Journals / Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Efficacy of Bisphosphonates for the Treatment of Osteoporosis in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Multipl Sklerozlu Hastalarda Osteoporoz Tedavisinde Bifosfonatların Etkinliği

Pages
53–57
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, prospective, randomized, controlled studies are required on this issue.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bisphosphonates in osteoporotic patients with multiple sclerosis.Materials and Methods: Patients with multiple sclerosis, who were started on treatment with a diagnosis of osteoporosis, at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine Çukurova University, between January 2011 and January 2014, were included in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Response to the 12-month treatment in terms of bone mineral density (BMD) values and biological marker levels were evaluated, both within and between groups.Results: The study group consisted of 29 patients (14 controls and 15 active treatment).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, prospective, randomized, controlled studies are required on this issue.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bisphosphonates in osteoporotic patients with multiple sclerosis.Materials and Methods: Patients with multiple sclerosis, who were started on treatment with a diagnosis of osteoporosis, at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine Çukurova University, between January 2011 and January 2014, were included in this study. Patients were allocated into control (calcium-vitamin D alone) and active treatment (calcium-vitamin D and bisphosphonate) groups according to their medications. Response to the 12-month treatment in terms of bone mineral density (BMD) values and biological marker levels were evaluated, both within and between groups.Results: The study group consisted of 29 patients (14 controls and 15 active treatment). Evaluation performed within each group revealed no significant difference between baseline and post-treatment values of BMD and biological markers in controls. However, regarding the active treatment group, a significant increase in L1-L4 T-score and 25(OH)D was detected. When delta values were taken into account, comparison between groups revealed no significant difference in terms of BMD and biological marker levels.Conclusion: The effect of calcium-vitamin D alone on BMD and biologic markers was similar to that of calcium-vitamin D and bisphosphonate combination, in multiple sclerosis patients with osteoporosis. However, prospective, randomized, controlled studies are required on this issue.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı multipl sklerozlu osteoporotik hastalarda bifosfonatların etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesidir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya, Ocak 2011-Ocak 2014 tarihleri arasında, Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Kliniği'nde osteoporoz tanısı ile tedavi başlanan multipl skleroz hastaları dahil edildi. Hastalar aldıkları tedaviye göre kontrol (sadece kalsiyum-vitamin D) ve aktif tedavi (bifosfonat+ kalsiyum-vitamin D) gruplarına ayrıldı. Grupların kendi içinde ve gruplar arasında, 12 aylık tedaviye verilen kemik mineral yoğunluğu (KMY) ve biyolojik belirteç yanıtları değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Çalışma grubu 29 hastadan (14 kontrol, 15 aktif tedavi) oluşmaktaydı. Grupların kendi içinde yapılan değerlendirmede, kontrol grubunun tedavi öncesi ve sonrası, KMY ve biyolojik belirteçlere ait verilerinde anlamlı farka rastlanmadı. Aktif tedavi grubunda ise, tedavi sonrasında, L1-L4 T skorunda ve 25(OH)D düzeyinde anlamlı bir artış olduğu tespit edildi. Gruplar arası karşılaştırmada, delta değerleri göz önüne alındığında, KMY ve biyolojik belirteçler açısından, iki grup arasında anlamlı fark bulunmadı.Sonuç: Multipl sklerozlu osteoporotik hastalarda, kalsiyum-vitamin D ve bifosfonat kombinasyonunun, KMY ve biyolojik belirteçler üzerindeki etkisi, tek başına kalsiyum-D vitamini tedavisi ile benzerdir. Ancak, bu konuda yürütülecek prospektif, randomize, kontrollü çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

EVLİCE, A., DEMİRKIRAN, M., ERDEM, M., BAŞARAN, S., BENLİDAYI, İ. C. (2022). Efficacy of Bisphosphonates for the Treatment of Osteoporosis in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 53–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/639794

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Gibson JC, Summers GD. Bone health in multiple sclerosis. Osteoporos Int 2011;22:2935-49.
  2. Hearn AP, Silber E. Osteoporosis in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2010;16:1031-43.
  3. Josyula S, Mehta BK, Karmon Y, Teter B, Batista S, Ostroff J, et al. The nervous system's potential role in multiple sclerosis associated bone loss. J Neurol Sci 2012;319:8-14.
  4. Kampman MT, Eriksen EF, Holmoy T. Multiple sclerosis, a cause of secondary osteoporosis? What is the evidence and what are the clinical implications? Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 2011;191:44-9.
  5. Dobson R, Ramagopalan S, Giovannoni G. Bone health and multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2012;18:1522-8.
  6. Dobson R, Yarnall A, Noyce AJ, Giovannoni G. Bone health in chronic neurological diseases: a focus on multiple sclerosis and parkinsonian syndromes. Pract Neurol 2013;13:70-9.
  7. Ayatollahi A, Mohajeri-Tehrani MR, Nafissi S. Factors affecting bone mineral density in multiple sclerosis patients. Iran J Neurol 2013;12:19-22.
  8. Terzi T, Terzi M, Tander B, Cantürk F, Onar M. Changes in bone mineral density and bone metabolism markers in premenopausal women with multiple sclerosis and the relationship to clinical variables. J Clin Neurosci 2010;17:1260-4.
  9. Tüzün S, Altintaş A, Karacan I, Tangürek S, Saip S, Siva A. Bone status in multiple sclerosis: beyond corticosteroids. Mult Scler 2003;9:600-4.
  10. Moen SM, Celius EG, Sandvik L, Nordsletten L, Eriksen EF, Holmoy T. Low bone mass in newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome. Neurology 2011;77:151-7.
  11. Grossman JM, Gordon R, Ranganath VK, Deal C, Caplan L, Chen W, et al. American College of Rheumatology 2010 recommendations for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010;62:1515-26.
  12. Pereira RM, Carvalho JF, Paula AP, Zerbini C, Domiciano DS, Gonçalves H, et al; Committee for Osteoporosis and Bone Metabolic Disorders of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology; Brazilian Medical Association; Brazilian Association of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Rev Bras Reumatol 2012;52:580-93.
  13. Sambrook P, Birmingham J, Kelly P, Kempler S, Pocock N, Eisman J. Prevention of corticosteroid osteoporosis. A comparison of calcium, calcitriol and calcitonin. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1747-52. de Nijs RN, Jacobs JW, Algra A, Lems WF, Bijlsma JW. Prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis with active vitamin D3 analogues: a revie