Journals / Türk Ortodonti Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of experimental resistance to sliding between different orthodontic arch wires in gold and stainless steel brackets with second-order angulations

Altın braketlerde ortodontik tellerin farklı açılarda meydana getirdiği deneysel sürtünme değerlerinin çelik braketlerle karşılaştırılması

Pages
136–150
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Statistical analyses showed that the primary effects of all three factors that is namely bracket, wire material and angle were found significant in P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this study was to test in vitro two types of golden brackets (Forever Cold 24K and Forever Cold) and one conventional stainless steel bracket (Mini Master) as control for sliding resistance in combination with nickel-titanium (NiTi) and stainless steel (SS) arch wires in four second-order angulations with respect to factional force values.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Arch wires were pulled through the slots with a crosshead speed of 7 mm/minute.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Statistical analyses showed that the primary effects of all three factors that is namely bracket, wire material and angle were found significant in P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to test in vitro two types of golden brackets (Forever Cold 24K and Forever Cold) and one conventional stainless steel bracket (Mini Master) as control for sliding resistance in combination with nickel-titanium (NiTi) and stainless steel (SS) arch wires in four second-order angulations with respect to factional force values. Materials and Methods: Since there are many factors affecting friction, all tests were performed in a dry environment without ligaturing using an electronic angulations unit and a universal test device. Arch wires were pulled through the slots with a crosshead speed of 7 mm/minute. Results: Statistical analyses showed that the primary effects of all three factors that is namely bracket, wire material and angle were found significant in P

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, iki farklı tipteki altın braketini (Forever Gold 24l< ve Forever Gold) konvansiyonel çelik bir braket (Mini Master) ile nikel-titanyum (NiTî) ve paslanmaz çelik (SS) ark teli kombinasyonlarında, dört farklı ikinci düzen açılandırmasında, sürtünme dirençleri bakımından in vitro olarak karşılaştırmaktır. Gereçler ve Yöntem: Sürtünmeyi etkileyen birçok faktör olduğundan, testler kum ortamda ve tek düzlem üzerinde, ligatürleme yapılmadan, elektronik bir açılandırma ünitesi ve Universal bir test. cihazı kullanılarak gerçekleştirildi. Çekme hızı 1 mm/dakika olarak tanımlandı. Bulgular: İstatistiksel değerlendirmelerde P

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNÇAĞ, G., IŞIKSAL, E., BULUT, H. (2022). Comparison of experimental resistance to sliding between different orthodontic arch wires in gold and stainless steel brackets with second-order angulations. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 136–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/639467

References (17)

  1. Proffit WR, Fields WH. Contemporary Orthodontics. The C.V Mosby Company, St.Louis-Toronto-London, 1986
  2. Tidy DC. Frictional forces in fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 96:249-54,1989
  3. Articolo LC, Kusy RR Influence of angulation on the resistance to sliding in fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 115:39-51,1999
  4. Proffit WR, Fields HW Contemporary orthodontics. Mosby Year Book Inc., St. Louis, 2000
  5. Yamaguchi K, Nanda RS, Morimoto N, Oda Y A study of force application, amount of retarding force, and bracket width in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 109:50-6,1996
  6. Frank CA, Nikolai RJ. A Comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and archwire. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 78:593-609,1980
  7. Kapila S, Angolkar Py Duncanson MD Jr, Nanda RS. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 98:117-26,1990
  8. Garner LD, Allai WW, Moore BK. A comparison of frictional forces during simulated canine retraction of a continuous edgewise archwire. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 90:199-203,1986
  9. Kusy RF? Whitley JQ. Coefficients of friction for archwires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. I. The dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 98:300-12,1990
  10. Baker KL, Nieberg LG, Welmer AD, Hanna M. Frictional changes in force values caused by saliva substitution. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 91:316-20,1987
  11. Huffman DJ, Way DC. A clinical evaluation of tooth movement along archwires of two different sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 83:453-9,1983
  12. Berger JL. The influence of the SPEED bracket's self-ligating design on force levels in tooth movement: a comparative in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 97:219-28,1990
  13. Ireland AJ,Sherriff M, McDonald E Effect of bracket and wire composition on frictional forces. Eur J Orthod 13:322-8, 1991
  14. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ, Mayhew MJ, Buckthal JE. Surface roughness of orthodontic archwires via laser spectroscopy. Angle Orthod 58:33-45,1988
  15. Drescher D, Bourauel C, Schumacher HA. Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 96:397-404,1989
  16. Burstone CJ, Frazin-Nia E Production of low-friction and colored TMA by ion Implantation. J Clin Orthod 29:453-61,1998
  17. Vaughan JL, Duncanson Jr MG, Nanda RS, Currier GE Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and o