Journals / Türk Nöroşirürji Dergsi / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

The Place of Dynamic and Semidynamic Systems in Degenerative Lumbar Spine

Lomber Dejeneratif Omurgada Dinamik ve Yarı Dinamik Sistemin Yeri

Pages
244–247
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

More research and more advanced systems are needed for this purpose.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Degenerative disc disease is one of the most important causes of back pain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Posterior dynamic stabilization in surgical treatment of degenerative instability is the preferred surgical method and the mortality and morbidity rates are low.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:More research and more advanced systems are needed for this purpose.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Degenerative disc disease is one of the most important causes of back pain. Pathological movements in the deformed moving segment cause pain. For this reason, the destruction of the motion of the segment also eliminates the pain. Degenerative unstable primary treatment options are fusion, dynamic stabilization and lumbar arthroplasty. Posterior dynamic stabilization in surgical treatment of degenerative instability is the preferred surgical method and the mortality and morbidity rates are low. Dynesys is the most widely used dynamic system in the world today. When applying dynamic systems, dynamic or semi-dynamic stabilization systems that best mimic the appropriate movement of the spine should be preferred. More research and more advanced systems are needed for this purpose.

Özet

Dejeneratif disk hastalığı bel ağrısının en önemli sebeplerinden biri olarak gösterilmektedir. Dejenere olan hareketli segmentte meydana gelen patolojik hareketler ağrıya neden olmaktadır. Bu nedenle, segmentin hareketinin yok edilmesi ağrıyı da yok etmektedir. Dejeneratif instabil omurgada başlıca tedavi seçeneklerini; füzyon, dinamik stabilizasyon ve lomber artroplasti oluşturmaktadır. Dejeneratif instabilitenin cerrahi tedavisinde posterior dinamik stabilizasyon, ilk tercih edilmesi gereken cerrahi yöntem olup, mortalite ve morbidite oranı düşüktür. Dynesys, günümüzde dünya genelinde en çok kullanılan dinamik sistemdir. Dinamik sistemler uygulanırken omurganın yaşına uygun hareketini en iyi taklit eden dinamik veya yarı dinamik stabilizasyon sistemleri tercih edilmelidir. Bu amaç için daha çok çalışma ve daha çok gelişmiş sisteme ihtiyaç vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYIN, M., CİNGÖZ, İ. D., DALBAYRAK, S. (2022). The Place of Dynamic and Semidynamic Systems in Degenerative Lumbar Spine. Türk Nöroşirürji Dergsi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 244–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/637378

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Bordes-Monmeneu M, Bordes-Garcia V, Rodrigo-Baeza F, Saéz D: System of dynamic neutralization in the lumbar spine: Experience on 94 cases. Neurocirugia (Astur) 16:499-506, 2005 2. Bozkus H, Senoglu M, Baek S, Sawa AGU, Ozer AF, Sonntag VKH, Crawford NR: Dynamic lumbar pedicle screw-rod stabilization: In vitro biomechanical comparison with standars rigid pedicle screw-rod stabilization. J Neurosurg Spine 12: 183- 189, 2010 3. Cheng BC, Gordon J, Cheng J, Welch WC: Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion. Spine 32: 2551-2557, 2007 4. De Iure F, Bosco G, Cappuccio M, Paderni S, Amendola L: Posterior lumbar fusion by peek rods in degenerative spine: Preliminary report on 30 cases. Eur Spine J 21 Suppl 1: 50-54, 2012 5. Di Silvestre M, Lolli F, Bakaloudis G, Parisini P: Dynamic stabilization for degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients. Spine 35(2):227-234, 2010 6. Freynhagen R, Baron R: The evaluation of neuropathic components in low back pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 13(3): 185-190, 2009 7. Graf H: Lumbar instability: Surgical treatment without fusion. Rachis 412: 123-137, 1992 8. Grevitt MP, Gardner AD, Spilsbury J, Shackleford IM, Baskerville R, Pursell LM, Hassaan A, Mulholland RC: The Graf stabilisation system: Early results in 50 patients. Eur Spine J 4: 169-175, 1995 9. Kanayama M, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, Harada M, Oha F, Ohkoshi Y, Tada H, Yamamoto K, Yamane S: Adjacent-segment morbidity after Graf ligamentoplasty compared with posterolateral lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg 95 Suppl 1: 5-10, 2001 10. Kaner T, Dalbayrak S, Oktenoglu T, Sasani M, Aydin AL, Ozer AF: Comparison of posterior dynamic and posterior rigid transpedicular stabilization with fusion to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis. Orthopedics 33(5):309, 2010 11. Kaner T, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Aydin AL, Ozer AF: Clinical outcomes of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated with lumbar decompression and the Cosmic "semi rigid" posterior system. SAS Journal 4(4):99-106, 2010 12. Kaner T, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Cosar M, Ozer AF: Utilizing dynamic rods with dynamic screws in the surgical treatment of chronic instability: A prospective clinical study. Turk Neurosurg 19(4):319-326, 2009 13. Kaner T, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Ozer AF: Dynamic stabilization of the spine: A new classification system. Turk Neurosurg 20(2): 205-215, 2010 14. Kawakami M, Hashizume H, Nishi H, Matsumoto T, Tamaki T, Kuribayashi K: Comparison of n