Journals / Türk Nefroloji Diyaliz ve Transplantasyon Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of the early complications of two different catheter implantation techniques

İki farklı periton diyaliz kateter yerleştirme tekniğinin erken dönem komplikasyonlarının karşılaştırılması

Pages
23–28
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although exit site leakage was not statistically significant in both methods (p:0.119), exit site bleeding was significantly increased in the Seldinger method (p:0.049).CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, the Seldinger method should be tried first for peritoneal catheter implantation, and surgical technique be reserved only for unsuccessful Seldinger procedures .

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There is no consensus on the selection of peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation techniques, and whether to choose surgery or the percutaneous method, because of the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the early complications of catheter implantation both with the Seldinger and surgical techniques to compare the two techniques forMATERIAL and METHOD: Two hundred twenty-six peritoneal catheters implanted to 209 end stage renal disease patients (110 F, mean age 42.5±15.9 years), were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although exit site leakage was not statistically significant in both methods (p:0.119), exit site bleeding was significantly increased in the Seldinger method (p:0.049).CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, the Seldinger method should be tried first for peritoneal catheter implantation, and surgical technique be reserved only for unsuccessful Seldinger procedures .
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There is no consensus on the selection of peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation techniques, and whether to choose surgery or the percutaneous method, because of the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the early complications of catheter implantation both with the Seldinger and surgical techniques to compare the two techniques forMATERIAL and METHOD: Two hundred twenty-six peritoneal catheters implanted to 209 end stage renal disease patients (110 F, mean age 42.5±15.9 years), were evaluated. One hundred eighty-one (80%) of the 226 catheters were implanted percutaneously by the same nephrologist using the Seldinger method and 45 (20%) catheters were implanted surgically. Patients were evaluated according to early (during the first month after implantation) complications.RESULTS: Early complications were observed in 78 (35.8%) (55 Seldinger method) of 226 PD catheter implantation procedures. Early complications were less frequent with Seldinger method (p:0.015). Rates with the Seldinger method were as follows: Exit site leakage 3.4%, exit site infection 2.3%, exit site bleeding 8%, malposition 6.8%, poor drainage 3.4% and peritonitis 6.8%.. The rates for the surgical methods were as follows: exit site leakage 8.9%, exit site infection 8.9%, malposition %20, poor drainage %24.4 and peritonitis %6.7. Exit site infection, malposition and poor drainage were significantly higher in the surgical method (p:0.036, 0.008, 0.001 respectively). Although exit site leakage was not statistically significant in both methods (p:0.119), exit site bleeding was significantly increased in the Seldinger method (p:0.049).CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, the Seldinger method should be tried first for peritoneal catheter implantation, and surgical technique be reserved only for unsuccessful Seldinger procedures .

Özet

AMAÇ: Periton diyaliz (PD) kateter yerleştirme teknikleri içinde gerek cerrahi ve gerekse de perkütan tekniklerin avantaj ve dezavantajlarının olması nedeniyle hangi yöntemin tercih edilmesi gerektiği konusunda tam bir görüş birliği bulunmamaktadır. Ünitemizde iki farklı teknikle kateter takılan hastalarda gelişen komplikasyonların geriye dönük olarak değerlendirilmesi ve hangi yöntemin öncelikli tercih edilmesi konusunda fikir sahibi olunması amaçlandı.GEREÇ ve YÖNTEM: PD ünitemizde son dönem böbrek yetmezliği tanısı konulan 110'u bayan, yaş ortalaması 42,5±15,9 yıl olan 209 hastaya takılan 226 PD kateteri değerlendirildi. Kateter implantasyonunun 181'i (%80) Seldinger yöntemi ile 45'i (%20) açık cerrahi yöntemle gerçekleştirildi. İşlem sonrası erken dönem (ilk bir ay içinde oluşan) komplikasyonlar tarandı.BULGULAR: İki yüz yirmi altı kateterin 55'i Seldinger yöntemle ve 23'ü açık cerrahi yöntemle olmak üzere 78'inde (%35,8) erken dönem komplikasyonu gelişti. Seldinger yöntemiyle takılan kateterlerde erken dönemde gelişen komplikasyonlar açık cerrahi yöntemle takılanlara göre anlamlı olarak daha az oranda görüldü (p:0,015). Seldinger yönteminde sızıntı %3,4, çıkış yeri enfeksiyonu %2,3, çıkış yerinde hemoraji %8, malpozisyon %6,8, drenaj bozukluğu %3,4 ve peritonit %6,9 oranında saptandı. Cerrahi yöntemde ise sızıntı %8,9, çıkış yeri enfeksiyonu %8,9, malpozisyon %20, drenaj bozukluğu %24,4 ve peritonit %6,7 oranında saptandı. Çıkış yeri enfeksiyonu, malpozisyon ve drenaj bozukluğu cerrahi yöntemde anlamlı olarak daha fazla saptandı (p:0,036, 0,008, 0,001, sırasıyla). Sızıntı komplikasyonu açısından iki yöntem arasında anlamlı farklılık olmamasına (p:0,119) karşılık çıkış yeri hemorajisi Seldinger yönteminde anlamlı olarak daha yüksek oranda saptandı (p:0,049).SONUÇ: PD kateteri takılması için öncelikle Seldinger yöntemi denenmelidir. Ancak sorunlu hastalarda ve Seldinger yöntemi ile kateter takılamayan hastalarda cerrahi teknikle kateter takılması uygun olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇ, Y., SAKACI, T., YILMAZ, M., ÜNSAL, A., BAŞTÜRK, T., AHBAP, E., YILDIRIM, M., ULUDAĞ, M., YETKİN, G. (2022). Comparison of the early complications of two different catheter implantation techniques. Türk Nefroloji Diyaliz ve Transplantasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 23–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/636475

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ogunc G: Minilaparoscopic extraperitoneal tunneling with omentopexy: A new technique for CAPD catheter placement. Perit Dial Int 2005
  2. 555 2. Zaman F, Pervez A, Atray NK, Murphy S, Work J, Abreo KD: Fluoroscopy-assisted placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters by nephrologists. Semin Dial 2005
  3. 245 3. Comert M, Borazan A, Kulah E, Uηan BH: A new laparoscopic technique for the placement of a permanent peritoneal dialysis catheter: The preperitoneal tunneling method. Surg Endosc 2005
  4. 248 4. Jo YI, Shin SK, Lee JH, Song JO, Park JH: Immediate initiation of CAPD following percutaneous catheter placement without breakin procedure. Perit Dial Int 2007
  5. 183 5. Tarhan ÖR, Eroğlu E, Sezer T, Barut İ, Çerçi C, Akdeniz Y, Bülbül M: Complication of tenckhoff catheter insertion via rectus musclesplitting technique: Six year experience and review of the literature. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2007
  6. 51 6. Borazan A Comert M, Ucan BH, Comert FB, Sert M, Sekitmez N, Cesur A: The comparison in terms of early complications of a new technique and percutaneous method for the placement of CAPD catheters. Renal Failure 2006
  7. 28(1): 37-42 7. Piraino B, Bailie GR, Bernardini J, Boeschoten E, Gupta A, Holmes C, Kuijper EJ, Li PK, Lye WC, Mujais S, Paterson DL, Fontan MP, Ramos A, Schaefer F: Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2005 update. Perit Dial Int 2005
  8. 25(2): 107-131 8. Leblanc M, Ouimet D, Pichette V: Dialysate leaks in peritoneal dialysis. Semin Dial 2001
  9. 14(1): 50-54 9. Moreiras Plaza M, Cuina L, Goyanes GR, Sobrado JA, Gonzalez L: Mechanical complications in chronic peritoneal dialysis. Clin Nephrol 1999
  10. 130 10. Allon M, Soucie JM, Macon EJ: Complications with permanent peritoneal dialysis catheters: Experience with 154 percutaneously placed catheters. Nephron 1988
  11. 11 11. Sampathkumar K, Mahaldar AR, Sooraj YS, Ramkrishnan M, Ajeshkumar, Ravichandran R: Percutaneous CAPD catheter insertion by a nephrologist versus surgical placement: A comparative study. Indian J Nephrol 2008
  12. 8 12. Smith SA, Morgan SH, Eastwood JB: Routine percutaneous insertion of permanent peritoneal dialysis catheters on the nephrology ward. Perit Dial Int 1994
  13. 286 13. Swartz R, Messana J, Rocher L, Reynolds J, Starmann B, Lees P: The curled catheter: Dependable device for percutaneous peritoneal access. Perit Dial Int 1990
  14. 235 14. Banli O, Altun H, Oztemel A: Early start of CAPD with the Seldinger technique