Journals / Türk Psikoloji Yazıları / 2020 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 46

Perceived Partner Responsiveness in Personal and Relational Contexts: A Review Study

Bireysel ve İlişkisel Bağlamda Algılanan Partner Duyarlığı: Derleme Çalışması

Pages
88–103
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, considering the implications of PPR, some recommendations are suggested for further studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Perceived partner responsiveness (PPR) reflects the evaluation of a romantic partner’s understanding, validating, and caring for in times of one’s need (Reis & Shaver, 1988).
📊
Key Findings & Data:PPR has critical implications for both the individual and relational outcomes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, considering the implications of PPR, some recommendations are suggested for further studies.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Perceived partner responsiveness (PPR) reflects the evaluation of a romantic partner’s understanding, validating, and caring for in times of one’s need (Reis & Shaver, 1988). PPR has critical implications for both the individual and relational outcomes. A number of processes and structures in close relationships include PPR at different levels. Several theoretical approaches (e.g., attachment theory, self-determination theory) support the role of PPR in personal and relational processes. Thus, this paper presents a literature review on the-state-of-the-art on the role of PPR in romantic relationships. In this context, abundant studies documenting the effect of PPR on both psychological and physical well-being, self-regulation processes, and relationship functioning are examined. Moreover, studies examining the potential predictors of PPR and proposed recent conceptual models explaining the role of PPR in romantic relationships are presented. Finally, considering the implications of PPR, some recommendations are suggested for further studies.

Özet

Algılanan partner duyarlığı (APD) kişinin ihtiyaç duyduğu anlarda romantik partnerinin onu ne kadar anladığını, ona ne kadar değer verdiğini ve ilgi gösterdiğini değerlendirdiği bir süreçtir (Reis ve Shaver, 1988). APD’nin hem bireysel hem de yakın ilişkiler bakımından önemli sonuçları vardır. Yakın ilişkilerle ilgili birçok yapı belirli düzeylerde APD’yi kapsar. Birçok kuramsal yaklaşım (örn., bağlanma kuramı, öz-belirleme kuramı) da APD’nin kişisel ve ilişkisel süreçlerdeki önemine vurgu yapmaktadır. Bu nedenle APD ile ilgili çalışmalar özellikle son on yılda artan bir ivmeyle ön plana çıkmıştır. Bu yazıda APD’nin romantik ilişki yazınındaki yerini inceleyen mevcut çalışmalar derlenmiştir. Bu kapsamda, önce APD’nin psikolojik ve fiziksel esenlik, benlik düzenleme süreçleri ve ilişkisel işleyiş üzerindeki olumlu katkılarını saptayan çok sayıda çalışmanın bulguları özetlenmiştir. Sonra, APD’nin olası yordayıcıları ve romantik ilişkilerdeki rolünü açıklayan güncel modelleri sunulmuştur. Son olarak, bulguların kritik doğurgularına ilişkin değerlendirmelere ve gelecek çalışmalara yönelik bazı önerilere yer verilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sümer, N., Kırımer-Aydınlı, F. (2022). Perceived Partner Responsiveness in Personal and Relational Contexts: A Review Study. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 46, 88–103. https://ajindex.com/articles/642100

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Adair, K. C., Boulton, A. J. ve Algoe, A. B. (2018). The effect of mindfulness on relationship satisfaction via perceived responsiveness: Findings from a dyadic study of heterosexual romantic partners. Mindfulness, 9, 597-609. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0801-3
  2. Algoe, S. B. ve Zhaoyang, R. (2016). Positive psychology in context: Effects of expressing gratitude in ongoing relationships depend on perceptions of enactor responsiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(4), 399-415. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2015.1117131 Bar-Kalifa, E., Bar-Kalifa, L., Rafaeli, E., George-Levi, S. ve Vilchinsky, N. (2016). Relational entitlement moderates the associations between support matching and perceived partner responsiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.08.009 Bar-Kalifa, E., Hen-Weissberg, A. ve Rafaeli, E. (2015). Perceived partner responsiveness mediates the association between social anxiety and relationship satisfaction in committed couples. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34(7), 587-610. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2015.34.7.587 Bar-Kalifa, E. ve Rafaeli, E. (2013). Disappointment’s sting is greater than help’s balm: Quasi-signal detection of daily support matching. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(6), 956-967. doi: 10.1037/ a0034905 Beck, L. A., Pietromonaco, P. R., DeVito, C. C., Powers, S. I. ve Boyle, A. M. (2014). Congruence Between Spouses’ Perceptions and Observers’ Ratings of Responsiveness: The Role of Attachment Avoidance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 164-174. doi: 10.1177/0146167213507779 Berrios, R., Totterdell, P. ve Niven, K. (2015). Why do you make us feel good? Correlates and interpersonal consequences of affective presence in speed-dating. European Journal of Personality, 29, 72-82. doi: 10.1002/per.1944
  3. Birnbaum, G. E., Ein-Dor, T., Reis, H. T. ve Segal, N. (2014). Why do men prefer nice women? Gender typicality mediates the effect of responsiveness on perceived attractiveness in initial acquaintanceships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(10), 1341-1353. doi: 10.1177/0146167214543879. Birnbaum, G. E. ve Reis, H. T. (2012). When does responsiveness pique sexual interest? Attachment and sexual desire in initial acquaintanceships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(7), 946-958. doi: 10.1177/0146167212441028 Birnbaum, G. E., Reis, H. T., Mizrahi, M., Kanat-Maymon, Y., Sass, O. ve Granovski-Milner, C. (2016). Intimately connected: The importance of partner respons