Journals / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for incarcerated rectal prolapse (Altemeier's procedure)

Pages
217–220
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We aimed to present perineal rectosigmoidectomy and diverting loop colostomy in a patient with neurological disability due to spinal trauma and incarcerated rectal prolapse.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Perineal procedures have higher recurrence and lower mortality rates than abdominal alternatives for the treatment of rectal prolapse.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Perineal rectosigmoidectomy is one of the treatment options in patients with incarceration and strangulation, with low mortality and acceptable recurrence rates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We aimed to present perineal rectosigmoidectomy and diverting loop colostomy in a patient with neurological disability due to spinal trauma and incarcerated rectal prolapse.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Perineal procedures have higher recurrence and lower mortality rates than abdominal alternatives for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Presence of incarceration and strangulation also influences treatment choice. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy is one of the treatment options in patients with incarceration and strangulation, with low mortality and acceptable recurrence rates. This operation can be performed especially to avoid general anesthesia in old patients with co-morbidities. We aimed to present perineal rectosigmoidectomy and diverting loop colostomy in a patient with neurological disability due to spinal trauma and incarcerated rectal prolapse.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, E., KÜLAH, B., AYTEKİN, F. Ö., BANLI, O., BÖREKÇİ, H., SİPAHİ, M. (2022). Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for incarcerated rectal prolapse (Altemeier's procedure). Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 217–220. https://ajindex.com/articles/643857

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Yuzbasioglu MF, Bulbuloglu E, Ozkaya M, Oksuz H. A different approach to incarcerated and complicated rectal prolapse. Med Sci Monit 2008; 14: 60-63.
  2. Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA. Rectal prolapse, rectal intussuscep- tion, rectocele and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001; 30: 199-222. [CrossRef] Kairaluoma MV, Kellokumpu IH. Epidemiologic aspects of comp- lete rectal prolapse. Scand J Surg 2005; 94: 207-210. 219 Govaert B, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG. Neuromodulation for functional bowel disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 23: 545-553. [CrossRef] Bordeianou L, Hicks CW, Kaiser AM, Alavi K, Sudan R, Wise PE. Rec- tal prolapse: An overview of clinical features, diagnosis and pati- ent-specific management strategies. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18: 1059-1069. [CrossRef] Poylin V, Bensley R, Nagle D. Changing approaches to rectal pro- lapse repair in the elderly. Gastroenterol Rep 2013; 1: 198-202. [CrossRef] Thandinkosi E, Mirza K, Steven D. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 63-73. [CrossRef] Voulimeneas I, Antonopoulos C, Alifierakis E, Ioannides P. Perine- al rectosigmoidectomy for gangrenous rectal prolapse. Word J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 2689-2691. [CrossRef] Fei R, Chen W, Xiang T, Sheng Q, Wang J, Liu F. A modified two- stage perineal rectosigmoidectomy for incarcerated rectal pro- lapse. Tech Coloproctol 2014; 18: 513-514. [CrossRef] Kapan M, Önder A, Polat S, Aliosmanoglu İ, Taskesen F, Arikanog- lu Z, ve ark. Rektal prolapsus cerrahi tedavisinde abdominal ve perineal yaklaşımlar. Dicle Tıp Derg 2012; 39: 83-88. [CrossRef]