Journals / Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

A Comparison of Bone Mineral Density Measurements in Two Different Regions of Turkey

Türkiye’nin İki Farklı Bölgesindeki Kemik Mineral Yoğunluğu Ölçümlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
52–56
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean age was 63.63±8.84 years in group 1 and 65.44±9.26 years in group 2, and the difference was statistically significant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: It was aimed to compare the values of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements made of patients in the osteoporosis (OP) unit in the provinces of Muğla and Erzurum provinces and to determine OP prevelance.Materials and Methods: The data were evaluated of a total of 3862 patients aged over 50 years, who were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients in Muğla were included in the 1st group, and patients in Erzurum were included in the second group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean age was 63.63±8.84 years in group 1 and 65.44±9.26 years in group 2, and the difference was statistically significant (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: It was aimed to compare the values of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements made of patients in the osteoporosis (OP) unit in the provinces of Muğla and Erzurum provinces and to determine OP prevelance.Materials and Methods: The data were evaluated of a total of 3862 patients aged over 50 years, who were included in the study. Of patients; ages, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded. Patients in Muğla were included in the 1st group, and patients in Erzurum were included in the second group. The BMDs of the spine and hip (femur neck) in both groups were measured using the dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) method. Results: A total of 3862 patients were included in the study. In group 1, the total number of patients was 2611 and 2518 of them were female, 93 were male. In the group 2, 1251 patients were present and 1093 were female and 158 were male. The mean age was 63.63±8.84 years in group 1 and 65.44±9.26 years in group 2, and the difference was statistically significant (p

Özet

Amaç: Muğla ve Erzurum illerinde osteoporoz (OP) ünitesinde kemik mineral yoğunluğu (KMY) ölçümü yapılmış hastaların değerlerini karşılaştırmak ve OP yaygınlığını belirlemek amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Elli yaş üstü toplam 3862 hastanın verileri değerlendirilip ve çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların; yaşları, cinsiyetleri ve vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ) kaydedildi. Muğla'daki hastalar 1. gruba, Erzurum'daki hastalar ise 2. gruba dahil edilerek çalışma iki gruba ayrıldı. Her iki gruptaki omurga ve kalça (femur boyun) KMY'leri dual enerji X-ışını absorbsiyometri (DEXA) yöntemi kullanılarak ölçüldü. Bulgular: Toplam 3862 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Birinci grupta toplam hasta sayısı 2611 idi ve bunların 2518'i kadın, 93'ü erkekti. İkinci grupta 1251 hasta mevcuttu ve 1093'ü kadın, 158'i erkekti. Birinci grupta yaş ortalaması 63,63±8,84, ikinci grupta 65,44±9,26 idi ve iki grup arasında anlamlı fark saptandı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDOĞAN, N. H., YENİÇERİ, Ö., İMERCİ, A. (2022). A Comparison of Bone Mineral Density Measurements in Two Different Regions of Turkey. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 52–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/636267

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Walker-Bone K, Dennison E, Cooper C. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2001;27:1-18
  2. Sarıdoğan M, Akarırmak Ü, Eskiyurt N, Tüzün Ş. Türkiye’nin 3 farklı coğrafi bölgesindeki postmenopozal kadınlarda D vitamini ve kemik mineral yoğunluğunun korelasyonu. Turk J Osteoporos 2010;16:49-52
  3. Arunabh S, Pollack S, Yeh J, Aloia JF. Body fat content and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:157-61
  4. Brustad M, Alsaker E, Engelsen O, Aksnes L, Lund E. Vitamin D status of middle-aged women at 65-71 degrees N in relation to dietary intake and exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Public Health Nutr 2003;7:327-35
  5. WHO. Assesment of osteoporotic fracture risk and its role in screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Tecnical Report Series, Geneva; 1994
  6. Aslan A, Karakoyun O, Güler E, Aydin S, Gök MV, Akkurt S. Kastamonu’da yaşayan Türk kadınlarında kemik mineral yoğunluğu, osteoporoz yaygınlığı ve bölgesel risk faktörlerinin değerlendirilmesi: KASTÜRKOS çalışması. Eklem Hastalık Cerrahisi 2012;23:62-7
  7. Pirimoğlu MZ, Alper AGÖ, Büyükbayrak EE, Kars B, Afşin Y, Ünal O, et al. Body mass index seems the most effective factor on bone mineral density comparing postmenopausal time, age or reproductive factors in healthy postmenopausal women. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obst 2011;21:1-5
  8. Baykara M. Bölgesel kadın popülasyonunda DEXA ile saptanan kemik mineral yoğunluğu değerlerinin Türk toplum standartlarıyla karşılaştırılması. F.Ü. Sağlık Bil Dergisi 2005;19:231-9
  9. Dilşen G, Göksoy T, Barden HS, Selim N, İşsever H. Sağlıklı Türk toplumunda kemik mineral yoğunluğu değerleri. Aktüel Tıp Dergisi 2001;6:96-108
  10. Genant HK, Grampp S, Glüer CC, Faulkner KG, Jergas M, Engelke K, et al. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1503-14
  11. Available from: http://www.measureup.com.au/convert-bmdmeasurements/ [Accessed; September 27, 2017]
  12. Bozbaş GT, Gürer G. Dual Enerji X-Ray Absorpsiyometri Ölçümü ve Bu Sonuçları Etkileyen Faktörler. Türkiye Klinikleri J PM&R-Special Topics 2009;2:76-83
  13. Matsuoka LY, Ide L, Wortsman J, MacLaughlin JA, Holick MF. Sunscreens suppress cutaneous vitamin D3 synthesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1987;64:1165-8
  14. Pongchaiyakul C, Kosulwat V, Charoenkiatkul S, Chailurkit LO, Rojroongwasinkul N, Rajatanavin R. The association of dietary calcium, bone mineral density and biochem