SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Otorinolarengoloji Arşivi / 2018 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2

Audiological Results of Total Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis with Cartilage Shoe Technique

Gökçe AKSOY YILDIRIM
Levent OLGUN
Gözde CEYLAN
Hacı KAPLANKIRAN
Abdullah DALĞIÇ
Mehmet Emrah CEYLAN
Pages
95–101
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There were statistically significant differences regarding AC thresholds and air–bone gap (ABG) values between Groups 1 and 2 atthe postoperative 12th month (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigatefunctional results of total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) shaft stabilization with a cartilage shoein chronic otitis media patients with cholesteatomawho had undergone canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy (CWDT).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patientswith cartilage shoe were classified as Group 1 (n=30)and those without the shoe were classified as Group2 (n=30).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There were statistically significant differences regarding AC thresholds and air–bone gap (ABG) values between Groups 1 and 2 atthe postoperative 12th month (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigatefunctional results of total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) shaft stabilization with a cartilage shoein chronic otitis media patients with cholesteatomawho had undergone canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy (CWDT). In addition, it was determinedwhether the presence of granular and edematous mucosa in middle ear altered functional outcomes.Methods: Sixty patients, who had undergone CWDTwith the use of TORP for the reconstruction of ossicular chain, were divided into two groups. Patientswith cartilage shoe were classified as Group 1 (n=30)and those without the shoe were classified as Group2 (n=30). Patients in both groups were classified into“A” and “B” subgroups according to the middle ear riskindex (MERI). Air conduction (AC) and bone conduction thresholds were evaluated preoperatively andpostoperatively.Results: There was no statistically significant changebetween preoperative AC thresholds of the groupsand subgroups (p>0.05). There were statistically significant differences regarding AC thresholds and air–bone gap (ABG) values between Groups 1 and 2 atthe postoperative 12th month (p

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, G. A., OLGUN, L., CEYLAN, G., KAPLANKIRAN, H., DALĞIÇ, A., CEYLAN, M. E. (2022). Audiological Results of Total Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis with Cartilage Shoe Technique. Türk Otorinolarengoloji Arşivi, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2, 95–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/640174

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Whittemore KR Jr, Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ. Acoustic mechanisms: canal wall-up versus canal wall-down mastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 118: 751-61. [CrossRef ] McElveen JT, Goode RL, Miller C, Falk SA. Effect of mastoid cavity modification on middle ear sound transmission. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; 91: 526-32. [CrossRef ] Cook JA, Krishnan S, Fagan PA. Hearing results following modified radical versus canal-up mastoidectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105: 379-83. [CrossRef ] Kim MB, Choi J, Lee JK, Park JY, Chu H, Cho YS et al. Hearing outcomes according to the types of mastoidectomy: A comparison between canal wall up and canal wall down mastoidectomy. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 3: 203-6. [CrossRef ] Azevedo AF, Soares AB, Garchet HQ, Sousa NJ. Tympanomastoidectomy: Comparison between canal wall-down and canal wall-up techniques in surgery for chronic otitis media. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 17: 242-5.
  2. Tos M, Lau T. Hearing after surgery for cholesteatoma using various techniques. Auris Nasus Larynx 1989; 16: 61-73. [CrossRef ] Zenner HP, Freitag HG, Linti C, Steinhardt U, Rodriguez Jorge J, Preyer S et al. Acoustomechanical properties of open TTP titanium middle ear prosthesis. Hear Res 2004; 192: 36-46. [CrossRef ] Fisch U, May J. Tympanoplasty, myringoplasty, ossiculoplasty, special applications with tympanoplasty. In: Fisch U, May J, eds. Tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy and stapes surgery, New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc 1994; 2-144.
  3. Cox MD, Russell JS, Dornhoffer JL. TORP ossiculoplasty outcomes with and without a stapes footplate prosthesis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 152: 501-5. [CrossRef ] O'Connell BP, Rizk HG, Hutchinson T, Nguyen SA, Lambert PR. Long-term outcomes of titanium ossiculoplasty in chronic otitis media. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 154: 1084-92. [CrossRef ] Dornhoffer JL, Gardner E. Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty: a statistical staging system. Otol Neurotol 2001; 22: 299-304. [CrossRef ] Lau T, Tos M. Treatment of sinus cholesteatoma. Long-term results and recurrence rate. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114: 1428-34. [CrossRef ] Saleh HA, Mills RP. Classification and staging of cholesteatoma of middle ear surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1999; 24: 355- 9. [CrossRef ] Beutner D, Luers JC, Huttenbrink KB. Cartilage 'shoe': A new technique for stabilisation of titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis at centre of stapes footplate. J Laryngol Otol 2008; 122: 682-6