Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 21

DETERMINANTS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM TRADITIONAL AIRLINES

SERMAYE YAPISININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: GELENEKSEL HAVAYOLLARINDAN AMPİRİK KANITLAR

Pages
173–186
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, findings of the study indicate that traditional airlines operate in line with the Pecking Order Theory when determining the total debt ratio, which also means that they tend to increase total leverage level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the factors that define capital structure of airlines with traditional business model by taking into account the capital structure theories.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In line with this purpose, 31 airline companies, which have continuous financial data during the 2004-2015 period, were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, findings of the study indicate that traditional airlines operate in line with the Pecking Order Theory when determining the total debt ratio, which also means that they tend to increase total leverage level.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2004-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the factors that define capital structure of airlines with traditional business model by taking into account the capital structure theories. In line with this purpose, 31 airline companies, which have continuous financial data during the 2004-2015 period, were examined. Panel data analysis was used as a method in the study. Empirical findings of the study show that traditional airlines operate in line with the Trade-off Theory when determining their long-term debt ratio. In addition, findings of the study indicate that traditional airlines operate in line with the Pecking Order Theory when determining the total debt ratio, which also means that they tend to increase total leverage level.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı geleneksel iş modeli uygulayan havayollarının sermaye yapısını belirleyen faktörlerin sermaye yapısına ilişkin teoriler dikkate alınarak incelenmesidir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda finansal verileri 2004-2015 döneminde süreklilik gösteren 31 havayolu şirketi incelenmiştir. Çalışmada yöntem olarak panel veri analizi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın ampirik bulguları geleneksel havayollarının uzun vadeli borç oranını belirlerken Dengeleme Teorisine uygun olarak hareket ettiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Buna ek olarak çalışmanın sonuçları, geleneksel havayollarının toplam borç oranlarının belirlenmesinde Finansman Hiyerarşisi Teorisine uygun olarak hareket edildiğini diğer bir ifadeyle toplam kaldıraç düzeyini arttırma eğiliminde olunduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KİRACI, K., AYDIN, N. (2022). DETERMINANTS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM TRADITIONAL AIRLINES. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 21, 173–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/644911

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ahmad, F., Juniad-ul-Haq, Nasir, R. U., Ali, M. and Ullah, W. (2011). Extension of Determinants of Capital Structure: Evidence From Pakistani Non-Financial Firms. African Journal of Business Management, 5(28), 11375-11385.
  2. Ajanthan, A. (2013). Determinants of Capital Structure: Evidence from Hotel and Restaurant Companies in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(6), 1-8.
  3. Antoniou, A., Guney, Y. and Paudyal, K. (2008). The Determinants of Capital Structure: Capital Market-Oriented versus Bank-Oriented Institutions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43, 59-92.
  4. Arsov, S. and Naumoski, A. (2016). Determinants of Capital Structure: An Empirical Study of Companies from Selected Post-Transition Economies. Journal of Economics and Business, 34(1), 119-146.
  5. Bandyopadhyay, A. and Barua, N. M. (2016). Factors Determining Capital Structure and Corporate Performancein India: Studying the Business Cycle Effects. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 61, 1-13.
  6. Bauer, P. (2004). Determinants of Capital Structure: Empirical Evidence from the Czech Republic. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 54(1-2), 2-21.
  7. Baxamusa, M. and Jalal, A. (2014). Does Religion Affect Capital Structure? Research in International Business and Finance, 112-131.
  8. Bhaduri, S. N. (2002). Determinants of Capital Structure Choice: A Study of The Indian Corporate Sector. Applied Financial Economics, 12(1), 655-665.
  9. Bhaird, C. M. and Lucey, B. (2010). Determinants of Capital Structure in Irish SMEs. Small Bus Econ, 35(1), 357–375.
  10. Bontempi, M. E. (2002). The Dynamic Specification of the Modified Pecking Order Theory: Its Relevance to Italy. Empirical Economics, 27(1), 1-22.
  11. Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Demirguc-Kunt, A. and Maksimovic, V. (2001). Capital Structures in Developing Countries. The Journal of Finance, 56(1), 87-130.
  12. Chakraborty, I. (2010). Capital Structure in An Emerging Stock Market: The Case of India. Research in International Business and Finance, 24(1), 295–314.
  13. Chen, J. J. (2004). Determinants of Capital Structure of Chinese-Listed Companies. Journal of Business Research, 57(12), 1341-1351.
  14. Colombo, E. (2001). Determinants of Corporate Capital Structure: Evidence from Hungarian Firms. Applied Economics, 33(1), 1689-1701.
  15. Cotei, C. and Farhat, J. (2009). The Trade-Off Theory and the Pecking Order Theory: Are They Mutually Exclusive? North American Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 3(3), 1-17.
  16. Deesomsak, R., Paudyal, K. an