SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Otorinolarengoloji Arşivi / 2018 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2

Impact of Hard Palate Angulation Caused by Septal Deviation on Maxillary Sinus Volume

Murat ÖGETÜRK
Ahmet KAVAKLI
Emrah SAPMAZ
Hilal Irmak SAPMAZ
Pages
75–80
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The volumeof the maxillary sinus on the deviated side was lessthan that of the opposite side, and the differences between the volumes of both sinuses were statisticallysignificant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate the effect of hard palate angulation caused by septal deviation on the volume ofthe maxillary sinus.Methods: Coronal computed tomographic (CT)scans of 1568 patients aged from 18 to 60 were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:CT scans of 402 patients were included in thestudy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The volumeof the maxillary sinus on the deviated side was lessthan that of the opposite side, and the differences between the volumes of both sinuses were statisticallysignificant (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of hard palate angulation caused by septal deviation on the volume ofthe maxillary sinus.Methods: Coronal computed tomographic (CT)scans of 1568 patients aged from 18 to 60 were examined. CT scans of 402 patients were included in thestudy. On these scans, the maxillary sinus volume, theangle of the nasal septal deviation, and the angulationof the hard palate were calculated using the ImageJsoftware. Each maxillary sinus volume was statistically compared with each other and with those in thecontrol group. Correlations between palatal angulation and septal deviation were determined.Results: Deviated nasal septum whether with orwithout deflection of the hard palate was noted tohave caused changes in the volume of the maxillarysinus in both female and male patients. The volumeof the maxillary sinus on the deviated side was lessthan that of the opposite side, and the differences between the volumes of both sinuses were statisticallysignificant (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖGETÜRK, M., KAVAKLI, A., SAPMAZ, E., SAPMAZ, H. I. (2022). Impact of Hard Palate Angulation Caused by Septal Deviation on Maxillary Sinus Volume. Türk Otorinolarengoloji Arşivi, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2, 75–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/640180

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Shapiro R, Schorr S. A consideration of the systemic factors that influence frontal sinus pneumatization. Invest Radiol 1980; 15: 191-202. [CrossRef ] Fatu C, Puisoru M, Rotaru M, Truta AM. Morphometric evaluation of the frontal sinus in relation to age. Ann Anat 2006; 188: 275-80. [CrossRef ] Cho SH, Kim TH, Kim KR, Lee JM, Lee DK, Kim JH, et al. Factors for maxillary sinus volume and craniofacial anatomical features in adults with chronic rhinosinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136: 610-5. [CrossRef ] D’Ascanio L, Lancione C, Pompa G, Rebuffini E, Mansi N, Manzini M. Craniofacial growth in children with nasal septum deviation: a cephalometric comparative study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 74: 1180-3. [CrossRef ] Sooknundun M, Kacker SK, Bhatia R, Deka RC. Nasal septal deviation: effective intervention and long term follow-up. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1986; 12: 65-72. [CrossRef ] Kapusuz Gencer Z, Ozkiris M, Okur A, Karacavus S, Saydam L. The effect of nasal septal deviation on maxillary sinus volumes and development of maxillary sinusitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270: 3069-73. [CrossRef ] Orhan I, Ormeci T, Aydin S, Altin G, Urger E, Soylu E, et al. Morphometric analysis of the maxillary sinus in patients with nasal septum deviation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 271: 727- 32. [CrossRef ] Park IH, Song JS, Choi H, Kim TH, Hoon S, Lee SH, et al. Volumetric study in the development of paranasal sinuses by CT imaging in Asian: a pilot study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 74: 1347-50. [CrossRef ] Emami AJ, Brodsky L, Pizzuto M. Neonatal septoplasty: Case report and review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngo. 1996; 35: 271-5. [CrossRef ] Chintapatla S, Kudva YC, Nayar RC, Raghuveer TS, Prasad D. Septal deviation in neonates. Indian Pediatr 1989; 26: 678-82.
  2. Korantzis A, Cardamakis E, Chelidonis E, Papamihalis T. Nasal septum deformity in the newborn infant during labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992; 44: 41-6. [CrossRef ] Delaire J, Precious D. Influence of the nasal septum on maxillonasal growth in patients with congenital labiomaxillary cleft. Cleft Palate J 1986; 23: 270-7.
  3. Holton NE, Yokley TR, Figueroa A. Nasal septal and craniofacial form in European- and African-derived populations. J Anat 2012; 221: 263-74. [CrossRef ] Grymer LF, Pallisgaard C, Melsen B. The nasal septum in relation to the development of the nasomaxillary complex: a study in identical twins. Laryngoscope 1991; 101: 8