Journals / Türk Nefroloji Diyaliz ve Transplantasyon Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Diyaliz hastalarında QTc dispersiyonun sıklığının ve klinik ve laboratuvar parametrelerle ilişkisinin değerlendirilmesi

Evaluation of the frequency of QTc dispersion and ıts relationship with clinical and laboratory parameters in dialysis patients

Pages
196–201
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patients with QTcd >50 ms had significantly higher SBP, urea and ferritin levels, but significantly lower iron binding capacity and calcium levels compared those with QTcd ≤ 50 ms(p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: QTc dispersion is defined as the difference between the maximal and minimal correct QT interval on standard 12-lead ECG.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Increased QTc dispersion has been reported in ESRD patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patients with QTcd >50 ms had significantly higher SBP, urea and ferritin levels, but significantly lower iron binding capacity and calcium levels compared those with QTcd ≤ 50 ms(p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: QTc dispersion is defined as the difference between the maximal and minimal correct QT interval on standard 12-lead ECG. Increased QTc dispersion has been reported in ESRD patients. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the frequency of QTc dispersion and its relationship between clinical and laboratory parameters in patients on regular dialysis programme. MATERIAL and METHODS: Sixty patients underwent dialysis (30 HD, 30 CAPD) and another 30 healthy subjects were enrolled into the study. The standard 12 lead ECGs were performed and QTcd was measured from all dialysis patients and control subjects. Blood samples were collected for the measurement of laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Dialysis patients showed significantly higher QTcd than control subjects (55.75±36.48 versus 28.73±28.27; p=0.001). Patients with QTcd >50 ms had significantly higher SBP, urea and ferritin levels, but significantly lower iron binding capacity and calcium levels compared those with QTcd ≤ 50 ms(p

Özet

AMAÇ: 12 derivasyonlu standart EKG’de en uzun QTc mesafesi ile en kısa QTc mesafesi arasındaki fark QTc dispersiyonu olarak tanımlanır. SDBY hastalarında artmış QTc dispersiyonu bildirilmiştir. Biz çalışmamızda, diyaliz hastalarında QTc dispersiyonunun sıklığını ve klinik ve laboratuvar parametrelerle ilişkisinin değerlendirilmesini amaçladık. GEREÇ ve YÖNTEMLER: Çalışmaya 60 diyaliz hastası (30 HD, 30 PD) ve 30 sağlıklı birey dahil edildi. Tüm diyaliz hastalarının ve katılımcıların 12 derivasyonlu elektrokardiyografileri çekildi ve QTcd ölçüldü. Laboratuvar parametreleri için kan örnekleri toplandı. BULGULAR: Diyaliz hastaları kontrol grubundan daha yüksek QTcd’ye sahipti (55,75±36,48 ve 28,73±28,27; p=0.001). QTcd >50 ms olan hastalar QTcd ≤ 50 ms olanlarla karşılaştırıldığında, SKB, üre ve ferritin anlamlı olarak daha yüksek, Ca ve demir bağlama kapasitesi anlamlı olarak daha düşüktü (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KADİROĞLU, A. K., AYDIN, E., YILDIRIM, Y., YILMAZ, M. E., KAYABAŞI, H., YILMAZ, Z., YILMAZ, F. A. (2022). Diyaliz hastalarında QTc dispersiyonun sıklığının ve klinik ve laboratuvar parametrelerle ilişkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Nefroloji Diyaliz ve Transplantasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 196–201. https://ajindex.com/articles/636312

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Lorincz I, Mátyus J, Zilahi Z, Kun C, Karányi Z, Kakuk G: QT dispersion in patients with end-stage renal failure and during hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10(6): 1297-1302 2. Kimura K, Tabei K, Asano Y, Hosoda S: Cardiac arrhythmias in hemodialysis patients. Nephron 1989; 53: 201-207 3. Selby NM, McIntyre CW: The acute cardiac effects of dialysis. Semin Dial 2007; 20(3): 220-228 4. Unubol M, Eryilmaz U, Guney E, Ture M, Akgullu C: QT dispersion in patients with acromegaly. Endocrine 2013; 43(2): 419-423 5. Wei K, Dorian P, Newman D, Langer A: Association between QT dispersion and autonomic dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 859-863 6. Barr CS, Naas A, Freeman M, Lang CC, Struthers AD: QT dispersion and sudden unexpected death in chronic heart failure. Lancet 1994; 343: 327-329 7. Mayet J, Shahi M, McGrath K, Poulter NR, Sever PS, Foale RA, Thom SA: Left ventricular hypertrophy and QT dispersion in hypertension. Hypertension 1996; 28: 791-796 8. Yildiz A, Akkaya V, Sahin S, Tükek T, Besler M, Bozfakioglu S, Korkut F: QT dispersion and signalaveraged electrocardiogram in hemodialysis and CAPD patients. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21: 186-192 9. Kantarci G, Ozener C, Tokay S, Bihorac A, Akoglu E: QT dispersion in hemodialysis and CAPD patients. Nephron 2002; 91: 739-741 10. Howse M, Sastry S, Bell GM: Changes in the corrected QT interval and corrected QT dispersion during haemodialysis. Postgrad Med J 2002; 78(919): 273-275 11. Beaubien ER, Pylypchuk GB, Akhtar J, Biem HJ: Value of corrected QT interval dispersion in identifying patients initiating dialysis at increased risk of total and cardiovascular mortality. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39: 834-842 12. Okin PM, Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kligfield P: Electrocardio- graphic identification of increased left ventricular mass by simple voltage-duration products. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25 (2): 417-423 13. Sokolow M, Lyon TP: The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads. Am Heart J 1949; 37: 161-186 14. Statters DJ, Malik M, Ward DE, Camm AJ: QT dispersion: Problems of methodology and clinical significance. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol1994; 5: 672-685 15. Macfarlane PW, McLaughlin SC, Rodger JC: Influence of lead selection and population on automated measurement of QT dispersion. Circulation 1998; 98: 2160-2167 16. Bleyer AJ, Russell GB, Satko SG: Sudden and cardiac death in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 1999; 55: