SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Van Tıp Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Epiretinal Membrane Surgery on Youtube

Youtube’da Epiretinal Membran Cerrahisi

Murat Serkan SONGUR
Mehmet ÇITIRIK
Pages
327–331
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Although there are many videos about epiretinal membrane surgery on Youtube, it has been determined that these videos are low usefulness as a source and poor quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In this study, our aim is to evaluate the usefulness of YouTube videos about epiretinal membrane surgery in the retina.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: When it was scanned by typing 'epiretinal membrane surgery' in the YouTube search engine, the first 100 videos on this subject were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Although there are many videos about epiretinal membrane surgery on Youtube, it has been determined that these videos are low usefulness as a source and poor quality.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: In this study, our aim is to evaluate the usefulness of YouTube videos about epiretinal membrane surgery in the retina. Method: When it was scanned by typing 'epiretinal membrane surgery' in the YouTube search engine, the first 100 videos on this subject were evaluated. Then, these videos were analyzed and scored with DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and Global Quality (GQ) scoring systems. Results: DISCERN score of the evaluated videos was 30.0±7.8; JAMA score 1.5±0.6; the GQ score was found to be 1.8±0.6. When the results of epiretinal membrane surgery are evaluated according to the quality scoring of these three scoring systems, the DISCERN score is weak; the JAMA score was assessed as low quality and the GQ scoring as poor quality. Conclusion: Although there are many videos about epiretinal membrane surgery on Youtube, it has been determined that these videos are low usefulness as a source and poor quality.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada amacımız retinada oluşan epiretinal membran cerrahisiyle ilgili YouTube videolarının yararlılığını değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: YouTube arama motorunda ‘epiretinal membrane surgery’ yazarak taratıldığında, bu konuyla ilgili ilk çıkan 100 video değerlendirilmeye alındı. Daha sonra bu videolar DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) ve Global Quality (GQ) skorlama sistemleri ile analiz edilerek skorlandı. Bulgular: Değerlendirilen videoların DISCERN skoru 30.0±7.8; JAMA skoru 1.5±0.6; GQ skorlaması ise 1.8±0.6 olarak bulundu. Epiretinal membran cerrahisiyle ilgili çıkan sonuçlar bu üç skorlama sisteminin kalite skorlamasına göre değerlendirildiğinde, DISCERN skoru zayıf; JAMA skoru düşük kalite ve GQ skorlamasında ise zayıf kaliteye sahip olarak değerlendirildi. Sonuç: Youtube da epiretinal membran cerrahisi ile ilgili birçok video bulunmasına rağmen, bu videoların kaynak olarak yararlılığının düşük ve kalitesinin zayıf olduğu tespit edildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

SONGUR, M. S., ÇITIRIK, M. (2022). Epiretinal Membrane Surgery on Youtube. Van Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 327–331. https://ajindex.com/articles/645862

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Johnson MW. Epiretinal membrane. In: Yanoff M, Duker J, editors. Ophthalmology. 3rd Ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2009:p686-90
  2. Jung JJ, Hoang QV, Ridley-Lane ML, Sebrow DB, Dhrami-Gavazi E, Chang S. Long-term retrospective analysis of visual acuity and optical coherence topographic changes after single versus double peeling during vitrectomy for macular epiretinal membranes. Retina 2016;36(11):2101-2109
  3. Chang S, Gregory-Roberts EM, Park S, Laud K, Smith SD, Hoang QV. Double peeling during vitrectomy for macular pucker: the Charles L. Schepens Lecture. JAMA Ophthalmology 2013;131(4):525-530
  4. Fang XL, Tong Y, Zhou YL, Zhao PQ, Wang ZY. Internal limiting membrane peeling or not: a systematic review and meta-analysis of idiopathic macular pucker surgery. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2017;101(11):1535-1541
  5. Fox S. Pew Research Center. 2011. The social life of health information. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/05/12/t he-social-life-of-health-information-2011
  6. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS ONE 2013;8(12):e82469
  7. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53(2):105-111
  8. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis d a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 2012;39(5):899- 903
  9. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA 1997;277(15):1244-1245
  10. Weil AG, Bojanowski MW, Jamart J, Gustin T, Lévêque M. Evaluation of the quality of information on the Internet available to patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. World Neurosurg 2014; 82(1-2):31-39
  11. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine 2018;43(22):1334-1339
  12. Farag M, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N. Use of YouTube as a resource for surgical education—clarity or confusion. European Urology Focus 2020;6(3):445-449
  13. Velasco E, Agheneza T, Denecke K, Kirchner G, Eckmanns T. Social media and internet based data in global systems for public health surveillance: a systematic review. The Milbank Quarterly 2014;92(1):7-33
  14. Guthrie G, Davies RM, Fleming CK, Browning AC. YouTube as a source of information about retinitis pigmento