SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Otorinolarengoloji Arşivi / 2017 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 4

Paranasal Sinus Anatomic Variations Accompanying Maxillary Sinus Retention Cysts: A Radiological Analysis

Maksiller Sinüs Retansiyon Kistlerine Eşlik Eden Paranasal Sinüs Anatomik Varyasyonları: Radyolojik Analiz

İbrahim ÇUKUROVA
İlker Burak ARSLAN
Erhan DEMİRHAN
Süreyya Hikmet KOZCU
Sinan ULUYOL
Yeliz PEKÇEVİK
Pages
162–171
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that RCMs are associated with pathologies that increase paranasal inflammation, such as osteomeatal complex obstruction, and are good markers for nasal-pa- ranasal sinus anomalies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:nasal septal deviation are pathologies that accompany RCMs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When unilateral RCMs were compared with the normal side, significant correlations were observed between RCMs and osteomeatal complex obstructi- on, accessory ostium, and middle turbinate anomalies (p=0.001, p=0.016, and p=0.03, respectively).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that RCMs are associated with pathologies that increase paranasal inflammation, such as osteomeatal complex obstruction, and are good markers for nasal-pa- ranasal sinus anomalies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

nasal septal deviation are pathologies that accompany RCMs. When unilateral RCMs were compared with the normal side, significant correlations were observed between RCMs and osteomeatal complex obstructi- on, accessory ostium, and middle turbinate anomalies (p=0.001, p=0.016, and p=0.03, respectively). RCMs were commonly found on the same side as osteomeatal complex obstruction (p=0.001), middle turbinate ano- malies (p=0.001), and accessory ostium (p=0.052). Conclusions: In this study, the coexistence of osteomeatal complex obstruction, accessory ostium, middle turbinate anomalies, and nasal septum deviation with RCMs was analyzed by investigating PNsCT findings in 5166 patients. The results show that RCMs are associated with pathologies that increase paranasal inflammation, such as osteomeatal complex obstruction, and are good markers for nasal-pa- ranasal sinus anomalies. The presence of incidental RCMs should be a warning sign of nasal-paranasal sinus anomalies

Özet

Amaç: Maksiller sinüs retansiyon kistleri (MsRK) radyolojik incelemelerde sık karşılaşılan bulgular olmakla birlikte, MsRK'lerin gelişimi için risk faktörleri açık değildir. Bu çalışma MsRK'ler ile diğer nazal-paranazal sinüs anomalileri arasındaki korelasyonu değerlendirmek ve bu anomalilerin MsRK gelişimi için olası etkilerini ortaya koymak amacıyla yürütülmüştür.Yöntemler: Çalışmada, 5166 hastanın paranazal sinüs bilgisayarlı tomografi (PNsBT) görüntüleri geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. PNsBT görüntülerinde MsRK'ler ile osteomeatal kompleks obstrüksiyonu, aksesuar ostium varlığı, orta konka anomalileri, nazal septal deviasyon arasındaki korelasyonlar analiz edildi. MsRK olan taraftaki paranasal sinüs anomalileri, olmayan tarafla karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: MsRK, 5166 hastanın 1429'unda (%27.6) toplamda 1880 olmak üzere saptandı. MsRK'lerin %88.7'sine en az bir nazal-paranazal sinus anomalisi eşlik etti. Azalan sırada; osteomeatal kompleks obstrüksiyonu, aksesuar ostium, orta konka anomalisi ve nazal septum deviasyonu, MsRK'lere eşlik eden patolojilerdi

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇUKUROVA, İ., ARSLAN, İ. B., DEMİRHAN, E., KOZCU, S. H., ULUYOL, S., PEKÇEVİK, Y. (2022). Paranasal Sinus Anatomic Variations Accompanying Maxillary Sinus Retention Cysts: A Radiological Analysis. Türk Otorinolarengoloji Arşivi, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 4, 162–171. https://ajindex.com/articles/640242

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Erdağ TK, Kurtoğlu G. Web of Science Kulak Burun Boğaz dergilerinde en çok atıf alan 100 Türk makalesi. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 53: 112-9
  2. Roy D, Hughes JP, Jones AS, Fenton JE. Citation analysis of otorhinolaryngology journals. J Laryngol Otol 2002; 116: 363-6
  3. Frankerberger R, Van Meerbeek B. The importance of citations and citation metrics in science J Adhes Dent 2015; 17: 487
  4. Sangwal K. Some citation-related characteristics of scientific journals published in individual countries. Scientometrics 2013; 97: 719-41
  5. Moustafa K. Aberration of the Citation. Account Res 2016; 23: 230-44
  6. Masic I. The importance of proper citation of references in biomedical articles. Acta Inform Med 2013; 21: 148-55
  7. Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Gerasimov AN, Kostyukova EI, Kitas GD. Preserving the integrity of citations and references by all stakeholders of science communication. J Korean Med Sci 2015; 30: 1545-52
  8. Campbell FM. National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1990; 78: 376-82
  9. Grange RI. National bias in citations in urology journals: parochialism or availability? BJU Int 1999; 84: 601-3
  10. Van Noorden R. Brazilian citation scheme outed. Nature 2013; 500: 510-1
  11. Foo JY. Impact of excessive journal self-citations: a case study on the Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica journal. Sci Eng Ethics 2011; 17: 65-73
  12. Utrobičić A, Chaudhry N, Ghaffar A, Marušić A. Bridging knowledge translation gap in health in developing countries: visibility, impact and publishing standards in journals from the Eastern Mediterranean. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12: 66
  13. Man JP, Weinkauf JG, Tsang M, Sin DD. Why do some countries publish more than others? An international comparison of research funding, English proficiency and publication output in highly ranked general medical journals. Eur J Epidemiol 2004; 19: 811-7
  14. Meijaard E, Cardillo M, Meijaard EM, Possingham HP. Geographic bias in citation rates of conservation research. Conserv Biol 2015; 29: 920-5
  15. Annalingam A, Damayanthi H, Jayawardena R, Ranasinghe P. Determinants of the citation rate of medical research publications from a developing country. Springerplus 2014; 3: 140
  16. Erdağ TK, Doğan E, Ecevit MC, Durmuşoğlu M, Güneri EA, İkiz AÖ. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of four national otorhinolaryngology journals between 2002 and 2010. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2013; 23: 260-7.