Journals / Journal of Organizational Behavior Review / 2022 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Do Managers Treat More Fairly Their Subordinates Who Are Compatible with Themselves?

Yöneticiler Kendileriyle Uyumlu Astlarına Daha mı Adil Davranır?

Pages
112–126
Publication Date
2022-07-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Managers stated that subordinates who managers perceive as person-supervisor fit are treated more fairly in terms of distribution, procedure, interpersonal, and information, according to the present study’s main findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Organizational justice literature, which generally focuses on employee perceptions, has sparked interest in what lies behind managers’ fair or unfair behavior.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An online questionnaire was administered to 542 managers in the public and private sectors in this direction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Managers stated that subordinates who managers perceive as person-supervisor fit are treated more fairly in terms of distribution, procedure, interpersonal, and information, according to the present study’s main findings.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ast-Üst Uyumu · Dağıtım Adaleti · Prosedür Adaleti

Abstract

Organizational justice literature, which generally focuses on employee perceptions, has sparked interest in what lies behind managers’ fair or unfair behavior. As a result, the argument has been made that employees are not passive recipients of organizational justice and that they have control over the treatment they receive as a recipient of organizational justice. In other words, employees can use their personal or professional characteristics to influence managers’ fairness. Thus, “What characteristics of employees lead managers to act more fairly?” the question arises. This study is based on this question, and it aims to learn how managers’ perceptions of person-supervisor fit influence their fair or unjust treatment of their employees. An online questionnaire was administered to 542 managers in the public and private sectors in this direction. Managers stated that subordinates who managers perceive as person-supervisor fit are treated more fairly in terms of distribution, procedure, interpersonal, and information, according to the present study’s main findings.

Özet

Genellikle çalışanların algısına odaklanan örgütsel adalet yazınında yöneticilerin adil ya da adil olmayan davranışlarının arka planında neler olduğu merak uyandırmaya başlamıştır. Çalışanların adalete ilişkin kararlardan pasif olarak etkilenmediğini hatta örgütteki adil ya da adaletsiz davranışları yönlendirebilecekleri tartışılmaktadır. Yani, çalışanlar sahip olduğu kişisel özellikleriyle ya da profesyonel özellikleriyle yöneticilerin adil davranışlarına yön verebilir. Öyleyse “Çalışanların hangi özellikleri yöneticileri daha adil davranmaya yönlendirir?” sorusu gündeme gelmektedir. Bu sorudan yola çıkarak bu çalışmada, yöneticilerin astlarına karşı adil ya da adaletsiz davranışlar sergilemesinde ast-üst uyumu (person-supervisor fit) algılarının nasıl bir etkisi olduğunu anlamak amaçlanmıştır. Bu doğrultuda, kamu kurumlarında ve özel sektörde çalışan 542 yöneticiye çevrim içi anket uygulanmıştır. Araştırmanın öne çıkan bulgularına göre; yöneticiler ast-üst uyumu algıladıkları astlarının dağıtım, prosedür, kişilerarası ve bilgilendirme açışından daha adil muamele gördüklerini ifade etmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZICI, N., YÜRÜR, S. (2022). Do Managers Treat More Fairly Their Subordinates Who Are Compatible with Themselves?. Journal of Organizational Behavior Review, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 112–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/778218

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akbaş, T. T. (2011). Algılanan kişi-örgüt uyumunun örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları üzerindeki etkisi: Görgül bir araştırma. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 55-81.
  2. Astakhova, M. N. (2016). Explaining the effects of perceived person-supervisor fit and person-organization fit on organizational commitment in the US and Japan. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 956-963.
  3. Beugre, C. D. (1998). Managing fairness in organizations. Greenwood Publishing Group. Cable M. D. & Judge, T. A. (1994). Pay-preferences and job search decisions: A person-organization fit perspective. Personel Psychology, 47, 317-349. Cable M. D. & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294-311.
  4. Cable, D. M. & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875-884.
  5. Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of management Review, 14(3), 333-349.
  6. Cohen-Charash, Y. & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278-321.
  7. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400.
  8. Cornelis, I., Van Hiel, A. & De Cremer, D. (2012). The effect of followers’ belongingness needs on leaders’ procedural fairness enactment: Mediation through interpersonal and team, Attraction. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11(1), 31-39.
  9. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M. & Kessler, I. (2002). Exploring reciprocity through the lens of the psychological contract: Employee and employer perspectives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(1), 69-86.
  10. Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E. & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34-48.
  11. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R. & Rupp, D. E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(2), 164-209.
  12. Demirtaş, H. A. (2003). Sosyal kimlik kuramı, temel kavram ve varsayımlar. İletişim Araştırmaları, 1(1), 123-144.
  13. Edwards, J. R., Caplan, R. D. & Harrison, R. V. (1998). Person-environment fit theory: Conceptual foundations, empirical evidence,