Journals / Türk Ortodonti Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of soft tissue adaptation during retention period

Pekiştirme döneminde yumuşak doku adaptasyonunun incelenmesi

Pages
110–123
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal and dental stability and the adaptation o f tongue and perioral soft tissue during retention treatment period.The sample included 22 Angle class I and/or class If skeletal class I (15 females, 7 males, mean chronologic age 17.5 6± 1.2) cases who had 4 premolar extracted. 18 measurements on lateral cephalometric and anteroposterior films, 4 measurements on dental casts, 16 measurements of the soft tissue were carried out at the end of active orthodontic treatment (TO), at the sixth (T1) and the ninth months (T2) of retention treatment period and evaluated statistically using 'Wilcoxon test'.U6s(V) measurement showed a significant increase during T0-TI (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal and dental stability and the adaptation o f tongue and perioral soft tissue during retention treatment period.The sample included 22 Angle class I and/or class If skeletal class I (15 females, 7 males, mean chronologic age 17.5 6± 1.2) cases who had 4 premolar extracted. 18 measurements on lateral cephalometric and anteroposterior films, 4 measurements on dental casts, 16 measurements of the soft tissue were carried out at the end of active orthodontic treatment (TO), at the sixth (T1) and the ninth months (T2) of retention treatment period and evaluated statistically using 'Wilcoxon test'.U6s(V) measurement showed a significant increase during T0-TI (p
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal and dental stability and the adaptation o f tongue and perioral soft tissue during retention treatment period.The sample included 22 Angle class I and/or class If skeletal class I (15 females, 7 males, mean chronologic age 17.5 6± 1.2) cases who had 4 premolar extracted. 18 measurements on lateral cephalometric and anteroposterior films, 4 measurements on dental casts, 16 measurements of the soft tissue were carried out at the end of active orthodontic treatment (TO), at the sixth (T1) and the ninth months (T2) of retention treatment period and evaluated statistically using 'Wilcoxon test'.U6s(V) measurement showed a significant increase during T0-TI (p
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal and dental stability and the adaptation o f tongue and perioral soft tissue during retention treatment period.The sample included 22 Angle class I and/or class If skeletal class I (15 females, 7 males, mean chronologic age 17.5 6± 1.2) cases who had 4 premolar extracted. 18 measurements on lateral cephalometric and anteroposterior films, 4 measurements on dental casts, 16 measurements of the soft tissue were carried out at the end of active orthodontic treatment (TO), at the sixth (T1) and the ninth months (T2) of retention treatment period and evaluated statistically using 'Wilcoxon test'.U6s(V) measurement showed a significant increase during T0-TI (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal and dental stability and the adaptation o f tongue and perioral soft tissue during retention treatment period.The sample included 22 Angle class I and/or class If skeletal class I (15 females, 7 males, mean chronologic age 17.5 6± 1.2) cases who had 4 premolar extracted. 18 measurements on lateral cephalometric and anteroposterior films, 4 measurements on dental casts, 16 measurements of the soft tissue were carried out at the end of active orthodontic treatment (TO), at the sixth (T1) and the ninth months (T2) of retention treatment period and evaluated statistically using 'Wilcoxon test'.U6s(V) measurement showed a significant increase during T0-TI (p

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, pekiştirme tedavisi döneminde iskeletsel ve dişsel stabiliteyi, dil ve perioral yumuşak dokuların adaptasyonunu incelemektir.Angle sınıf I ve/veya sınıf II kapanış ilişkisi gösteren, iskeletsel sınıf 1, dört adet birinci küçük azı diş çekimlerinin yapıldığı toplam 22 birey (15 kız 7 erkek, kronolojik yaş ortalaması 1 7.56±! .2) araştırma kapsamına alındı. Aktif ortodonti k tedavi sonunda (TO), pekiştirme tedavisinin 6.(T 1) ve 9.(T2) aylarında alınan lateral sefalometrik ve anteroposterior radyografiler üzerinde 18, ortodontik modeller üzerinde 4 ölçüm ve yumuşak dokuların dişler üzerindeki baskılarını veren 16 adet ölçüm yapıldı; ölçümler 'Wilcoxon testi' ite istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi.U6s(V) Ölçümü T0-T1 (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DARENDELİLER, N., DİNÇER, M., IŞIK-ASLAN, B., ÜNSAL-RAŞİT, B. (2022). Evaluation of soft tissue adaptation during retention period. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 110–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/639470

References (20)

  1. Binder RE. Retention and post-treatment stability in the adult dentition. Dent Clin North Am 1988; 32: 621-41
  2. Edwards JG. A Surgical procedure to eliminate rotational relapse. Am J Orthod 1970; 57: 35-46
  3. Strange RH. Highlights of sixty-four years in practice. Angle Orthod 1974; 44: 101-12
  4. Proffit WR. Muscle pressures and tooth position: North American whites and Australian aborigines. Angle Orthod 1975; 45: 1-11
  5. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. St. Louis, CV Mosby Company, 2007
  6. Proffit WR: Equilibrium theory revisited factors influencing position of the teeth. Angle Orthod 1978; 48: 175-86
  7. Weinstein S. Minimal forces in tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1967;53: 881-903
  8. Graber TM, Swain BF. Orthodontics Current Principles and Techniques. St. Louis, CV Mosby Company, 1985
  9. Nanda RS, Nanda SK. Considerations of dentofacial growth in long-term retention and stability: Is active retention needed? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 101: 297-302
  10. Uzel I, Enacar A. Ortodontide Sefalometri. Adana, Çukurova University Printing House, 2000
  11. Lindner A, Hellsing E. Cheek and lip pressure against maxillary dental arch during dummy sucking. Eur J Orthod 1991; 13: 362-66
  12. Fröhlich K, Ingervall B, Thüer U. Further studies of the pressure from the tongue on the teeth in young adults. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 229-39
  13. Gould MSE, Picton DCA. A Study of pressures exerted by the lips and cheeks on the teeth of subjects with Angle's Class II division 1, Class II division 2 and Class III malocclusions compared with those of subjects with normal occlusions. Archs Oral Biol 1968;13:527-41
  14. Soo ND, Moore RN. A technique for measurement of intraoral lip pressures with lip bumper therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99:409-17
  15. Ingervall B, Thüer U. Cheek pressure and head posture. Angle Orthod 1988; 58: 47-57
  16. Winer B J, Brown D R, Michels K M. Statistical principles experimental design. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1991
  17. Sadowsky C, Sakols El. Long term assessment of othodontic relapse. Am J Orthod 1982; 82:456-63
  18. Little RM: Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: University of Washington studies. Semin Orthod 1999; 5:191-204
  19. Erdinç AE,Nanda RS, Işiksal E: Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 775-84
  20. Lapatki BG, Baustert D, Schulte-Mönting J, Frucht S, Jonas IE. Li