Journals / Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

The Relationship of Lean Body Mass with Vitamin D Level and Physical Performance

Yağsız Vücut Kitlesinin D Vitamini Düzeyi ve Fizik Performansla İlişkisi

Pages
1–5
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to serum 25(OH)D level, group 1 was divided into three subgroups as follow; Group 1a: 25(OH)D

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, it was aimed to investigate the association between vitamin D level, physical performance and lean body mass (LBM).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A hundred female patients with 35-50 age range were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to serum 25(OH)D level, group 1 was divided into three subgroups as follow; Group 1a: 25(OH)D
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, it was aimed to investigate the association between vitamin D level, physical performance and lean body mass (LBM). Materials and Methods: A hundred female patients with 35-50 age range were included in the study. Patients’ demographic variables, height and weight measurements were recorded and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) samples were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to 25(OH)D levels; patients with low vitamin D levels (group 1) and normal vitamin D levels (group 2). Both groups’ LBM was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and physical performance was assessed by 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Results: Mean levels of 25(OH)D were found as 14.026±7.10 ng/mL in group 1 and 43.40±10.03 ng/mL in group 2. When the results of LBM were evaluated, the mean of group 1 was 35.48 (26.33-47.17) kg and the group 2 was 35.14 (29.23-53.65), and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to the mean of LBM (p=0.679). No statistically significant difference was determined in terms of 6-MWT (p=0.992). According to serum 25(OH)D level, group 1 was divided into three subgroups as follow; Group 1a: 25(OH)D

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada yağsız vücut kitlesi (YVK) ile D vitamini ve fizik performans arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amaçlandı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 35-50 yaş arası 100 kadın dahil edildi. Katılımcıların demografik bilgileri, boy ve kilo ölçümleri kaydedildi vevücut kitle indeksleri (VKİ) hesaplandı. Hastalardan alınan serum örneklerinde 25-hidroksi Vitamin D (25(OH)D) düzeyine bakıldı. 25(OH)Ddüzeyine göre 2 grup oluşturuldu: 25(OH)D düzeyi düşük olanlar (grup 1) ve normal olanlar (grup 2). Her iki grubun YVK Dual-Enerji X-RayAbsorbsiyometri ile, fizik performansları ise 6 Dakika Yürüme Testi (6-DYT) ile değerlendirildi.Bulgular: 25(OH)D ortalaması grup 1’de 14,026±7,10 ng/mL iken, grup 2’de 43,40±10,03 ng/mL olarak bulundu. YVK sonuçlarıdeğerlendirildiğinde grup 1’in ortalaması 35,48 (26,33-47,17) kg iken, grup 2’nin 35,14 (29,23-53,65) kg olarak bulundu. Gruplar arasındaYVK ortalaması açısından anlamlı fark saptanmadı (p=0,679). 6-DYT sonuçları açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptanmadı (p=0,992).Grup 1 kendi içerisinde 25(OH)D düzeyine göre 3 subgruba ayrıldı: Grup 1a: 25(OH)D

🔖

Cite This Article

EREN, E. Y., ÖZDOLAP, Ş., SARIKAYA, S. (2022). The Relationship of Lean Body Mass with Vitamin D Level and Physical Performance. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/639662

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akpınar P, Icagasioglu A. D vitamininin yaşam kalitesi ile ilişkisi. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi 2012;18:13-8
  2. Boland RL. VDR activation of intracellular signaling pathways in skeletal muscle. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2011;347:11-6
  3. Wolf O, Strom H, Milbrink J, Larsson S, Mallmin H. Differences in hip bone mineral density may explain the hip fracture pattern in osteoarthritic hips. Acta Orthop 2009;80:308-13
  4. Kassab M, Shaban I, Mohammad K, Creedy DK. Prevalence of Hypovitaminosis D Among Jordanian Healthy Infants: A Descriptive Cross Sectional Study. J Pediatr Nurs 2016;31:e119-25
  5. Pfeifer M, Begerow B, Minne HW. Vitamin D and muscle function. Osteoporos Int 2002;13:187-94
  6. Ceglia L. Vitamin D and skeletal muscle tissue and function. Mol Aspects Med 2008;29:407-14
  7. Annweiler C, Beauchet O, Berrut G, Fantino B, Bonnefoy M, Herrmann FR, et al. Is there an association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and muscle strength among older women? Results from baseline assessment of the EPIDOS study. J Nutr Health Aging 2009;13:90-5
  8. Girgis CM, Clifton-Bligh RJ, Hamrick MW, Holick MF, Gunton JE. The roles of vitamin D in skeletal muscle: form, function, and metabolism. Endocr Rev 2013;34:33-83
  9. Halfon M, Phan O, Teta D. Vitamin D: a review on its effects on muscle strength, the risk of fall, and frailty. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:953241
  10. Messina C, Monaco CG, Ulivieri FM, Sardanelli F, Sconfienza LM. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition in patients with secondary osteoporosis. Eur J Radiol 2016;85:1493-8
  11. Kullberg J, Brandberg J, Angelhed JE, Frimmel H, Bergelin E, Strid L, et al. Whole-body adipose tissue analysis: comparison of MRI, CT and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Br J Radiol 2009;82:123-30
  12. Shepherd JA, Baim S, Bilezikian JP, Schousboe JT. Executive summary of the 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference on Body Composition. J Clin Densitom 2013;16:489-95
  13. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:1911-30
  14. Basaran S, Güzel R, Benlidayı C, Uysal F. Osteoporozda Vitamin D. Düzeyinin Yaşam kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi. Osteoporoz Dünyasından 2006;12:35-8
  15. Bischoff-Ferrari HA. The 25-hydroxyvitamin D threshold for better health. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2007;103:614-9