Journals / Türk Nefroloji Diyaliz ve Transplantasyon Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Renal replasman tedavisi alan hastaların hastaneye yatış ve sağkalım açısından karşılaştırılması

Comparison of hospitalization and survival between patients treated with renal replacement therapy

Pages
72–76
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Survival rates in the RT group were better than that of the HD and PD groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) prolongs survival in patients with end-stage-renal-disease (ESRD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:We compared patient survival, number and duration of hospitalization in patients treated with RRT in this study.MATERIAL and METHODS: Two hundred and eighty seven patients (87 hemodialysis (HD), 97 peritoneal dialysis (PD), 103 renal transplant (RT) patients) were enrolled in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Survival rates in the RT group were better than that of the HD and PD groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

AIM: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) prolongs survival in patients with end-stage-renal-disease (ESRD). We compared patient survival, number and duration of hospitalization in patients treated with RRT in this study.MATERIAL and METHODS: Two hundred and eighty seven patients (87 hemodialysis (HD), 97 peritoneal dialysis (PD), 103 renal transplant (RT) patients) were enrolled in this study. Patients' data were collected retrospectively from hospital records.RESULTS: HD patients were older and had more comorbid diseases compared to PD and RT patients. Mortality rates were not different between the modalitites. The number and duration of hospitalization episodes were significantly lower in the PD group than that of the other two groups. Survival rates of HD patients were 84%, 55% and 30% for the 1st, 5th and 10th years, respectively while these rates were 93%, 81% and 59% for PD and 95%, 81% and 77% for RT patients.CONCLUSION: PD and RT patients were younger than HD patients and had less comorbid diseases. As a result, the number and duration of hospitalization episodes were significantly lower in the PD group when compared to the others. Survival rates in the RT group were better than that of the HD and PD groups.

Özet

AMAÇ: Böbrek yerine koyma tedavisi son dönem böbrek yetmezliği (SDBY) hastalarında yaşam süresini uzatmaktadır. Biz bu çalışmada, SDBY hastalarında böbrek yerine koyma tedavisi sağkalım, hastaneye yatış sıklığı ve hastanede kalış süresi üzerine olan etkilerini karşılaştırmayı amaçladık.GEREÇ ve YÖNTEMLER: İki yüz seksen yedi (87 hemodiyaliz (HD), 97 periton diyalizi (PD), 103 böbrek nakli (BN)) hastası çalışmaya alındı. Hasta verileri geriye dönük olarak hasta dosyalarından kaydedildi.BULGULAR: Hemodiyaliz hastalarının PD ve BN hastalarına oranla daha yaşlı ve daha fazla yandaş hastalığa sahip oldukları görüldü. Her 3 grupta mortalite oranları bakımından farklılık saptanmadı. PD grubunda hastaneye yatış sıklığı ve hastanede kalış süresi diğer iki gruba oranla daha düşüktü. 1, 5, 10 yıllık hasta sağ kalımları HD grubunda %84, %55, %30 iken, PD grubunda %93, %81, %59, BN grubunda ise %95, %81 ve %77 olarak bulundu.SONUÇ: PD ve RT hastaları HD hastalarına oranla daha genç, HD hastaları daha fazla ek hastalığa sahip, PD hastalarında hastaneye yatış oranı daha az iken en iyi hasta sağ kalımı ise BN grubundadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, A., GÜNGÖR, Ö., ÇAVDAR, C., ÇAMSARI, T., MERAL, M., SİFİL, A. (2022). Renal replasman tedavisi alan hastaların hastaneye yatış ve sağkalım açısından karşılaştırılması. Türk Nefroloji Diyaliz ve Transplantasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 72–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/636427

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. James MT, Hemmelgarn BR, Tonelli M: Early recognition and prevention of chronic kidney disease. Lancet 2010
  2. 1309 2. Ruggenenti P, Schiepattati A, Remuzzi G: Progression, remission, regression of chronic renal disease. Lancet 2001
  3. 1608 3. Johnson JG, Gore SM, Firth J: The effect of age, diabetes and other comorbidity on the survival of patients on dialysis: A systematic quantitative overview of the literature. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999
  4. 2164 4. Khan IH, Catto GR, Edward N, Fleming LW, Henderson IS, MacLeod AM: Influence of coexisting disease on survival on renalreplacement therapy. Lancet 1993
  5. 418 5. Letorneau I, Quimet D, Dumont M, Pichette V, Leblanc M: Renal replacement in end-stage renal disease patients over 75 years old. Am J Nephrol 2003
  6. 77 6. Ponikvar R, Ponikvar JB: Management of diabetic patients with hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001
  7. 96 7. Rodriquez JA, Cleries M, Vela E: Renal registry committee. Diabetic patients on renal replacement therapy: Analysis of Catalan Registry data. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997
  8. 2509 8. Held PJ, Port FK, Turenne MN, Gaylin DS, Hamburger RJ, Wolfe RA: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Comparison of patient mortality with adjustment for comorbid conditions. Kidney Int 1994
  9. 1169 9. Arora P, Kausz AT, Obrador GT, Ruthazer R, Khan S, Jenuleson CS, Meyer KB, Pereira BJ: Hospital utilization among chronic dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000
  10. 746 10. Levin A: The role of anemia in the genesis of cardiac abnormalities in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002
  11. 17(2): 207-210 11. Vonesh EF, Moran J: Mortality in end-stage renal disease: A reassessment of differences between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999
  12. 365 12. Maiorca R, Cancarini GC, Zubani R, Movilli E, Brunori G: Differing dialysis treatment strategies and outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996
  13. 2331 13. Winkelmayer WC, Glynn RJ, Mittleman MA, Levin R, Pliskin JS, Avorn J: Comparing mortality of elderly patients on hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995
  14. 183 14. Heaf JG, Lokkegaard H, Madsen M: Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to hemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002
  15. 117 15. Port FK, Wolfe RA, Mauger EA, Berling DP, Jiang K: Compariso