Journals / Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Ali Canip Yöntem’in eğitim ve edebiyat eğitimi hakkındaki düşünceleri

Pages
397–415
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The present study aims to reveal Ali Canip Yöntem’s ideas on literature education and his importance in and contribution to the Turkish literature history together with the coursebooks he penned.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In Turkey, more ideas were generated and more effort was spent on education after Tanzimat.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ali Canip Yöntem also served in the preparation of the first Turkish-Literature programs in 1924 and rendered his critics and suggestions about them.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The present study aims to reveal Ali Canip Yöntem’s ideas on literature education and his importance in and contribution to the Turkish literature history together with the coursebooks he penned.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In Turkey, more ideas were generated and more effort was spent on education after Tanzimat. Following this period, westernized education understandings’ becoming dominant in the country and the opening of western schools were important education movements. Ali Canip Yöntem put forward his first ideas on education after the Second Constitutional period. Yet it is observed that his ideas on education and literature education grew rich and were put into practice during the Republican Period. Ali Canip Yöntem also served in the preparation of the first Turkish-Literature programs in 1924 and rendered his critics and suggestions about them. Ali Canip Yöntem contributed to literaure education by penning literature coursebooks and workbooks as well. The present study aims to reveal Ali Canip Yöntem’s ideas on literature education and his importance in and contribution to the Turkish literature history together with the coursebooks he penned.

Özet

Türkiye’de eğitim üzerindeki fikirler ve çabalar Tanzimat’tan sonra hızlanmıştır. Tanzimat’tan sonra Batılı eğitim anlayışlarının ülkede hâkim olması ve Batılı okulların açılması önemli eğitim hareketleridir. Ali Canip Yöntem, eğitim hakkındaki ilk fikirlerini II. Meşrutiyet’ten sonra ortaya koymuştur. Eğitim ve edebiyat eğitimi hakkındaki fikirlerinin ise Cumhuriyet döneminde zenginleştiği ve uygulamaya geçtiği görülmektedir. Ali Canip Yöntem, 1924’te ilk Türkçe-Edebiyat programlarının hazırlanmasında görev almış, bu program hakkında eleştiri ve önerilerini ortaya koymuştur. Ali Canip Yöntem, edebiyat eğitimine edebiyat dersleri için ders kitabı ve yardımcı ders kitabı yazarak da katkıda bulunmuştur. Araştırma, Ali Canip Yöntem edebiyat eğitimi hakkındaki fikirleri ve yazdığı ders kitaplarıyla Türk eğitim tarihindeki önemini ve katkısını ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

OGUR, E. (2022). Ali Canip Yöntem’in eğitim ve edebiyat eğitimi hakkındaki düşünceleri. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 397–415. https://ajindex.com/articles/643580

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In: K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 13-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Barron, A. 2003. Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: learning how to do things. Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Billmyer, K., 1990a. I really like your lifestyle: ESL learners learning how to compliment. Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 6 (2), 31– 48. Billmyer, K., 1990b. I really like your lifestyle: ESL learners learning how to compliment. Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 6, 31–48.
  3. Bouton, L.F. (1994a). Can NNS skill in interpreting implicature in American English be improved through explicit instruction? A pilot study. In: L. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds), Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series, vol. 5. Division of English as an International Language (pp. 88-109).
  4. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois. Bouton, L. F. (1994b). Conversational implicature in a second language: Learned slowly when not deliberately taught. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 157-167.
  5. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. 1978/1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative Competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 5-35.
  7. Cheng, W. 2003. Intercultural Conversation: A Study of Hong Kong Chinese. Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Fukuya, Y., & Clark, M. (2001). A comparison of input enhancement and explicit instruction of mitigators. In: L. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph Series, vol. 10. Division of English as an International Language (pp. 111-130).
  8. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois. Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor. Holtgraves, T. (1998). Interpreting Indirect Replies. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 1-27.
  9. Holtgraves, T. (2005).
  10. Social Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, and Linguistic Politeness. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture,1, 73-93.
  11. House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18, 225-52.
  12. Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? (NetWork #6) [HTML document]. Honolul