Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Changes in Agricultural Structure, Rural Area and Demography

Pages
1–8
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Integrated rural development approaches, including basic services such as education and health, are indispensable for the population to be permanent in rural areas.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Structures of agricultural holdings have been changing rapidly in rural areas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:FRS records between 2003-2020 were used in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Integrated rural development approaches, including basic services such as education and health, are indispensable for the population to be permanent in rural areas.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Structures of agricultural holdings have been changing rapidly in rural areas. While smallholders have been decreasing in number, the number of large farms has been increasing. Youth has been rapidly moving away from agriculture. The agricultural sector has faced an aging problem. The involvement of youth and smallholders in agricultural production is extremely important for food supply security. This study aimed to observe the structural change of agricultural holdings based on the Farmer Registration System (FRS) data. The answers to the following questions were sought. Has the numerical and proportional distribution of enterprises changed according to their size? Has youth been moving away from agriculture? FRS records between 2003-2020 were used in the study. Agricultural holdings were grouped according to their size and the age of farmers. Results were summarized in tables and graphics. There was a decrease in the number and rate of farmers under the age of 40, and a proportional increase in the number of farmers over 65. While the number of agricultural holdings larger than 500 increased 2.5 times, the number and rate of small farms decreased. Migration from the districts and villages in the study area has been observed at rates ranging from 22% to 59% in 20 years. Special measures should be taken for youth and small farms to survive in the agricultural sector. Tools such as tax exemption and social security support can be used. Integrated rural development approaches, including basic services such as education and health, are indispensable for the population to be permanent in rural areas.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRBÜK, M. (2022). Changes in Agricultural Structure, Rural Area and Demography. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/642528

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Anonim 2018. Kırsal Kalkınma Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu. Available from: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/ 2020/04/KirsalKalkinmaOzelIhtisasKomisyonuRaporu.pdf [Accessed 10 February 2021] Bolliger F. 2016. Structural change in Brazilian agriculture. PROCEEDINGS ICAS VII Seventh International Conference on Agricultural Statistics. Rome, Italy, 24-26 October 2016, pp: 41-47.
  2. Brand N, Galdava E. 2021. Engaging Youth in Agriculture. USAID. Available from: https://www.usaid.gov/sites/ default/files/documents/15396/Feed-the-Future-CaseStudyYouth-Ag-ICT.pdf [Accessed 15 March 2021] EC, 2016. European Commission. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/keypolicies/common-agricultural-policy/income-support/youngfarmers_en#youngpeopleinfarming [Accessed 10 March 2021] EU, 2018a. European Commission. Land Cover and Land Use. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/ food-farming-fisheries/farming/documents/land-coveruse_en.pdf [Accessed 10 March 2021] EU, 2018b. European Commission. Farm Structures. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/food-farmingfisheries/farming/documents/farm-structures_en.pdf [Accessed 10 March 2021] FAO, 2014. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Youth and Agriculture: Key Challenges and Concrete Solutions. Available from: http://www.fao.org/ 3/i3947e/i3947e.pdf [Accessed 01 March 2021]
  3. FAO, IFAD, UNDP, 2020. Covid-19: Rapid Impact Assessment on the Agri-Food Sector and Rural Areas in Turkey. Available from: https://www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/ en/home/library/poverty/covid-19-impact-assessment.html [Accessed 24 April 2021] FAO, 2017. The future of food and agriculture – Trends and challenges. Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/i6583e/i6583e.pdf IFAD, 2013. International Fund for Agricultural Development. Smallholders, food security, and the environment. Available from: https://www.ifad.org/documents/38714170/39135645/ smallholders_report.pdf/133e8903-0204-4e7d-a780- bca847933f2e [Accessed 23 February 2021]
  4. Jürgenson E, Rasva M. 2020. The Changing Structure and Concentration of Agricultural Land Holdings in Estonia and Possible Threat for Rural Areas. Land. 9(2) https:// doi.org/10.3390/land9020041 Karakuş K, Karakuş S, Çelikyürek H. 2019. Ülke Toprakları ve Tarım Arazilerinin Bitkisel ve Hayvansal Üretim Faaliyeti Dışında Kullanımı. Hayvan Bilimi ve Ürünleri Dergisi, 2(1): 84-90. jasp/issue/51546/6