Journals / Türk Ortodonti Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

A nonsurgical approach for treatment of high-angle class II malocclusion

Dik yönü artmış sınıf II maloklüzyonlu vakaya cerrahi olmayan ortodontik tedavi yaklaşım

Pages
61–70
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This case report shows an individualized treat¬ment approach to a patient with high angle Class II malocclusion. (Turkish J Orthod 2010;23:61-70)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The bite opening effects of orthodontic appliances often cause a downward and backward mandibular rotation that only exacerbates the malocclusion.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Successful orthodontic treatment of a high angle, Class II, Division 1 malocclusion requires careful consideration of the vertical di¬mension during treatment planning.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This case report shows an individualized treat¬ment approach to a patient with high angle Class II malocclusion. (Turkish J Orthod 2010;23:61-70)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The bite opening effects of orthodontic appliances often cause a downward and backward mandibular rotation that only exacerbates the malocclusion. Successful orthodontic treatment of a high angle, Class II, Division 1 malocclusion requires careful consideration of the vertical di¬mension during treatment planning. This case report shows an individualized treat¬ment approach to a patient with high angle Class II malocclusion. (Turkish J Orthod 2010;23:61-70)

Özet

Ortodontik apareyleri n bite açıcı etkileri sıklıkla mandibulanın aşağı ve geri rotasyonuna neden olarak maloklüzyonu daha da kötüleştirmektedir. Dik yön açısı artmış Sınıf II Bölüm 1 maloklüzyonlu hastanın başarılı ortodontik tedavisi için tedavi planlaması sırasında vertikal boyutun dikkatlice değerlendirilmesi gerekir. Bu vaka raporu büyümekte olan dik yön açısı artmış şiddetli Sınıf II maloklüzyona sahip bir hastaya tedavi yaklaşımını gös¬termektedir. (Türk Ortodonti Dergisi 2010;23:61-70)

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZEL, N., AKSOY-DOĞAN, A., KARAHANOĞLU, S. (2022). A nonsurgical approach for treatment of high-angle class II malocclusion. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 61–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/639451

References (2)

  1. Collins MK. A nonsurgical approach to treatment of high angle class II, division 1 malocclusion in a nongrowing patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:678-861. 2.Cope JB, Sachdeva RCL. Nonsurgical correction of a class II malocclusion with a vertical growth tendency. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:66-74. 3.Maggioncalda EA. Treatment of a class II, division 1 vertical growth pattern severe anterior crowding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:300-308. 4.Brown P. A cephalometric evaluation of high-pull molar headgear and face-bow neck strap therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1978;74:621-632. 5.Burke M, Jacobson A. Vertical changes in high angle class II, division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital pull headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:501-508. 6.Cangialosi TJ, Meistrell ME, Leung MA, Ko JY. A cephalometric appraisal of edgewise class II nonextraction treatment with extraoral force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:315-324. 7.Firouz M, Zernik J, Nanda R. Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:197-205. 8.Giancotti A. Nonextraction treatment of a high angle class II malocclusion: a case report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;11 7:721-727. 9.Lima Filho RM, Lima-AL, de Oliveira Ruellas AC. Longitudinal study of anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal class II patients treated with Kloehn cervical headgear. Angle Orthod 2003;73:187-193. 10.O'Reilly MT, Nanda SK, Close J. Cervical and oblique headgear: a comparison of treatment effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:504-509. 11.FranchiL, Baccetti T, Defraia E, Geri C. Significato del complesso cefalometrico del "pilastro postero superiore" del complesso facciale nello studio dell'equilibrio verticale. Nota II. Indagine clinico-statistica su una casistica ortodontica. Paper presented at: Atti del XII Congresso Nazionale SIDO; 1993;
  2. Cernobbio, Italy. 12.CozzaP, Mucedero M, Baccetti T, Franchi L. Early orthodontic treatment of skeletal open-bite malocclusion: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2005;75:707-713. 13.Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini G. Upper molar distalization: a critical analysis. Orthod Craniofacial Res 2002;5:114-126. 14.Bjork A, Skieller V. Roentgencephalometric growth analysis of the maxilla. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1977;53:51-55. 15.Bjork A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible.