SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 43

Predicting Romantic Relationship Satisfaction of University Students

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Romantik İlişki Doyumunu Yordaması

Ayça SARAÇ
Zeynep HAMAMCI
Sonay GÜÇRAY
Pages
69–81
Publication Date
2015-04-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that relationship situation and excess expectations, different thinking, gender differences which are sub dimensions of IRRBI and religious values, communication, friend relationships, family relationships sub dimensions of PRAS predicts relationship satisfaction signifi cantly

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to analyze the contributions of socio-demographic variables such as age, class, relationship situation, relationship duration and irrational beliefs of university students related to romantic relationships and their perceptions concerning premarital relationship to determine relationship satisfaction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research group consists of 299 university students having education in a state university of Hatay.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that relationship situation and excess expectations, different thinking, gender differences which are sub dimensions of IRRBI and religious values, communication, friend relationships, family relationships sub dimensions of PRAS predicts relationship satisfaction signifi cantly
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:romantik ilişkilerle ilgili akılcı olmayan inançlar · evlilik öncesi ilişkileri değerlendirme · ilişki doyumu

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze the contributions of socio-demographic variables such as age, class, relationship situation, relationship duration and irrational beliefs of university students related to romantic relationships and their perceptions concerning premarital relationship to determine relationship satisfaction. The research group consists of 299 university students having education in a state university of Hatay. Irrational Romantic Relationship Beliefs Inventory (IRRBI) which was developed by Sarı (2008), was used to measure the beliefs of university students about romantic relationships and in order to evaluate the perceptions of students about premarital relationship, Premarital Relationship Assessment Scale (PRAS) developed by Kalkan and Kaya (2007) was used. Furthermore, the relationship satisfaction of university students was measured by Relationship Satisfaction sub dimension (RS) of Relationship Stability Scale (RSS) developed by Rusbult, Martz and Agnew (1998) and was adapted to Turkish culture by Büyükşahin, Hasta and Hovardaoğlu, (2005). In order to determine the relationship satisfaction precursors Hierarchic Multiple Regression Analysis was used. The results showed that relationship situation and excess expectations, different thinking, gender differences which are sub dimensions of IRRBI and religious values, communication, friend relationships, family relationships sub dimensions of PRAS predicts relationship satisfaction signifi cantly

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı; cinsiyet, yaş, sınıf, ilişki durumu, ilişki süresi gibi sosyo-demografik değişkenler ile romantik ilişkilerle ilgili akılcı olmayan inançlar ve ilişki algısının ilişki doyumunu yordamadaki katkılarını incelemektir. Araştırmanın grubu Hatay’da bir devlet üniversitesinde öğrenim gören 299 üniversite öğrencisi oluşturmuştur. Öğrencilerin romantik ilişkilerle ilgili inançlarını ölçmek üzere Sarı (2008) tarafından geliştirilen Romantik İlişkilerde Akılcı Olmayan İnançlar Ölçeği (RAİNÖ), evlilik öncesi ilişki algılarını değerlendirmek üzere Kalkan ve Kaya (2007) tarafından geliştirilen Evlilik Öncesi İlişkileri Değerlendirme Ölçeği (EÖİDÖ) kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca, üniversite öğrencilerinin ilişki doyumları Rusbult, Martz ve Agnew (1998) tarafından geliştirilen Büyükşahin, Hasta ve Hovardaoğlu, (2005) tarafından Türk kültürüne uyarlanan İlişki İstikrarı Ölçeği’nin (İİÖ) İlişki Doyumu (İD) alt boyutu ile ölçülmüştür. Öğrencilerin ilişki doyumlarının yordayıcılarını belirlemek amacıyla Hiyerarşik Çoklu Regresyon Analizi uygulanmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda; bireylerin ilişki durumu, RAİNÖ’nün “Aşırı Beklentiler”, “Farklı Düşünmek” , “Cinsiyet Farklılıkları” alt boyutları ve EÖİDÖ’nün “Dini Değerler”, “İletişim”, “Arkadaş İlişkileri”, “Aile İlişkileri” alt boyutlarının ilişkiden algılanan doyumu anlamlı olarak yordadığı bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARAÇ, A., HAMAMCI, Z., GÜÇRAY, S. (2015). Predicting Romantic Relationship Satisfaction of University Students. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 43, 69–81. https://ajindex.com/articles/64494

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Chang, W. (2012). Family ties, living arrangement and marital satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Study, 14, 215-233.
  2. Christian, J.L., OLeary K. L. ve Vivian, D. (1994). Depressive symtomology in marital discordant women and men: the role of individual and relationship variables. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 32-42.
  3. Collins, W. A. (2003). More and myth: the developmental signifi adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13(1), 1-24.
  4. Collins, W. A., Welsh, D., P. ve Furman, W. (2009). Adolescent romantic relationship. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 60, 631-652.
  5. Cramer, D. (2004). Satisfaction with a romantic relationship, depression, support and confl ict. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 77, 449-461.
  6. Curun, F. (2001). The effects of sexism and sex role orientation on relationship satisfaction. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  7. Davis, M. H. ve Oathout, H.A. (1987). Maintenance of satisfaction in romantic relationships: empathy and relational competence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(2), 397-410.
  8. Ecevit, Y. (2011). Toplumsal cinsiyet sosyolojisi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  9. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: youth and crisis. New York: Norton. Feldman, S. S. ve Gowen, L. K. (1998). Confl ict negotiation tactics in romantic relationships in high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27, 691-717.
  10. Fincham, F.D., Ajayi, C. ve Beach,S.R.(2011). Spirituality and marital satisfaction in African American couples. Psychology of Religion, 3(4), 259-268.
  11. Fowers, B.J. (1991). His and her marriage: a multivariate study of gender and marital satisfaction. Sex Roles, 24(3/4), 209-221.
  12. Furman, W. (2002). The emerging fi eld of adolescent romantic relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 117-180.
  13. Gabriel, B., Beach, S.R. ve Bodenmann, G. (2010). Depression, marital satisfaction and communication in couples: investigating gender differences. Behavior Therapy, 41, 306-316.
  14. Gazioğlu-İşmen, E. (2011). Aile Yaşam Döngüsü. H. Yavuzer (Ed.), Evlilik okulu içinde (s.29-47). İstanbul:
  15. Remzi Kitabevi.
  16. Gladding, S. T. (2012). Aile terapisi: Tarihi, kuram ve uygulamaları (İ. Keklik ve İ. Yıldırım, Çev). Ankara: Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Derneği Yayınları.
  17. Goodwin, R. ve Gaines, S. O. (2004). Relationships beliefs and relationship quality across cultures: Country as a moderator of dysfunctional beliefs and relationship quality in three former