SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

GEÇİŞ EKONOMİL ERİNDE DYSY'NİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ : PANEL VERİANALİZİ

THE DETERMINANTS OF FDI IN TRANSITION ECONOMIES A PANEL DATA ANALYSIS

Halit YANIKKAYA
Ömer Selçuk EMSEN
Mustafa Kemal DEĞER
Burhan KABADAYI
Cevat GERNİ
Pages
101–120
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our findings thus support the hypothesis that FDI inflows to transition countries can be explained by both market seeking and resource-seeking motivations

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the determinants of foreign direct investments (FDI) in transition economies in the period of 1993-2012 by using panel data analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our estimation results reveal that countries, which have large local markets and macroeconomic stabilization are more successful in attracting the FDI.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our findings thus support the hypothesis that FDI inflows to transition countries can be explained by both market seeking and resource-seeking motivations
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of foreign direct investments (FDI) in transition economies in the period of 1993-2012 by using panel data analysis. Our estimation results reveal that countries, which have large local markets and macroeconomic stabilization are more successful in attracting the FDI. Our findings thus support the hypothesis that FDI inflows to transition countries can be explained by both market seeking and resource-seeking motivations

Özet

Bu çalışmada geçiş ekonomilerine yönelik doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının (DYSY) belirleyicileri 1993-2012 dönemleri arasında panel veri analizleri yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular geniş yerel piyasalara ve makro ekonomik istikrara sahip ülkelerin DYSY'leri kendi ülkelerine çekme konusunda daha başarılı olduklarını göstermektedir. Çalışmamızın bulguları sonuç olarak Geçiş Ekonomilerine yönelik DYSY'lerin piyasaya ve doğal kaynağa yönelimli olduğu hipotezini desteklemektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

YANIKKAYA, H., EMSEN, Ö. S., DEĞER, M. K., KABADAYI, B., GERNİ, C. (2022). GEÇİŞ EKONOMİL ERİNDE DYSY'NİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ : PANEL VERİANALİZİ. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 101–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/647571

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aarle, B. v. and Skuratowicz, A. (2000).,,Trade and FDI flows between the EU and Central and Eastern Europe: Possible effects of EU enlargement", June 2000. Available at: http://www.wiwi.uni-bielefeld.de/~cem/worksh/acefdi.pdf.
  2. Altomonte, C. and Guagliano, C. (2000).,,Competing locations? Market potential and FDI in Central and Eastern Europe vs the Mediterranean", Available at: http://www.econ.kuleuven.ac.be/licos/DP/Dp2001/DP1082001Altomonte.pdf
  3. Bajo-Rubio, O., Sosvillo-Rivero, S., (1994).,,An econometric analysis of foreign direct investment in Spain, 1964-89", Southern Economic Journal, 61, pp. 104-20.
  4. Baltagi, B. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 3e, Chichester, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Banga, R. (2003).,,Impact of government policies and investment agreements on FDI inflows", Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, Working Paper No. 116. http://www.icrier.org/pdf/WP116.PDF
  5. Bellak, C. and Leibrecht, M. (2005).,,Effective tax rates as a determinant of foreign direct investment in Central and East European countries: A panel analysis", Discussion Papers SFB International Tax Coordination, No. 7, Wien, Wirtschaftsuniv, Available at: http://epub.wu wien.ac.at/dyn/virlib/wp/mediate/epub-wu-01_882.pdf?ID=epub-wu-01_882. Bénassy-Quéré, A., Fontagné, L., and Lahrèche-Révil A. (2001).,,Exchange-rate strategies in the competition for attracting foreign direct investment", Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 15 (2), pp. 178-198. Available at: http://team.univ paris1.fr/teamperso/fontagne/papers/jjie.PDF. Billington, N. (1999).,,The location of foreign direct investment: an empirical analysis", Applied Economics, 31, pp. 65-76.
  6. Blonigen, B.A. and Feenstra, R.C. (1996).,,Effect of U.S. trade protection and promotion policies", National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No 5285. Bos, J. and van de Laar, M. (2004).,,Explaining foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe: an extended gravity approach", DNB Working Paper, No. 8. Available at: http://www.dnb.nl/en/binaries/Working%20Paper%20No%208-2004_tcm47-146665.pdf
  7. Boudier-Bensebaa, F. (2005).,,Agglomeration economies and location choice: Foreign direct investment in Hungary", Economics of Transition, 13 (4), pp. 605-28.
  8. Bouoiyour, J. (2003).,,The determining factors of foreign direct investment in Morocco", Available at: http://www.erf.org.eg/tenthconf/Trade_Background/Bouoiyour.pdf.
  9. Brada, J. C., Kutan, A. M. and Yigit, T. M. (2006).