive culture and open innovation are negatively related, while knowledge sharing and open innovation are positively associated. In addition, it was found that open innovation is positively associated with firm performance. These findings were discussed and suggestions were made to researchers and administrators. Thus, the research results are aimed to provide both theoretical and practical contributions.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, rekabetçi kültür ile bilgi paylaşımının açık inovasyon üzerindeki etkisini incelemek ve açık inovasyonun firma performansı ile ilişkini araştırmaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında, İstanbul ve Kocaeli’nde faaliyet gösteren firmalarda çalışan 274 orta ve üst düzey yöneticiden anket yoluyla veri toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, rekabetçi kültür ile açık inovasyonun negatif ilişkili olduğu, bilgi paylaşımı ile açık inovasyonun ise pozitif ilişkili olduğu saptanmıştır. Ayrıca açık inovasyon ile firma performansının pozitif ilişkili olduğu bulunmuştur. Bu bulgular tartışılmış, araştırmacılara ve yöneticilere öneriler sunulmuştur. Böylece araştırma sonuçlarının hem teorik hem de pratik katkılar sunması hedeflenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İMAMOĞLU, S. Z., TÜRKCAN, H., KILIÇ, A. H. (2022). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OPEN INNOVATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: COMPETITIVE CULTURE AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING AS THE DETERMINANTS OF OPEN INNOVATION. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 733–751. https://ajindex.com/articles/648048

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ahn, J. M., Minshall, T. ve Mortara, L. (2015). Open innovation: A new classification and its impact on firm performance in innovative SMEs. Journal of Innovation Management, 3(2), s.33-54. Aleksić, D., Rangus, K., ve Gomezel, A. S. (2021). Microfoundations of SME open innovation: The role of help, knowledge sharing and hiding. European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print (In press). Asrar-ul-Haq, M., ve Anwar, S. (2016). A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), 1127744. Cavaliere, V., ve Lombardi, S. (2015). Exploring different cultural configurations: How do they affect subsidiaries’ knowledge sharing behaviors? Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), s.141 - 163. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), s.35-41.
  2. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West içinde, Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (s.1-12), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Coras, E. L. ve Tantau, A. D. (2014). Open innovation–the good, the bad, the uncertainties. The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, 14(1 (19)), s.38-47.
  4. Crema, M., Verbano, C. ve Venturini, K. (2014). Linking strategy with open innovation and performance in SMEs. Measuring Business Excellence, 18(2), s.14-27.
  5. Crupi, A., Del Sarto, N., Di Minin, A., Phaal, R. ve Piccaluga, A. (2020). Open innovation environments as knowledge sharing enablers: The case of strategic technology and innovative management consortium. Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 25 No. 5, s. 1263-1286.
  6. De Marco, C. E., Martelli, I. ve Di Minin, A. (2020). European SMEs’ engagement in open innovation when the important thing is to win and not just to participate, what should innovation policy do? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119843. De Oliveira, L. S., Echeveste, M. E. ve Cortimiglia, M. N. (2018). Critical success factors for open innovation implementation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(6), s.1283-1294.
  7. Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), s.619-654.
  8. Ebersberger, B., Bloch, C., Herstad, S. J. ve Van De Velde, E. L. S. (2012). Open innovation practices and their