Journals / Uluslararası Ticaret ve Tahkim Hukuku Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF THE AGREEMENT ON TRADE FACILITATION FROM A WTO LAW POINT OF VIEW

DTÖ HUKUKU BAKIMINDAN TİCARETİN KOLAYLAŞTIRILMASI ANLAŞMASI'NIN AYIRT EDİCİ ÖZELLİKLERİ

Pages
423–442
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There is, however, one aspect of the drafting of the TFA that places this Agreement somewhat in a less fortu-nate situation, i.e. the soft language used in describing some of the obli-gations in its text.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The TFA, aimed at expediting the movement, release and clearan-ce of goods, entered into force on 22 February 2017 as a major win for the WTO with respect to its role as a forum for negotiations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Some dis-tinctive features of the TFA, which could be relevant for any future dis-pute concerning the TFA and could also serve as example for any agre-ement negotiated in the future under the auspices of the WTO, illustrate how Members were creative and willing to limit the uncertainties in the text of the Agreement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There is, however, one aspect of the drafting of the TFA that places this Agreement somewhat in a less fortu-nate situation, i.e. the soft language used in describing some of the obli-gations in its text.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The TFA, aimed at expediting the movement, release and clearan-ce of goods, entered into force on 22 February 2017 as a major win for the WTO with respect to its role as a forum for negotiations. Some dis-tinctive features of the TFA, which could be relevant for any future dis-pute concerning the TFA and could also serve as example for any agre-ement negotiated in the future under the auspices of the WTO, illustrate how Members were creative and willing to limit the uncertainties in the text of the Agreement. These features are: (i) how the TFA became part of the WTO body of law; (ii) the express provision that the exceptions and exemptions under the GATT 1994 apply to the TFA; and (iii) the specific rule on conflicts of norms. There is, however, one aspect of the drafting of the TFA that places this Agreement somewhat in a less fortu-nate situation, i.e. the soft language used in describing some of the obli-gations in its text.

🔖

Cite This Article

HERRERA, T. P. (2022). DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF THE AGREEMENT ON TRADE FACILITATION FROM A WTO LAW POINT OF VIEW. Uluslararası Ticaret ve Tahkim Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 423–442. https://ajindex.com/articles/645215

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. WTO Panel and Appellate Body Reports Appellate Body Report, Argentina – Safeguard Measures on Im-ports of Footwear, WT/DS121/AB/R, adopted 12 January 2000, DSR 2000:I, p. 515 Appellate Body Report, China – Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovi-sual Entertainment Products, WT/DS363/AB/R, adopted 19 January 2010, DSR 2010:I, p. 3 Appellate Body Report, Korea – Definitive Safeguard Measure on Imports of Certain Dairy Products, WT/DS98/AB/R, adopted 12 January 2000, DSR 2000:I, p. 3 Appellate Body Report, United States – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes, WT/DS406/AB/R, adopted 24 April 2012, DSR 2012:XI, p. 5751 Appellate Body Report, United States – Measures Relating to Shrimp from Thailand / United States – Customs Bond Directive for Merchandise Subject to Anti-Dumping/Countervailing Duties, WT/DS343/AB/R / WT/DS345/AB/R, adopted 1 August 2008, DSR 2008:VII, p. 2385 / DSR 2008:VIII, p. 2773 Appellate Body Report, United States – Measures Relating to Shrimp from Thailand / United States – Customs Bond Directive for Merchandise Subject to Anti-Dumping/Countervailing Duties, WT/DS343/AB/R / WT/DS345/AB/R, adopted 1 August 2008, DSR 2008:VII, p. 2385 / DSR 2008:VIII, p. 2773 Appellate Body Report, United States – Subsidies on Upland Cot-ton, WT/DS267/AB/R, adopted 21 March 2005, DSR 2005: I, p. 3 Appellate Body Reports, Canada – Certain Measures Affecting the Renewable Energy Generation Sector / Canada – Measures Relating to the Feed-in Tariff Program, WT/DS412/AB/R / WT/DS426/AB/R, adopted 24 May 2013, DSR 2013:I, p. 7 Appellate Body Reports, China – Measures Related to the Expor-tation of Various Raw Materials, WT/DS394/AB/R / WT/DS395/AB/R / WT/DS398/AB/R, adopted 22 February 2012, DSR 2012:VII, p. 3295 Appellate Body Reports, China – Measures Related to the Expor-tation of Rare Earths, Tungsten, and Molybdenum, WT/DS431/AB/R / WT/DS432/AB/R / WT/DS433/AB/R, adopted 29 August 2014, DSR 2014:III, p. 805 Panel Report, China – Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Enterta-inment Products, WT/DS363/R and Corr.1, adopted 19 January 2010, as modified by Appellate Body Report WT/DS363/AB/R, DSR 2010:II, p. 261 Panel Report, European Communities – Anti-Dumping Measure on Farmed Salmon from Norway, WT/DS337/R, adopted 15 January 2008, and Corr.1, DSR 2008:I, p. 3 Panel Report, Indonesia – Certain Measures Affecting the