SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Nöroloji Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Examination in Central Nervous System Tumor Surgery: Four-year Single-institution Experience

Merkezi Sinir Sistemi Kitle Cerrahisi Ameliyatlarında İntraoperatif Nörofizyolojik İnceleme: Dört Yıllık Tek Hastane Tecrübesi

Melike MUT
F. İrsel TEZER
F. Gökçem YILDIZ
Kubilay VARLI
Pages
112–116
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Multimodal IONM is a valuable tool for optimization of outcomes in complex central nervous system surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) is widely used nowadays to minimize neurologic morbidity in neurosurgical operations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Twenty-eight patients who underwent central nervous system tumor surgery between 2012 and 2016 received IONM.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Multimodal IONM is a valuable tool for optimization of outcomes in complex central nervous system surgery.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) is widely used nowadays to minimize neurologic morbidity in neurosurgical operations. Our goal was to describe the standard IONM techniques used in our center and to discuss our own clinical experience with a multimodality approach.Materials and Methods: All consecutive adult patients consulted for neurosurgical operations who underwent at least one modality of IONM (brainstemevoked potential, motor-evoked potential, somatosensory-evoked potential, and/or electromyography) were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Twenty-eight patients who underwent central nervous system tumor surgery between 2012 and 2016 received IONM. IONM minimizes the neurologic morbidity of surgery and allows identification and differentiation of functional neural tissues. Conclusion: Multimodal IONM is a valuable tool for optimization of outcomes in complex central nervous system surgery.

Özet

Amaç: İntraoperatif nörofizyolojik monitörizasyon (İONM), beyin cerrahisi operasyonlarında nörolojik kaybı en aza indirmek için günümüzde oldukça yaygın şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Amacımız, merkezimizde kullanılan standart İONM tekniklerini tanımlamak ve çoklu modalite yaklaşımına sahip kendi klinik tecrübemizi tartışmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Tüm beyin cerrahisi operasyonları için danışılan ve en az bir modaliteli İONM (beyin sapı uyarılmış potansiyel, motor uyarılmış potansiyel, somatosensoriyel uyarılmış potansiyel ve/veya elektromiyografi) yapılan erişkin hastalar geriye dönük olarak gözden geçirildi. Bulgular: 2012-2016 yılları arasında merkezi sinir sistemi kitle cerrahisi olan 28 hastaya İONM uygulandı. İONM cerrahinin nörolojik morbiditesini en aza indirgemektedir ve fonksiyonel nöral dokuların tanınması ve ayrımını sağlamaktadır. Sonuç: Çoklu modaliteli İONM karmaşık merkezi sinir sistemi cerrahisinde sonucun en iyi şekilde olmasını sağlayan değerli bir araçtır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUT, M., TEZER, F. İ., YILDIZ, F. G., VARLI, K. (2022). Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Examination in Central Nervous System Tumor Surgery: Four-year Single-institution Experience. Türk Nöroloji Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 112–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/636873

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Deletis V, Sala F. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cordduring spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119:248-264
  2. Nuwer MR. Overview and history. In: Daube JR, Mauguière F, Nuwer MR (eds). Handbook of clinical neurophysiology, intraoperative monitoring of neural function New York, NY: Elsevier, 2008:2-6
  3. Sala F, Palandri G, Basso E, Lanteri P, Deletis V, Faccioli F, Bricolo A. Motor evoked potential monitoring improves outcome after surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a historical control study. Neurosurgery 2006;58:1129-1143
  4. Sala F, Dvorak J, Faccioli F. Cost effectiveness of multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgery. Eur Spine J 2007;16:229-231
  5. Deletis V. Intraoperative monitoring of the functional integrity of thr motor pathways, in Devinsky O, beric A, Dogali M (eds). Electrical and Magnetic stimulation of the Brain and spinal cord. New York: Raven Press, 1993:201- 214
  6. Kothbauer K, Deletis V, Epstein FJ. Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring for intramedullary surgery: an essential adjuct. Pediatr Neurosurg 1997;26:247- 254
  7. Sala F, Lanteri P, Bricolo A. Motor evoked potential monitoring for spinal cord and brain stem surgery. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2004;29:133-169
  8. Kelleher MO, Tan G, Sarjeant R, Fehlings MG. Predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during cervical spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1055 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2008;8:215-221
  9. Eager M, Shimer A, Jahangiri FR, Shen F, Arlet V. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM): lessons learned from 32 case events in 2069 spine cases. Am J Electroneurodiagn Technol 2009;51:247-263
  10. Hilibrand AS, Schwartz DM, Sethuraman V, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ. Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1248-1253
  11. Khan MH, Smith PN, Balzer JR, Crammond D, Welch WC, Gerszten P, Sclabassi RJ, Kang JD, Donaldson WF. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine corpectomy surgery: experience with 508 cases. Spine 2006;31:105-113
  12. Quraishi NA, Lewis SJ, Kelleher MO, Sarjeant R, Rampersaud YR, Fehlings MG. Intraoperative multimodality monitoring in adult spinal deformity: analysis of a prospective series of one hundred two cases with independent evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa