SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 24

Organizational justice and extra-rol behavior relationship

Örgütsel adalet ve ekstra- rol davranıiları ilişkisi

Senay YÜRÜR
Cengiz MENGENCİ
Pages
1–17
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But results didn t support this thought.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate casual relationship between organizational justice and extra rol ebehavior towards service buyers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Survey was delivered to teachers in Bursa. 835 survey were returned and 607 wereaccepted to use in this study.To analysis data, Structural Equation Modelling was used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But results didn t support this thought.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to investigate casual relationship between organizational justice and extra rol ebehavior towards service buyers. Hypothesis were developed by using social exchange theory andequity theory. Survey was delivered to teachers in Bursa. 835 survey were returned and 607 wereaccepted to use in this study.To analysis data, Structural Equation Modelling was used. And t heresults from this study shows that teachers perception of organizational justice determines the extra -role behavior towards students. On the other hand, it had been thought that pay satisfaction, affectivecommitment to organization and supervisor might have had mediating effect between organizationaljustice and extrarole behavior . But results didn t support this thought.

Özet

Araştırmanın amacı, örgütsel adalet ile hizmet alıcısına yönelik ekstra rol davranışı arasındakiilişkinin analiz edilmesidir. Araştırmanın hipotezleri, sosyal mübadele kuramı ve eşitlik kuramınadayalı olarak geliştirilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleme verilerin analizindekullanılmıştır. Bu amaçla, Bursa İlinde 835 öğretmen üzerinde anket araştırması yapılmıştır. 607anket analiz için uygun görülmüştür. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, araştırma kapsamındakiöğretmenlerin örgütsel adalet algıları, öğrencilerine yönelik ekstra rol davranışlarının önemli birbelirleyicisidir. Ancak örgütsel adalet algısı ile ekstra rol davranışları arasında aracılık rolü oynadığıdüşünülen, örgüte yönelik duygusal bağlılık, yöneticiye yönelik duygusal bağlılık ve ücret tatmininin,bu ilişkide aracılık etkisinin olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Araştırmada elde edilen diğer sonuçlar vebunlara ilişkin değerlendirmelere, sonuç ve değerlendirme bölümünde yer verilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜRÜR, S., MENGENCİ, C. (2022). Organizational justice and extra-rol behavior relationship. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 24, 1–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/647609

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Ambrose, M., Hess, R. L. ve Ganesan, S. (2007). “The Relationship Between Justice and Attitudes: An Examination of Justice Effects on Event and System- Related Attitudes”, Organizational Behavior and Human Desicion Processes, 103: 21 -36. Bateman, T.S., ve Organ, D.W. (1983). “Job Satisfaction and the Good Soldier: The Relationship Between Affect and Employee "Citizenship." Academy of Management Journal, 26: 587 -595. Bayram, N., (2010). “Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş (AMOS Uygulamaları)”, ISBN: 978 -975 - 8606 -89- 4, Ezgi Kitabevi,
  2. Bursa. Becker, T. E., Billings, R. S., Eveleth, D. M., ve Gilbert, N. W. (1996). “Foci and Bases of Commitment: Implications for Performance.” Academy of Management Journal, 39: 464 –482. Bettencourt, L. A., Brown, S. W. (1997). “Contact Employees: Relationships Among Workplace Fairness, Job Satisfaction and Prosocial Service Behaviors, Journal or Retailing”, 73(1): 39 -61. Bettencourt, L. A., Brown, S. W., MacKenzie, S. B. (2005). “Customer -Oriented Boundary- Spanning Behaviors: Test of a Social Exchange Model of Antecedents”, Journal of Retailing, 81: 141 – 157. Blau, P.(1964). “Exchange and power in social life”, New York:Jossey- Bass. Blakely, Gerald. L., Martha. C. Andrews ve Robert. H. Moorman (2005). “The Moderating Effects of Equity Sensivity on the Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(2): 259- 273. B ollen, K. A. (1989). “A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Models. Sociological Methods ve Research”, 17: 303- 316. Byrne, B. M. (2001). “Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming”. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Chen, Z.X., Tsui, A.S. ve Farh, J.L. (2002). “Loyalty to Supervisor Versus Organizational Commitment: Relationships to Employee Performance in China”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75: 339–356. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). “On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of A Measure”, Journal of Applied Psychology. 86(3):386 -400. Colquitt, J., Conlon, E., Wesson, M., Porter, C., ve Ng, K. (2001). “Justice at the Millennium: A Metaanalytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 425 -445. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., ve Rupp, D. E. (2001). “Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and other Denizens of Organizational Justice.” J