SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Yoğun Bakım Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

Effects of Different Gastric Residual Volume Thresholds on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Receiving Intensive Care

Yoğun Bakım Hastalarında Farklı Gastrik Rezidüel Volüm Eşiklerinin Morbidite ve Mortalite Üzerine Etkileri

Ahmet Oğuzhan KÜÇÜK
Sertaç ÇANKAYA
Esra ÇANKAYA
Hülya ULUSOY
Pages
158–166
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The amounts of calories and proteins provided after 14 days were significantly higher in group 2 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Enteral feeding is often limited by gastrointestinal intolerance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, there is no consensus on the threshold value of gastric residual volume (GRV) on adjusting the enteral feeding rate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The amounts of calories and proteins provided after 14 days were significantly higher in group 2 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Enteral feeding is often limited by gastrointestinal intolerance. However, there is no consensus on the threshold value of gastric residual volume (GRV) on adjusting the enteral feeding rate. This study aimed to determine the effects of GRV thresholds of 150 mL and 250 mL on reaching calorie and protein targets and to determine gastric intolerance in patients receiving intensive care and enteral feeding. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, patients who were treated and followed in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our clinic between 2008 and 2017 were examined for 14 days after hospitalisation. Caloric values, protein values, presence of gastric intolerance, morbidity, and mortality factors of the patients, who were divided into two groups with 150 mL (group 1) and 250 mL (group 2) GRV thresholds, were examined. Results: The amounts of calories and proteins provided after 14 days were significantly higher in group 2 (p

Özet

: Enteral beslenme sıklıkla gastrointestinal intolerans nedeniyle kısıtlanır. Enteral beslenme hızının gastrik rezidüel volüme (GRV) göre ayarlanmasının eşik değeri konusunda fikir birliği yoktur. Bu çalışmanın amacı enteral beslenme uygulanmakta olan yoğun bakım hastalarında, 150 mL ve 250 mL GRV eşiklerinin hedef kalori ve proteine ulaşma miktarını, morbidite ve mortaliteye etkilerinin saptanmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma klinik retrospektif olarak planlandı ve 2008-2017 tarihleri arasındaki dönemde kliniğimiz yoğun bakım ünitesinde (YBÜ) takip ve tedavisi yapılan hastalar yatış anından itibaren 14 gün süreyle incelendi. GRV eşiğine göre 150 mL (grup 1) ve 250 mL (grup 2) olacak şekilde 2 gruba ayrılan hastaların kalori değerleri, protein değerleri, gastrik intolerans oluşumu, morbidite ve mortalite faktörleri incelendi. Bulgular: On dört gün sonunda verilebilen kalori-protein oranları grup 2’de anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜÇÜK, A. O., ÇANKAYA, S., ÇANKAYA, E., ULUSOY, H. (2022). Effects of Different Gastric Residual Volume Thresholds on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Receiving Intensive Care. Türk Yoğun Bakım Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 158–166. https://ajindex.com/articles/643394

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Waitzberg DL, Correia MI, Echenique M, Ize-Lamache L, Soto JK, Mijares JM, et al. Total nutritional therapy: a nutrition education program for physicians. Nutr Hosp 2004;19:28-33
  2. Roberts PZG. Enteral nutrition. In: Rippe J, Irwin R, Albert JF M, editors. Intensive Care Medicine. 2nd ed. USA: Litthle Brown and Company; 2003. p. 875-98
  3. Genton L, Kudsk KA, Reese SR, Ikeda S. Enteral feeding preserves gut Th-2 cytokines despite mucosal cellular adhesion molecule-1 blockade. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2005;29:44-7
  4. Kirby DF, Delegge MH, Fleming CR. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on tube feeding for enteral nutrition. Gastroenterology 1995;108:1282-301
  5. Okamoto K, Fukatsu K, Ueno C, Shinto E, Hashiguchi Y, Nagayoshi H, et al. T lymphocyte numbers in human gut associated lymphoid tissue are reduced without enteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2005;29:56-8
  6. Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, Gramlich L, Dodek P; Canadian Critical Care Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2003;27:355-73
  7. Chang WK, McClave SA, Lee MS, Chao YC. Monitoring bolus nasogastric tube feeding by the Brix value determination and residual volume measurement of gastric contents. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2004;28:105-12
  8. Desachy A, Clavel M, Vuagnat A, Normand S, Gissot V, François B. Initial efficacy and tolerability of early enteral nutrition with immediate or gradual introduction in intubated patients. Intensive Care Med 2008;34:1054-9
  9. Lin HC, Van Citters GW. Stopping enteral feeding for arbitrary gastric residual volume may not be physiologically sound: results of a computer simulation model. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1997;21:286-9
  10. Heidegger CP, Darmon P, Pichard C. Enteral vs. parenteral nutrition for the critically ill patient: a combined support should be preferred. Curr Opin Crit Care 2008;14:408-14
  11. Pinilla JC, Samphire J, Arnold C, Liu L, Thiessen B. Comparison of gastrointestinal tolerance to two enteral feeding protocols in critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2001;25:81-6
  12. Klompas M. Does this patient have ventilator-associated pneumonia? JAMA 2007;297:1583-93
  13. Organization WH. Prevention of hospitalacquired infections: a practical guide. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organizati