Journals / Türk Otolarengoloji Arşivi / 2006 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4

Nasal analysis among Turkish population

Türk popülasyonunda burum ölçümlerinin analizi

Pages
218–222
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We evaluated nose measurements bigger in male population and with age nose measurements getting smaller.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To analyze the nose measurements using conventional methods in 361 patients who were chosen incidentally in our policlinic.Methods: Nose measurements of the patients who admitted the policlinic in Ankara Numune Hospital between September 2003 and May 2005 were evaluated using conventional anthropologically methods.Results: Ages of the patients were between 15 and 85 years, mean 55 (± 17) years old.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Of these patients, 180 were female, 181 were male.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We evaluated nose measurements bigger in male population and with age nose measurements getting smaller.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the nose measurements using conventional methods in 361 patients who were chosen incidentally in our policlinic.Methods: Nose measurements of the patients who admitted the policlinic in Ankara Numune Hospital between September 2003 and May 2005 were evaluated using conventional anthropologically methods.Results: Ages of the patients were between 15 and 85 years, mean 55 (± 17) years old. Of these patients, 180 were female, 181 were male. Mean nose width were 3.4 ± 0.2 cm (female) and 3.7 ± 0.3 cm (male), mean nose length were 5.3 ± 0.3 cm (female) and 5.8 ± 0.4 cm (male), mean nose height were 1.9 ± 0.9 cm (female) and 2.0 ± 0.2 cm (male), mean alar-pronasale distance were 3.2 ± 0.2 cm (female) and 3.6 ± 0.2 cm (male), and mean alar-subnasale distance were 2.1 ± 0.2 cm (female) and 2.3 ± 0.2 cm (male).Conclusion: In our study we evaluate the anthropological nose structure and measurements in Turkish population. We evaluated nose measurements bigger in male population and with age nose measurements getting smaller.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı konvansiyonel ölçüm metodları kullanarak rastlantısal olarak polikliniğimize başvuran 361 hastanın burun ölçülerinin analizini yapmaktır.Yöntem: Ankara Numune Hastanesi Kulak Burun Boğaz Polikliniğine Eylül 2003-Mayıs 2005 tarihleri arasında başvuran 360 hastanın burun ölçüleri konvansiyonel antropometrik ölçüm yöntemleri kullanılarak incelendi.Bulgular: Hastaların yaş grubu en genç 15, en yaşlı 85 yaşında olmak üzere ortalama 55 (±17) olarak ölçüldü. Hastaların 180 tanesi bayan, 181 tanesi erkekti. Burun genişlikleri ortalama 3.4 ± 0.2 cm (bayan) ve 3.7 ± 0.3 cm (erkek), burun uzunluğu ortalama 5.3 ± 0.3 cm (bayan) ve 5.8 ± 0.4 cm (erkek), burun yüksekliği ortalama 1.9 ± 0.9 cm (bayan) ve 2.0 ± 0.2 cm (erkek), alar-pronazal mesafesi ortalama 3.2 ± 0.2 cm (bayan) ve 3.6 ± 0.2 cm (erkek), alar-subnazal mesafesi ortalama 2.1 ± 0.2 cm (bayan) ve 2.3 ± 0.2 cm (erkek) olarak ölçüldü.Sonuç: Çalışmamızda antropometrik olarak Türk insanının burun yapısı ve ölçüleri değerlendirilmiştir. Erkeklerde burun ölçümleri bayanlara oranla daha büyüktür ve yaşla birlikte burun ölçümlerinde genel bir azalma dikkati çekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, C., TÜNCEL, Ü., ÖZCAN, M., YEŞİLYURT, S., TEZER, M. S. (2022). Nasal analysis among Turkish population. Türk Otolarengoloji Arşivi, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4, 218–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/640015

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty: an atlas of surgical techniques. New York: Springer; 2002
  2. Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the aestetic face. New York: Thieme-Stratton; 1984. p. 13-39
  3. Mckinney P, Sweis I. A clinical definition of an ideal nasal radix. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 1416-8
  4. Byrd HS, Hobar PC. Rhinoplasty: a practical guide for surgical planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91: 642-54
  5. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WP. Dallas rhinoplasty nasal surgery by the masters. Missouri: QMP; 2002
  6. Tardy E. Essentials of septorhinoplasty. New York: Thieme; 2003. p. 71- 2
  7. Crumley RL, Lanser M. Quantitative analysis of nasal tip projection. Laryngoscope 1988; 98: 202-8
  8. Gualdi-Russo E. Longitudinal study of anthropometric changes with aging in an urban Italian population. Homo 1998; 49: 241-59
  9. Zankl A, Eberle L, Molinari L, Schinzel A. Growth charts for nose length, nasal protusion, and philtrum length from birth to 97 years. Am J Med Genet 2002; 11: 388-91
  10. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Schmitz JH. Three-dimensional study of growth and development of the nose. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997; 34: 309-17.