Journals / Türk Ortodonti Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Effect of different power outputs and beam angulations on bond strength of laser etched enamel

Lazerle farklı güç ve açılarda yapılan mine pürüzlendirmesinin bağlanma dayanımına etkisi

Pages
124–133
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Laser beam angulation, at these power outputs, does not make sense All of the other pover outpusts,except 1 Watt at 900 produced similar etching patterns at both laser beam angulations.It is not extremely important to use the handpiece of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser at different angles to the enamel to etch for orthodontic purposes. (Turkish J Orthod 2009:22:124-133)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study was to test the shear bond strength and surface characteristics when applying laser beam at different angulations with different power outputs to the enamel surfaceIn the research 90 extracted human premolar teeth were uşed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Teeth were etched with Erbium, Chromium: Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium, Gannett (ErXr-YSGG) laser at three different power outputsd, 1.25 and 1.5 Watt, 140 nm, 20 Hz) and two different beam angulations^ and 90°).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Laser beam angulation, at these power outputs, does not make sense All of the other pover outpusts,except 1 Watt at 900 produced similar etching patterns at both laser beam angulations.It is not extremely important to use the handpiece of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser at different angles to the enamel to etch for orthodontic purposes. (Turkish J Orthod 2009:22:124-133)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the study was to test the shear bond strength and surface characteristics when applying laser beam at different angulations with different power outputs to the enamel surfaceIn the research 90 extracted human premolar teeth were uşed. Teeth were etched with Erbium, Chromium: Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium, Gannett (ErXr-YSGG) laser at three different power outputsd, 1.25 and 1.5 Watt, 140 nm, 20 Hz) and two different beam angulations^ and 90°). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in shear bond strengths and adhesive remnant indexes. Laser beam angulation, at these power outputs, does not make sense All of the other pover outpusts,except 1 Watt at 900 produced similar etching patterns at both laser beam angulations.It is not extremely important to use the handpiece of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser at different angles to the enamel to etch for orthodontic purposes. (Turkish J Orthod 2009:22:124-133)

Özet

Çalışmamızda farklı açılarda lazer ışınlarının, mine yüzeyine farklı güç çıkışlarıyla uyguIandığında makaslama'bağ dayanımının ölçülmesi ve yüzey özelliklerini incelemeyi amaçladık.Araştırmada 90 adet çekilmiş insan premolar dişi kullanılmıştı. Dişler Erbium, Chromium; Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium, Gamett (Er,Cr:YSGG) lazer ile 3 farklı güç çıkışı (], 1.25 ve 1.5 watt., 140 [im, 20 Hz) ve 2 farklı ışın açısında (45° ve 90°) pürüzlendirilmişti.Gruplar araşmda makaslama bağlanma kuvvetleri ve Artık Adeziv Index (ARI) açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark yoktur.(p>.05) Lazer ışın açılanması-nın, bu güç çıkışlarında bir fark oluşturmadığı gözlemledi. 1 watt 90-"lik açılandırma haricinde, tüm diğer güç çıkışları her iki lazer ışın açılanmasında benzer püruzlendirme biçimi oluşturdu. Ortodontfk amaç için pürüzlendirik rnede Er,CnYSGG lazer başlığının diş minesinde farklı açılarla kullanılmasının önemi yoktur. (Türk Ortodonti Dergisi 2009;22:124-133)

🔖

Cite This Article

DEVECİOĞLU-KAMA, J., ÖZER, T., BAŞARAN, G. (2022). Effect of different power outputs and beam angulations on bond strength of laser etched enamel. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 124–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/639493

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Mizrahi E. Enamel demineralization following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1982; 82:62-67
  2. Chang HS, Walsh LJ, Freer TJ. Enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment Aetiology and prevention. Aust Dent J 1997; 42:322-327
  3. Underwood ML, Rawls HR, Zimmerman BF. Clinical evaluation of a fluoride-exchanging resin as an orthodontic adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:93-99
  4. Fox NA. Fluoride release from orthodontic bonding materials in vitro study, Br J Orthod 1990;17:293-298
  5. Gillgrass TJ, Creanor SL, Foye RH, Millet DT. Varnish or polymeric coating for the prevention of demineralization? An ex vivo study, J Orthod 2001;28:291-295
  6. Noel L, Rebeliato J, Sheats RD. The effect of argon laser irradiation on demineralization resistance of human enamel adjacent to orthodontic brackets: An in vitro study. Angle Orthod 2003;73:249-258
  7. Kim JH, Kwon OW, Kim HI, Kwon YH. Acid resistance of Erbium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser-treated and phosphoric acid-etched enamels. Angle Orthod 2006;76:1052- 1056. 8. von Fraunhofer JA, Allen. DJ, Orbell GM. Laser etching of enamel for direct bonding. Angle orthod 1993;63:73-76
  8. Lee BS, Hsieh TT, Lee YL, Lan WH, Hsu YJ, Wen PH, Lin CP. Bond strengths of orthodontic bracket after acid-etched, Er:YAG laser-irradiated and combined treatment on enamel surface Angle Orthod 2003;73:565-70
  9. Sung EC, Chenard T, Caputo AA, Amodoe M, Chung EM, Rizoiu IM. Composite resin bond strength to primary dentin prepared with Er,Cr:YSGG laser. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005;30:45-50. 11. de Carvalhoa RCR, de Freitasb PM, Otsukic M, Eduardod CP, Tagamie J. Influence of Er:YAG laser beam angle, working distance and energy density on dentin morphology: A SEM investigation. JOLA 2005;5:237-243
  10. Başaran G, Özer T, Berk N, Hamamci O. Etching enamel for orthodontic purposes with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser system. Angle Orthod 2007;77:117-123
  11. Maiman TH. Stimulated optical radiation in ruby. Nature 1960;187:493-494
  12. Fisher SE, Frame JW. The effects of the carbon dioxide surgical laser on oral tissues Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984;22:414
  13. Pick RM, Pecaro BC, Silberman CJ. The laser gingivectomy: the use of the C02 laser for the removal of phenytoin hyperplasia. J Periodontal 1985;56:492-496
  14. White JM, Goodis HE, Rose CL. Use of the pulsed Nd:YAG laser for intraoral soft tissue surgery. Lasers Surg Med 1991;11:455-461
  15. Romanos GE, Nentwig GH, Present and future of lasers in oral soft tissue s